NATION

PASSWORD

First female 11X has been accepted

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Imperial City-States
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8281
Founded: Aug 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial City-States » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:41 am

It does have to do with gender.

The amount of training (physical) that a female has to do and the amount of training a male has to do to achieve the same level of physical fitness is immensely skewed.

It is far easier for a male to obtain certain levels, and maintain them, than a female. Training can help sure. But it will by no means alleviate the differences born out of how we are built.

The issue I have is that woman have a lesser standard that they adhere too. Regardless of if they're a medic, pencil pusher or mechanic. I posted the AFPT standards for males and females earlier in the thread. There is a very significant difference between the two.

You want men and women to serve side by side in Combat Arms?
Keep the same standard and don't degrade it just to meet your political goals.
http://www.broomdces.com/nseconomy/nations.php?nation=Imperial+City-States
"The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion, but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
"Stand in the ashes of a million dead souls and ask the ghost if honor matters."
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
George Orwell
"No advance in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution has ever brought human equality a millimeter nearer."
George Orwell

Unapologetically American
U.S Army

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22873
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:41 am

Imperial City-States wrote:Ones masculinity, or if they're compensating for something. Is entirely illrelevent to if a female can preform the task at hand.
People such as yourself don't seem to understand the concept that females, generally, in this profession, will be significantly weaker than men.

[citation needed]
If i am bleeding out on the ground in full gear, and a female soldier is unable to move me to a position where I can get proper care I die.

If I am bleeding out on the ground in full gear, and a male soldier is unable to move me to a position where I can get proper care, I die.
It's not about if people are sexist or not (not denying that some sexism does exsist ) it's about surviving.

Having women in the military will not cause all our soldiers to die. Not even close.
I have no desire to have my Children grow up without a father because some politician wanted to put 'fairness' over effectiveness.

If women are so deadly, apparently, why don't we send them over to our enemies' armies? Apparently their very existence as soldiers causes male soldiers to die.
If she's a complete beast and as proven she is capable of adhering to the male standard.

I hope you then think that the only men who should be in the military are "complete beasts" as well.
War isn't about being 'fair' or 'equal', it's about how effective you can be at killing the enemy. Boo-fucking-hoo if someone's feelings get hurt. I have no desire to die because of someone's feelings, and I am by no means sexist.

I don't think you have any idea what kind of women will try to join the military. I'll give you a hint: it isn't this kind.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Imperial City-States
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8281
Founded: Aug 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial City-States » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:50 am

I need to provide a citation for something that is proven by science. what?


You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. This is all in reference to females in Combat Arms. Not military as a whole.


You should go to a military installation during PT hours. You might be extremely disappointed at what you find.
http://www.broomdces.com/nseconomy/nations.php?nation=Imperial+City-States
"The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion, but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
"Stand in the ashes of a million dead souls and ask the ghost if honor matters."
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
George Orwell
"No advance in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution has ever brought human equality a millimeter nearer."
George Orwell

Unapologetically American
U.S Army

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26059
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:53 am

If i am bleeding out on the ground in full gear, and a female soldier is unable to move me to a position where I can get proper care I die. [/quote[

Except that is completely untrue.]

There is an extensive military history of using military medics to carry wounded soldiers. Not "handfuls" or even "thousands". Hundreds of thousands of women medics fought in WW2, saving literally countless soldiers' lives.

And of course the situation where you're wounded and the only way for you to be rescued is for a single soldier to bodily carry you on their backs is rather unusual. (Why do you think the IDF trains soldiers to carry their injured comrades on stretchers?)

.

War isn't about being 'fair' or 'equal', it's about how effective you can be at killing the enemy. Boo-fucking-hoo if someone's feelings get hurt. I have no desire to die because of someone's feelings, and I am by no means sexist.


This has nothing to do with what people criticized. It's totally unrelated

What's sexist is the idea that a woman, to be respected, needs to be 'best at everything' - i.e. to perform above and beyond males.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26059
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:55 am

Imperial City-States wrote:
You should go to a military installation during PT hours. You might be extremely disappointed at what you find.


I served in the armed forces.

Our PT instructors were women.

Our drill instructors were women.

When we ran about in full gear these women ran in front of the formation.

When we did PT these women did PT with us.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65564
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:56 am

Imperial City-States wrote:
Ammunition, water, batteries (Radio).

