Generally because she's almost always right.
Advertisement
by Northern Davincia » Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:07 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Mattopilos II » Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:12 pm
by Bakery Hill » Fri Dec 15, 2017 9:39 pm
by The Liberated Territories » Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:49 pm
by Agritum » Sun Dec 17, 2017 2:15 am
by The Liberated Territories » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:26 pm
Agritum wrote:When populists beat experts in the debate but not on the field:
http://reason.com/blog/2017/12/14/inter ... et-neutral
by Northern Davincia » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:43 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Generally because she's almost always right.
Why do you think that? Rand's whole philosophy is the most fundamentally anti-Catholic thing there is. The heroic individual and their will and the rational pursuit of their own happiness are everything. God and His laws are held in contempt.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Shikihara » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:43 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Satan is always recruiting converts.
http://www.churchofsatan.com/satanism-a ... tivism.php
Hegel wrote:“Spirit certainly makes war upon itself - consumes its own existence; but in this very destruction it works up that existence into a new form, and each successive phase becomes in its turn a material, working on which it exalts itself to a new grade..”
by Northern Davincia » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:50 pm
Shikihara wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:Satan is always recruiting converts.
http://www.churchofsatan.com/satanism-a ... tivism.php
Nietzsche is better, for some of the reasons mentioned.
There really should be a Satanic Discussion Thread, but unfortunately I'm too lazy.Northern Davincia wrote:>implying there's anything wrong with this
Deregulating is supposed to stop monopolies how exactly?
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Shikihara » Sun Dec 17, 2017 10:01 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Who benefits the most from heavy regulations? Large corporations.
Northern Davincia wrote:What is the most likely to become a monopoly? A large corporation.
Hegel wrote:“Spirit certainly makes war upon itself - consumes its own existence; but in this very destruction it works up that existence into a new form, and each successive phase becomes in its turn a material, working on which it exalts itself to a new grade..”
by Bakery Hill » Sun Dec 17, 2017 10:22 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:Why do you think that? Rand's whole philosophy is the most fundamentally anti-Catholic thing there is. The heroic individual and their will and the rational pursuit of their own happiness are everything. God and His laws are held in contempt.
Hence why I included the 'almost'.
by Agritum » Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:58 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:Agritum wrote:When populists beat experts in the debate but not on the field:
http://reason.com/blog/2017/12/14/inter ... et-neutral
People are being hysterical. Just like after brexit, or Trump's election. (I don't support Trump but I never bought into the insane idea that he'd become Hitler or something.)
by The Liberated Territories » Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:13 am
Taihei Tengoku wrote:t. never heard of regulatory capture ever
by Janszoonia » Wed Dec 20, 2017 6:58 am
by Elwher » Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:36 am
by The Liberated Territories » Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:46 pm
by Northern Davincia » Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:59 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Shikihara » Thu Dec 21, 2017 6:23 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Some of our more left wing regulars of this thread might be interested in this.
An article by Benjamin Tucker in the early anarchist magazine "Liberty" about the differences between state and non-state socialists.
Why am I interested in it? Because he makes a lot of references to how "state" socialism is simply one giant monopoly replacing a lot of smaller monopolies.
Hegel wrote:“Spirit certainly makes war upon itself - consumes its own existence; but in this very destruction it works up that existence into a new form, and each successive phase becomes in its turn a material, working on which it exalts itself to a new grade..”
by Janszoonia » Thu Dec 21, 2017 6:59 pm
Shikihara wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:Some of our more left wing regulars of this thread might be interested in this.
An article by Benjamin Tucker in the early anarchist magazine "Liberty" about the differences between state and non-state socialists.
Why am I interested in it? Because he makes a lot of references to how "state" socialism is simply one giant monopoly replacing a lot of smaller monopolies.
Swallowing the anarcho-pill, TLT?
by Mattopilos II » Thu Dec 21, 2017 7:22 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Some of our more left wing regulars of this thread might be interested in this.
An article by Benjamin Tucker in the early anarchist magazine "Liberty" about the differences between state and non-state socialists.
Why am I interested in it? Because he makes a lot of references to how "state" socialism is simply one giant monopoly replacing a lot of smaller monopolies.
by Mattopilos II » Thu Dec 21, 2017 7:38 pm
by Janszoonia » Thu Dec 21, 2017 7:38 pm
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Andsed, El Lazaro, Hypron, Ineva, Keltionialang, Ors Might, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Unclear, Washington Resistance Army