Advertisement

by West Verrica » Sun May 29, 2016 9:56 am

by Noxtrem » Sun May 29, 2016 10:01 am
West Verrica wrote:Noxtrem wrote:I'm a libertarian, and I read quite a bit about my ideology, I happen to find Bastiat, David Boaz, and Ayn Rand to be great authors to read when it comes to Libertarianism and Free Market Policy. Do you guys have preferred authors for our ideology, or recommend novels?
When it comes to the presidential election, I am not willing to support anyone who has already been in a government office on a state or federal level. I would rather see McAfee or Petersen than I would Johnson. Besides, Johnson is at best a "Republican-lite".
Why is experience a con in your book?

by West Verrica » Sun May 29, 2016 10:05 am

by Noxtrem » Sun May 29, 2016 10:09 am
West Verrica wrote:Noxtrem wrote:Because in my mind, hold a government office in the USA generally means you had to make some kind of deal, or a bribe of some sort. I don't necessarily think that Johnson is the type to do that. But the amount of rampant corruption in the Government of the USA makes me feel like anybody who has been involved with the government is more likey to support the establishment or preserve the government because they fear losing their status. Or they might be bought out by the government. I suppose I'm just extremely anti-establishment.
That's an interesting perspective.

by West Verrica » Sun May 29, 2016 10:21 am

by Nationalist Gold Union » Sun May 29, 2016 10:31 am
Skappola wrote:Gary Johnson won the primary!

by The Liberated Territories » Sun May 29, 2016 10:39 am

by Skappola » Sun May 29, 2016 10:40 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:yawn
Now, we wait for the veep. There's probably going to be mass revolt if it is Weld.

by West Verrica » Sun May 29, 2016 10:41 am

by Skappola » Sun May 29, 2016 10:43 am

by West Verrica » Sun May 29, 2016 10:45 am

by Skappola » Sun May 29, 2016 10:46 am

by Germanic Templars » Sun May 29, 2016 10:48 am

by West Verrica » Sun May 29, 2016 10:49 am

by Skappola » Sun May 29, 2016 10:52 am
Germanic Templars wrote:So guys, guys. A few weeks ago I was looking up what a Libertarian is, and it turns out I align with a majority of what makes up a Libertarian is... So I might, most likely be a Libertarian... That aligns to the right, of course.![]()
Also who is Weld?

by The Liberated Territories » Sun May 29, 2016 10:59 am

by The Liberated Territories » Sun May 29, 2016 11:11 am
Skappola wrote:Germanic Templars wrote:So guys, guys. A few weeks ago I was looking up what a Libertarian is, and it turns out I align with a majority of what makes up a Libertarian is... So I might, most likely be a Libertarian... That aligns to the right, of course.![]()
Also who is Weld?
He's a former two-term Republican governor of Massachusetts who is running for Libertarian Vice Presidential candidate with Gary Johnson. Fiscally conservative and socially liberal, but his views on gun control and the fact that he only joined the Libertarian Party a couple weeks ago are drawing some ire from some Libertarians. He also endorsed John Kasich.
I personally don't mind - he's long since sworn off his former legislation on gun control, and he adds a lot of fundraising ability to the ticket. Plus, I personally like John Kasich.

by Skappola » Sun May 29, 2016 11:11 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:Skappola wrote:Yeah, he's more of a classical liberal than a Libertarian. He gets us funding, though, and he was a pretty good governor to boot.
I don't get this distinction, between "classical liberal" and libertarian. Both classical liberalism (today, neoliberalism) and libertarianism are huge categories of thought, right-libertarianism converges on both. E.g. Nock, a classical liberal and geoist, was the first to call himself a libertarian in the modern sense in America. Later Milton Friedman and von Mises (?) adopted this label, although Mises continued to prefer the label of liberal. Classical liberalism doesn't exist, if it did, it'd be archaic.
Classical liberals in Europe, are today neoliberals (see: neo-(classical) liberals.) Classical liberalism no longer exists, but has morphed into many modern currents of thinking, libertarianism is one of them, neoliberalism is another, social liberalism as a third, liberal conservatism, and so on. The basics of classical liberalism is accepted by all of the above: 1.) respect for life, 2.) respect for liberty, 3.) respect for property to various degrees. It's the minutae that differentiate these schools of thought, otherwise they are all under the category of liberalism.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Enormous Gentiles, Galloism, In-dia, Rusozak, The Huskar Social Union
Advertisement