That's what Confucianism says.
There are laws set in place to safeguard against evil. Ex: laws set in place for murder, rape, robbery etc.
Advertisement

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:01 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:03 pm
White Chrobatia wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Like Joch typed, religion isn't something you choose. It is what it is, no execptions.
Really? I was born and raised Catholic, but I chose not to follow their traditions because I disagree with them. Now I'm choosing to look into Buddhism, which is the religion of at least half of my ancestors.
Is that not choice? Perhaps I'm misinterpreting what you mean by choosing.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by White Chrobatia » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:03 pm

by Conserative Morality » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:03 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:That's what Confucianism says.
There are laws set in place to safeguard against evil. Ex: laws set in place for murder, rape, robbery etc.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:05 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Like Joch typed, religion isn't something you choose. It is what it is, no execptions.
"You don't choose religion, but you do choose sexuality."
It's like I walked into some weird mirror universe. Does this mean I no longer have to worry about hearing proselytizing Abrahamic religions anymore telling me I'm going to hell?
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:06 pm
White Chrobatia wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:That's what Confucianism says.
There are laws set in place to safeguard against evil. Ex: laws set in place for murder, rape, robbery etc.
And yet people still breach them regularly. They commit evil. They choose to commit evil. And they will be punished in the afterlife for it, at least, according to some religions.
Life isn't just some fated path that we're born into, forced along, and die from. But when the punishment for fornication is a near-death experience, it certainly begins to look that way.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:07 pm
Greater Nazi Germanic Reich wrote:Which Muslims here support the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates?
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by New haven america » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:07 pm
Jochizyd Republic wrote:There is no major religion that says homosexuality is okay.
Religion isn't about following what you want. It really isn't.
Liberals and other types flood every religious discussion with this crap. Give it up. No major religion will ever accept homosexuality, drugs, adultery, or whatever else you want people to do.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:08 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:When you effectively forbid certain actions under pain of punishment, it becomes the norm to not pursue those actions.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by New haven america » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:08 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Like Joch typed, religion isn't something you choose. It is what it is, no execptions.
"You don't choose religion, but you do choose sexuality."
It's like I walked into some weird mirror universe. Does this mean I no longer have to worry about hearing proselytizing Abrahamic religions anymore telling me I'm going to hell?

by Conserative Morality » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:09 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:1st off, you were wrong when you said:
I was referring to New Haven's quote about him typing: "You can't choose your sexuality", I typed "Yes, you can.

by White Chrobatia » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:09 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:White Chrobatia wrote:And yet people still breach them regularly. They commit evil. They choose to commit evil. And they will be punished in the afterlife for it, at least, according to some religions.
Life isn't just some fated path that we're born into, forced along, and die from. But when the punishment for fornication is a near-death experience, it certainly begins to look that way.
How is the illegal sex punishment near-death?

by New haven america » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:11 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:"You don't choose religion, but you do choose sexuality."
It's like I walked into some weird mirror universe. Does this mean I no longer have to worry about hearing proselytizing Abrahamic religions anymore telling me I'm going to hell?
1st off, you were wrong when you said:Conserative Morality wrote:Bad news for you, pal. If you can wake up tomorrow and say "Wow, I could really go for fucking a member of the same sex right now.", whether or not you go through with it, you aren't straight.
I was referring to New Haven's quote about him typing: "You can't choose your sexuality", I typed "Yes, you can.

by Conserative Morality » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:11 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:That's a good thing.

by Conserative Morality » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:12 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:How is the illegal sex punishment near-death?

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:13 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:13 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:14 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Conserative Morality » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:14 pm
New haven america wrote:No, you still get to deal with that, that is a universal constant.
Have fun in Hell. *Nod*

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:15 pm

https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Conserative Morality » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:16 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:That's why their empire fell. Man, I sound like FRS >w<

by White Chrobatia » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:16 pm

by Conserative Morality » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:17 pm
White Chrobatia wrote:I think their empire fell as a result of political decadence, economic stagnation caused by corruption, and the unavoidable mass migrations caused by the change of climate and the Huns rather than their failure to lash their own soldiers to death.
But my point stands, lol

by White Chrobatia » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:18 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:White Chrobatia wrote:I think their empire fell as a result of political decadence, economic stagnation caused by corruption, and the unavoidable mass migrations caused by the change of climate and the Huns rather than their failure to lash their own soldiers to death.
But my point stands, lol
Decimation wasn't harsh enough, clearly.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Sep 23, 2016 9:20 pm
Greater Nazi Germanic Reich wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Fascists? Man, that's new. I'd consider them extremists.
They had close relations with Nazi Germany and they are positioned far-right on the political scale. Most people think that the far-right is against Islam. I personally think that future far-right European regimes and Islamists can be allies.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Andsed, Based Illinois, Bienenhalde, Bradfordville, Elejamie, Haganham, Heavenly Assault, Myrensis, Philjia, Rary, Reloviskistan, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, Valrifall, Valyxias, Zerotaxia
Advertisement