Being better than the US is 90% of our job.

Advertisement

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Feb 02, 2017 2:48 pm


by Geilinor » Thu Feb 02, 2017 7:19 pm

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Feb 02, 2017 8:37 pm

by Collatis » Thu Feb 02, 2017 9:37 pm
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders

by Napkiraly » Thu Feb 02, 2017 9:47 pm

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:56 pm
Collatis wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
He is better than Harper.
And I think we can compare the two, being on the same continent and what not.
Obviously he is considerably better than Harper, but there is a rather large third party in Canadian politics that you may have heard of. Regardless, just because he is better than Harper doesn't mean he can't and shouldn't be criticized.

by Great Franconia and Verana » Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:23 am
Napkiraly wrote:I desperately do not want O'Leary to be the leader of the Conservatives. Nor Kellie Leitch for that matter. Joined the Conservative Party after meeting Michael Chong simply so I can vote for him. Though I fully expect the Tories to lose in 2020.

by Great Franconia and Verana » Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:25 am
Collatis wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
He is better than Harper.
And I think we can compare the two, being on the same continent and what not.
Obviously he is considerably better than Harper, but there is a rather large third party in Canadian politics that you may have heard of. Regardless, just because he is better than Harper doesn't mean he can't and shouldn't be criticized.

by Camicon » Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:29 am
Great Franconia and Verana wrote:Collatis wrote:Obviously he is considerably better than Harper, but there is a rather large third party in Canadian politics that you may have heard of. Regardless, just because he is better than Harper doesn't mean he can't and shouldn't be criticized.
My biggest objection to the NDP in 2015 was Mulcair. He was an excellent Opposition Leader, but I found him hyper partisan and condescending.
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the artsThe Trews, Under The Sun
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter

by Great Franconia and Verana » Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:46 am

by Saint Fedski » Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:57 am
Napkiraly wrote:I desperately do not want O'Leary to be the leader of the Conservatives. Nor Kellie Leitch for that matter. Joined the Conservative Party after meeting Michael Chong simply so I can vote for him. Though I fully expect the Tories to lose in 2019.

by Great Franconia and Verana » Fri Feb 03, 2017 2:37 am
Saint Fedski wrote:Napkiraly wrote:I desperately do not want O'Leary to be the leader of the Conservatives. Nor Kellie Leitch for that matter. Joined the Conservative Party after meeting Michael Chong simply so I can vote for him. Though I fully expect the Tories to lose in 2019.
Leitch is the only one worth voting for. If you won't support her, you might as well vote Liberal.

by Saint Fedski » Fri Feb 03, 2017 2:45 am
Great Franconia and Verana wrote:Saint Fedski wrote:Leitch is the only one worth voting for. If you won't support her, you might as well vote Liberal.
![]()
You really must not know anything about Canadian politics. She is a faux-populist riding the wave of nationalistic vitriol to an unlikely, and ultimately, hostile environment.
Then again, a Leitch leadership win would confine the Tories to another four years in the opposition benches, so I am not too unhappy about that.

by Great Franconia and Verana » Fri Feb 03, 2017 2:51 am
Saint Fedski wrote:Great Franconia and Verana wrote:![]()
You really must not know anything about Canadian politics. She is a faux-populist riding the wave of nationalistic vitriol to an unlikely, and ultimately, hostile environment.
Then again, a Leitch leadership win would confine the Tories to another four years in the opposition benches, so I am not too unhappy about that.
You're joking? She had many of her current opinions before Trump entered the ring. The Liberals, liberal policies and liberals under the Progressive Conservative and CPC banners have ruined Canada, starting with Pierre Trudeau. We need a real shift to the right, one way or another. Let's not even discuss the mess of Ontario under McGuinty and Wynne. We needed Hudak and look at what we were stuck with.

by Saint Fedski » Fri Feb 03, 2017 3:23 am

by Great Franconia and Verana » Fri Feb 03, 2017 3:41 am
Saint Fedski wrote:Where do you want to start? The massive stimulus spending? Quebec as a nation within a nation? Not quashing Idle No More? (Even Pierre Trudeau wouldn't have tolerated acts of war like that.) Further destruction of the armed forces?
And Doctor Leitch, yes, she is a doctor, is hardly a moderate. Harper kept his people in line pretty tight, there was little room for personal opinion. I didn't argue she wasn't an insider, don't put words in my mouth. And populism comes from the left wing too! It's not just a right wing thing the the media will have you believe.
There’s also the authenticity question. Leitch was, for most of her political life, considered a centrist. She has no history of championing cultural values issues, anti-elite populism or much of anything to do with immigration, at least not before the last federal election campaign. “Over the years we’ve had literally dozens of conversations about whether or not we would eventually run and what we would run on, what kind of issues attract us to politics and things like that,” said one Ontario Conservative who has known Leitch since the mid-1990s. “I can tell you the number of times issues related to anti-Canadian values came up was zero. Like not three, not seven, zero.”

by South Park Labourite » Fri Feb 03, 2017 4:16 am

by AsReil » Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:09 am

by Oneracon » Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:02 am
Saint Fedski wrote:Where do you want to start? The massive stimulus spending? Quebec as a nation within a nation? Not quashing Idle No More? (Even Pierre Trudeau wouldn't have tolerated acts of war like that.) Further destruction of the armed forces?
And Doctor Leitch, yes, she is a doctor, is hardly a moderate. Harper kept his people in line pretty tight, there was little room for personal opinion. I didn't argue she wasn't an insider, don't put words in my mouth. And populism comes from the left wing too! It's not just a right wing thing the the media will have you believe.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by AsReil » Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:04 am
Oneracon wrote:Wtf is a "pronoun law"? Sounds like something Jordan Peterson would make a video ranting about.

by Oneracon » Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:08 am

Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by AsReil » Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:32 pm
Oneracon wrote:
What's "yikes" about Bill C-16? It updates federal human rights law to align it with provincial and territorial human rights laws which have already included gender identity alongside sex, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc. as unacceptable grounds for discrimination for a while.
Also, how is this a "pronoun law" if there is no mention of the word pronoun?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Based Illinois, Continental Free States, EuroStralia, Heavenly Assault, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Tarsonis, Thermodolia, Umeria
Advertisement