Oh, I'd be discharged all right.
Advertisement

by Firsthome » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:12 am
Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.

by Grande Republic of Arcadia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:17 am
Islamic Emirate wrote:Imperial City-States wrote:Is she going to go AWOL like the female combat engineer?
As long as the standard isn't degraded (like it will be) then i wouldn't have a problem with it. However since the standard will be degraded (because of politics) I do have a major problem with it. I highly doubt she'll pass on her own merit. Especially considering the mentality that she has presented. She's literally going to be eaten alive by those Drill Sergeants. No If's, Ands or Buts about it.
No, she's going to have a female drill sergeant, as I understand it.

by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:17 am
Firsthome wrote:Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Well, due to rising obesity rates, the male population will soon not be enough to support the bloated US military. The US, therefore, has three options:
1) Decrease the size of the active military
2) Put in motion a long-term plan to fight rising obesity rates
3) Allow women into the army
Knowing the American political landscape, 1) is about as likely to happen as the British reconquest of the Thirteen Colonies. 2) Requires long-term planning from people who can't even pass a yearly budget. 3) Seems like the only viable option. And it's perfectly fine, because just because the average women has less muscle mass than the average male doesn't mean there are plenty of women who've got more muscle mass than the average male.
Or, you know, they could have high school gym last for more than a quarter of a year
Uxupox wrote:Allanea wrote:
There's only a limit to how much disobedience will be permitted.
There was once a time drill sergeants felt that physically assaulting troops was permissible.
Still is in some parts. You just gotta look deep.Hirota wrote:So, your argument is something that might happen is bad. You have no evidence to support that it will happen, only wild half-baked unsupported assumptions. Do you see how people might not take you seriously?
If she is good enough to pass, then there this is a non-issue. You're inventing drama where only fiction exists.
No evidence? Just like they did with infantry BOLC? Hmm.Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Well, due to rising obesity rates, the male population will soon not be enough to support the bloated US military. The US, therefore, has three options:
1) Decrease the size of the active military
2) Put in motion a long-term plan to fight rising obesity rates
3) Allow women into the army
Knowing the American political landscape, 1) is about as likely to happen as the British reconquest of the Thirteen Colonies. 2) Requires long-term planning from people who can't even pass a yearly budget. 3) Seems like the only viable option. And it's perfectly fine, because just because the average women has less muscle mass than the average male doesn't mean there are plenty of women who've got more muscle mass than the average male.
Downsizing is already underway.

by Hirota » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:19 am
The assumption that because it happened before, it will inevitably happen again is fallacious reasoning.Uxupox wrote:No evidence? Just like they did with infantry BOLC? Hmm.

by Uxupox » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:25 am
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Firsthome wrote:Or, you know, they could have high school gym last for more than a quarter of a year
Oh yeah, education reform! Part of a long-term plan the current Congress couldn't manage if they were led by Stalin himself.Uxupox wrote:
Still is in some parts. You just gotta look deep.
No evidence? Just like they did with infantry BOLC? Hmm.
Downsizing is already underway.
How much does this downsizing encompass?

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:30 am
Uxupox wrote:Oh please. Just ask another serviceman about TRADOC and they will tell you.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Uxupox » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:33 am

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:38 am
Uxupox wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Sure, I'll go onto ARRSE and ask about the British Army payroll system, I'll get some really informative viewpoints.
Oh please. This isn't the PNN we are talking about, TRADOC like I said before is shit, their policy making is shit and when you get assigned to go there and have to sit there for weeks on end because somebody is hella incompetent is managing a course, well it sure fucking sucks.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Uxupox » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:40 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Uxupox wrote:
Oh please. This isn't the PNN we are talking about, TRADOC like I said before is shit, their policy making is shit and when you get assigned to go there and have to sit there for weeks on end because somebody is hella incompetent is managing a course, well it sure fucking sucks.
Gee, this is a totally unique viewpoint about an administrative bureaucracy in an organisation.

by Firsthome » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:42 am
Uxupox wrote:Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Oh yeah, education reform! Part of a long-term plan the current Congress couldn't manage if they were led by Stalin himself.
How much does this downsizing encompass?
Really have no idea how much of a downsizing the army is gonna do. It could be eliminating whole entire brigades or just some select few personnel, I really don't know.Hirota wrote:The assumption that because it happened before, it will inevitably happen again is fallacious reasoning.
Secondly, the assumption that it might happen has no bearing on the present.
Oh please. Just ask another serviceman about TRADOC and they will tell you.Firsthome wrote:Oh, I'd be discharged all right.
You'd probably go to jail sadly because it would be the word of the drill sergeant against the word of a recruit unless an investigation takes place.
Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.

by Firsthome » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:43 am
Laerod wrote:That's like pointing out a thread about kittens contains posts about baby cats.

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:47 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Hirota » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:05 am
Uxupox wrote:Oh please. Just ask another serviceman about TRADOC and they will tell you.

by Risottia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:06 am
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:How much does this downsizing encompass?

by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:09 am

by Imperial City-States » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:11 am

by Zoice » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:11 am

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:15 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Imperial City-States » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:19 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Imperial City-States wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong. But is a first hand account not evidence?
Especially when it's confirmed by people from entirely different walks of military life.
No, a first-hand account is a source.
We do not know that it is a first-hand account, just that the poster claims that is his experience.

by Imperial City-States » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:30 am

by Victoriala » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:39 am
Kautharr wrote:Warped Woods wrote:Can't have a child without a daddy either. They'll just turn gay from the mother's effeminacy.
No, a woman's place is in the home to nurture and raise the children. A man's place is at work or at war. Back when that was how the world was, there was no gay or transgender people.
FACTBOOK | LA SOCIÉTÉ | NATIONS | ILLUMINATOR | +
Fucking little island person. 陰 and 陽 but mostly 陰. I draw and do designs.
My NS activity is 90% shitposts. Singy and I fuck each other occasionally.
Equity is True Equality. Pro-Aufklärung, Anti-Gegenaufklärung. [economic: -4.0 social: -4.21]

by Hladgos » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:40 am

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:41 am
Kautharr wrote:Warped Woods wrote:Can't have a child without a daddy either. They'll just turn gay from the mother's effeminacy.
No, a woman's place is in the home to nurture and raise the children. A man's place is at work or at war. Back when that was how the world was, there was no gay or transgender people.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dakran, EuroStralia, Firdae, Grazeland, Senkaku, Tillania, Wartime Wallowis
Advertisement