People in Europe don't cover their faces in public (appealing to a practice) is not a good reason to ban the practice.
Otherwise we could also ban yodeling in the streets simply because "people don't yodel in public".
Advertisement

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:14 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:15 am
Teemant wrote:Scomagia wrote:The fact that an activity is not common is not a reason to ban it. How does it help prevent religious radicalization?
Because only most radical and fundamentalist islam versions ask women to cover their faces.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/12/21/as-muslim-women-we-actually-ask-you-not-to-wear-the-hijab-in-the-name-of-interfaith-solidarity/
Also this is a good article that talks about hijab. I'd recommend to read it.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:15 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Teemant wrote:
People in Europe don't cover their faces in public and it helps to prevent religious radicalization.
People in Europe don't cover their faces in public (appealing to a practice) is not a good reason to ban the practice.
Otherwise we could also ban yodeling in the streets simply because "people don't yodel in public".
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Seraven » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:16 am
The balkens wrote:yes.
The Alma Mater wrote:Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.
An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

by Teemant » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:17 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Teemant wrote:
Because only most radical and fundamentalist islam versions ask women to cover their faces.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/12/21/as-muslim-women-we-actually-ask-you-not-to-wear-the-hijab-in-the-name-of-interfaith-solidarity/
Also this is a good article that talks about hijab. I'd recommend to read it.
That's not even true. Are you Muslim? And I recommend that you find an Islamic source when talking about Islam. Niqab for some of my Muslim sisters is enhancement of their faith and worship in Allah (SWT).

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:22 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Teemant wrote:
Because only most radical and fundamentalist islam versions ask women to cover their faces.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/12/21/as-muslim-women-we-actually-ask-you-not-to-wear-the-hijab-in-the-name-of-interfaith-solidarity/
Also this is a good article that talks about hijab. I'd recommend to read it.
That's not even true. Are you Muslim? And I recommend that you find an Islamic source when talking about Islam. Niqab for some of my Muslim sisters is enhancement of their faith and worship in Allah (SWT).
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:24 am
Teemant wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:That's not even true. Are you Muslim? And I recommend that you find an Islamic source when talking about Islam. Niqab for some of my Muslim sisters is enhancement of their faith and worship in Allah (SWT).
The authors of the article are muslims. I didn't write the article.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Scomagia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:24 am
Teemant wrote:Scomagia wrote:The fact that an activity is not common is not a reason to ban it. How does it help prevent religious radicalization?
Because only most radical and fundamentalist islam versions ask women to cover their faces.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/12/21/as-muslim-women-we-actually-ask-you-not-to-wear-the-hijab-in-the-name-of-interfaith-solidarity/
Also this is a good article that talks about hijab. I'd recommend to read it.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:28 am
Scomagia wrote:Teemant wrote:
Because only most radical and fundamentalist islam versions ask women to cover their faces.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/12/21/as-muslim-women-we-actually-ask-you-not-to-wear-the-hijab-in-the-name-of-interfaith-solidarity/
Also this is a good article that talks about hijab. I'd recommend to read it.
I recognize that it is an act of fundamentalism to ask a woman to wear a veil or to wear one yourself. However, restricting that practice isn't going to make fundamentalism go away.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Teemant » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:28 am

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:30 am
Scomagia wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:The Holy Qur'an tells us to cover ourselves. For Muslim women, they wear a headscarf that covers their bosom. Paraphrased from Qur'an.
Paraphrasing from a religious book in a discussion about practices derived from that book isn't really sufficient. Specificity is pretty important here.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:31 am
Teemant wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:The Holy Qur'an tells us to cover ourselves. For Muslim women, they wear a headscarf that covers their bosom. Paraphrased from Qur'an.
The only countries where women have to wear headscarf (I don't know about Africa) are Iran and Saudi Arabia. In biggest muslim country in the world like Indonesia women don't have to wear hijab or cover their face.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:32 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Scomagia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:32 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Scomagia wrote:I recognize that it is an act of fundamentalism to ask a woman to wear a veil or to wear one yourself. However, restricting that practice isn't going to make fundamentalism go away.
It's not fundamentalism doing what Allah (SWT) told you to do. Muslim women wear hijab out of faith in Allah and modesty, but they shouldn't be forced to at the same time though. Niqab is for those Muslim women who want to take their faith further, but all Muslim women shouldn't be forced to wear niqab.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:34 am
Scomagia wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:It's not fundamentalism doing what Allah (SWT) told you to do. Muslim women wear hijab out of faith in Allah and modesty, but they shouldn't be forced to at the same time though. Niqab is for those Muslim women who want to take their faith further, but all Muslim women shouldn't be forced to wear niqab.
It is an act of fundamentalism by virtue of the fact that it isn't regularly practiced by the majority of followers. It is a strict interpretation and following of religious law. That sounds like fundamentalism to me.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Teemant » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:35 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Scomagia wrote:It is an act of fundamentalism by virtue of the fact that it isn't regularly practiced by the majority of followers. It is a strict interpretation and following of religious law. That sounds like fundamentalism to me.
Covering oneself with hijab is common. Are you talking about wearing niqab? Even then though, a good amount of Muslim women wear niqab. They may not be the majority, but they are a good amount.

by Based Madoka » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:41 am
Teemant wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Covering oneself with hijab is common. Are you talking about wearing niqab? Even then though, a good amount of Muslim women wear niqab. They may not be the majority, but they are a good amount.
If most of the muslim countries in the world don't ask women to wear hijab or cover their face then it isn't necessary.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:43 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by -The West Coast- » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:45 am

by El-Amin Caliphate » Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:45 am
Based Madoka wrote:Teemant wrote:
If most of the muslim countries in the world don't ask women to wear hijab or cover their face then it isn't necessary.
But simply a nation that has Islam as their state religion or the majority of the citizens are Muslim don't govern the religion. It's the choice of the person (or the family). There's a lot of things that aren't necessary that people do. Just because [insert country here] says that you must [insert command here], that doesn't mean you have to do it in any other country. Banning Islamic veils is against expression of one's religion. It'd be the same as banning the clothing and stylistic obligations of Sikhism, or banning Christian symbols to be worn on a person.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Ifreann, Neu California, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Orifna
Advertisement