Three most important items imo.


"Water, ammo, socks. Then any fucking luxury"-
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22873
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:56 am

Imperial City-States wrote:I need to provide a citation for something that is proven by science. what?

Apparently I need to explain that the average woman is not the average woman soldier.
You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. This is all in reference to females in Combat Arms. Not military as a whole.

You yourself have referenced that the standards are the same regardless. So don't pull that shit.
You should go to a military installation during PT hours. You might be extremely disappointed at what you find.

And why is that?
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26059
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:57 am

What a completely unbiased site too.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22873
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:59 am

Allanea wrote:What a completely unbiased site too.

What do you mean? I'm pretty sure the Army is an authority on what the Army is doing.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26059
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:59 am

The SteadyHealth site is rather biased. It's not a scientific source by any means.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:00 am

Women should be able to apply for combat roles if so they wish, but these positions will remain primarily occupied by males. Sexual dimorphism is still a thing, folks.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65564
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:02 am

Eastern Equestria wrote:Women should be able to apply for combat roles if so they wish, but these positions will remain primarily occupied by males. Sexual dimorphism is still a thing, folks.


Clearly we should SCIENCE! to reduce sexual dimorphism in human species. *nods*
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26059
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:02 am

Cultural dimorphism is more of an issue here.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65564
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:04 am

Allanea wrote:Cultural dimorphism is more of an issue here.


Reduce that too.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Imperial City-States
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8281
Founded: Aug 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial City-States » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:04 am

On my mobile so quotes don't work as they should so apologies ahead of time.



While the written standard is the same yes. The expected standard is much higher, regardless of if you're male of female.

@Allanea:

I'm presuming you were in the Air Force or Navy?
Additionally were you in a combat arms mos?
Not sure how it's done elsewhere but where I'm at we put the people who're likely to fall out, in front so they can set the pace.


How many of those Female medics operated in a 'Line' role? (Legitimately curious )

In the American Army, the medic carries a stretcher and he more often than not is staying near the Platoons command element. Meaning that in an emergency the opportunity for a stretcher is very thin. And that's not even going into the cluster fuck that vehicle casualties are.
http://www.broomdces.com/nseconomy/nations.php?nation=Imperial+City-States
"The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion, but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
"Stand in the ashes of a million dead souls and ask the ghost if honor matters."
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
George Orwell
"No advance in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution has ever brought human equality a millimeter nearer."
George Orwell

Unapologetically American
U.S Army

User avatar
Imperial City-States
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8281
Founded: Aug 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial City-States » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:09 am

Allanea wrote:The SteadyHealth site is rather biased. It's not a scientific source by any means.



Additional sauce.


sauce for the sauce god.
Last edited by Imperial City-States on Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.broomdces.com/nseconomy/nations.php?nation=Imperial+City-States
"The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion, but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
"Stand in the ashes of a million dead souls and ask the ghost if honor matters."
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
George Orwell
"No advance in wealth, no softening of manners, no reform or revolution has ever brought human equality a millimeter nearer."
George Orwell

Unapologetically American
U.S Army

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26059
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:12 am

I was in the Israel Defense Force ground forces. Not a combat MOS. Earlier in this thread I posted about this in detail.

40% of the Soviet Union's field medics in WW2 were women

Here's how it worked:

Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 3.


Female snipers in WW2 set records that no US male sniper has beat yet.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:14 am

Ceterius wrote:
Imperial City-States wrote:
In the military, and especially the Combat Arms side of the house. Respect is not given (beyond rank) it's earned. For a woman to be respected she needs to earn it, and by that i mean she has to be on top of literally everything and be the best at everything, that is the only way she will gain respect.



Remember how I said that the military is evidently full of sexist fraggers?
You just gave me more ammunition.
Why does she have to be the best? Why can't she just be as good as everyone else, the answer is because sexist fraggers feel threatened.
Evidently they have very fragile masculinity, or maybe they're trying to compensate for something.


Jesus fucking Christ. To be respected in the combat arms you literally have to embody the best of the best, not average level. Average level is already beyond normal standards when compared to a NON-combat arms branch. "Good as everybody else" is pretty getting on average a minimum of 270+ on a PT score, being able to do a 15 mile ruck march in under 3 hours with 45 lbs of gear at the minimum with possible additionional equipment to the standard if your PSG, PL or 1SG decides you get to be the equipment bitch of the day. And this is just nominal standards, now in combat in downrange its a whole new ball game.

Allanea wrote:I was in the Israel Defense Force ground forces. Not a combat MOS. Earlier in this thread I posted about this in detail.

40% of the Soviet Union's field medics in WW2 were women

Here's how it worked:

Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 3.


Female snipers in WW2 set records that no US male sniper has beat yet.


68W is not an exclusively male MOS.
Last edited by Uxupox on Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26059
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:14 am

Uxupox wrote:
Ceterius wrote:

Remember how I said that the military is evidently full of sexist fraggers?
You just gave me more ammunition.
Why does she have to be the best? Why can't she just be as good as everyone else, the answer is because sexist fraggers feel threatened.
Evidently they have very fragile masculinity, or maybe they're trying to compensate for something.


Jesus fucking Christ. To be respected in the combat arms you literally have to embody the best of the best, not average level. Average level is already beyond normal standards when compared to a NON-combat arms branch. "Good as everybody else" is pretty getting on average a minimum of 270+ on a PT score, being able to do a 15 mile ruck march in under 3 hours with 45 lbs of gear at the minimum with possible additionional equipment to the standard if your PSG, PL or 1SG decides you get to be the equipment bitch of the day. And this is just nominal standards, now in combat in downrange its a whole new ball game.


So you don't respect your fellow soldiers?
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:16 am

Allanea wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
Jesus fucking Christ. To be respected in the combat arms you literally have to embody the best of the best, not average level. Average level is already beyond normal standards when compared to a NON-combat arms branch. "Good as everybody else" is pretty getting on average a minimum of 270+ on a PT score, being able to do a 15 mile ruck march in under 3 hours with 45 lbs of gear at the minimum with possible additionional equipment to the standard if your PSG, PL or 1SG decides you get to be the equipment bitch of the day. And this is just nominal standards, now in combat in downrange its a whole new ball game.


So you don't respect your fellow soldiers?


Respect the rank even if you don't like the guy but other than that if he is a piece of shit, well things may happen.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:16 am

Immoren wrote:
Eastern Equestria wrote:Women should be able to apply for combat roles if so they wish, but these positions will remain primarily occupied by males. Sexual dimorphism is still a thing, folks.


Clearly we should SCIENCE! to reduce sexual dimorphism in human species. *nods*


Soooooo, eugenics?

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22873
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:17 am

Imperial City-States wrote:
Allanea wrote:The SteadyHealth site is rather biased. It's not a scientific source by any means.



Additional sauce.


sauce for the sauce god.

Wallenburg wrote:
Imperial City-States wrote:I need to provide a citation for something that is proven by science. what?

Apparently I need to explain that the average woman is not the average woman soldier.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26059
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:18 am

Imperial City-States wrote:
Allanea wrote:The SteadyHealth site is rather biased. It's not a scientific source by any means.



Additional sauce.


sauce for the sauce god.



There's no doubt that women are somewhat weaker than men in certain measurements (the exact difference is stated differently in different forces).

The question is "are there some women who are strong enough to fulfil the objective requirements of combat" (as opposed to the requirements of a military recruitment standard)?

It is not relevant whether women are stronger than men, because combat is not a hand-to-hand wrestling match.
Nor does it matter whether women are "on average" stronger than the average male, because the "average woman" or the "average male" are not being recruited (as they don't physically exist). John T. Public and Jane Q. Public are being recruited.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22873
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:18 am

Uxupox wrote:
Allanea wrote:
So you don't respect your fellow soldiers?


Respect the rank even if you don't like the guy but other than that if he is a piece of shit, well things may happen.

It sounds like you are insinuating that you don't respect the law, either.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:19 am

Allanea wrote:What's sexist is the idea that a woman, to be respected, needs to be 'best at everything' - i.e. to perform above and beyond males.


Females have to perform above and beyond to meet the same physical requirements as males (in general, of course there are some who can meet them).
Last edited by Eastern Equestria on Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Almighty Biden, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bovad, Fort Viorlia, Likhinia, New Temecula, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, Republic Under Specters Grasp, Statesburg, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tierra Alta, Zapato

Advertisement

Remove ads