Geilinor wrote:He's only on the list because of his role in his family's business.
which is what i've said? you can go back and read my post if you want. it'll take like 40 seconds.
Advertisement
by Ashworth-Attwater » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:33 pm
Geilinor wrote:He's only on the list because of his role in his family's business.
by Ashworth-Attwater » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:34 pm
by Talvezout » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:35 pm
by Calimera II » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:36 pm
Ashworth-Attwater wrote:
i mean, he's had his name mentioned in this huge corruption scandal. it is a big deal, even if he's innocent. you can't ignore this just because you like macri.
by Major-Tom » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:37 pm
Ashworth-Attwater wrote:don't get me wrong, i'm not just banging the same drum because macri is right-wing. i'm anxious to see how tankies explain the shitloads of money revolutionary™ leaders like gadaffi and assad had/have overseas.
by Ashworth-Attwater » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:37 pm
Major-Tom wrote:His name was mentioned. Until details arise on the extent of his involvement in all of this, I'm simply not going to engage in a kneejerk propensity to make accusations.
by Novus America » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:38 pm
Ashworth-Attwater wrote:don't get me wrong, i'm not just banging the same drum because macri is right-wing. i'm anxious to see how tankies explain the shitloads of money revolutionary™ leaders like gadaffi and assad had/have overseas.
by Major-Tom » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:38 pm
Ashworth-Attwater wrote:Major-Tom wrote:His name was mentioned. Until details arise on the extent of his involvement in all of this, I'm simply not going to engage in a kneejerk propensity to make accusations.
i don't think i'm making any accusations. pratically all i said is that macri has been implicated in all of this. in fact, iirc, i was the first to offer his perspective on the issue by repeating his official statement.
by Novus America » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:39 pm
Major-Tom wrote:Ashworth-Attwater wrote:don't get me wrong, i'm not just banging the same drum because macri is right-wing. i'm anxious to see how tankies explain the shitloads of money revolutionary™ leaders like gadaffi and assad had/have overseas.
I understand. That being said, I'm still inclined to believe that Macri had limited, if not any, connections to Fonseca simply because it stems more so from his family's dealings.
by Bogdanov Vishniac » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:41 pm
by Calimera II » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:42 pm
Major-Tom wrote:Ashworth-Attwater wrote:
i don't think i'm making any accusations. pratically all i said is that macri has been implicated in all of this. in fact, iirc, i was the first to offer his perspective on the issue by repeating his official statement.
Then I think that many of us are on the same wavelength, Calimera, myself, and you included.
by Ashworth-Attwater » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:43 pm
Calimera II wrote:How is it a big deal if there seems to be no problem at all?
Your comment proves my point. The facts are presented in such a way that those who are enlisted 'look' like criminals.
by Ashworth-Attwater » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:44 pm
by Calimera II » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:47 pm
by Ashworth-Attwater » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:50 pm
by Novus America » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Ashworth-Attwater wrote:Calimera II wrote:How is it a big deal if there seems to be no problem at all?
Your comment proves my point. The facts are presented in such a way that those who are enlisted 'look' like criminals.
the big deal is that the name of a head of state was mentioned in a huge international corruption scandal. whether he is innocent or not remains to be seen. this however, doesn't change the fact that his name was mentioned in a — i repeat — huge international scandal. this is a big deal. do you know what a big deal is? a huge international corruption scandal could be classified as a big deal. it can't not be a big deal because you think he's innocent. this does not change the nature of the scandal.
GET. THIS. THROUGH. YOUR. HEAD.
by Thomas Insaniac » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:52 pm
Ashworth-Attwater wrote:Countries with public officials implicated in the Panama Papers leak
by Thomas Insaniac » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:54 pm
Ashworth-Attwater wrote:Calimera II wrote:How is it a big deal if there seems to be no problem at all?
Your comment proves my point. The facts are presented in such a way that those who are enlisted 'look' like criminals.
the big deal is that the name of a head of state was mentioned in a huge international corruption scandal. whether he is innocent or not remains to be seen. this however, doesn't change the fact that his name was mentioned in a — i repeat — huge international scandal. this is a big deal. do you know what a big deal is? a huge international corruption scandal could be classified as a big deal. it can't not be a big deal because you think he's innocent. this does not change the nature of the scandal.
GET. THIS. THROUGH. YOUR. HEAD.
by Ashworth-Attwater » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:54 pm
Novus America wrote:Ashworth-Attwater wrote:
the big deal is that the name of a head of state was mentioned in a huge international corruption scandal. whether he is innocent or not remains to be seen. this however, doesn't change the fact that his name was mentioned in a — i repeat — huge international scandal. this is a big deal. do you know what a big deal is? a huge international corruption scandal could be classified as a big deal. it can't not be a big deal because you think he's innocent. this does not change the nature of the scandal.
GET. THIS. THROUGH. YOUR. HEAD.
And in the media you are guilty until, and often after you are proven innocent.
by Calimera II » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:55 pm
Thomas Insaniac wrote:Ashworth-Attwater wrote:Countries with public officials implicated in the Panama Papers leak
I'm surprised Germany is clean, honestly. Although it's probably the same case with Germany, America and other nations, they just use another company.
by Bogdanov Vishniac » Sun Apr 03, 2016 6:55 pm
Thomas Insaniac wrote:Ashworth-Attwater wrote:Countries with public officials implicated in the Panama Papers leak
I'm surprised Germany is clean, honestly. Although it's probably the same case with Germany, America and other nations, they just use another company.
by Calimera II » Sun Apr 03, 2016 7:02 pm
Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:Thomas Insaniac wrote:
I'm surprised Germany is clean, honestly. Although it's probably the same case with Germany, America and other nations, they just use another company.
It's worth noting that Mossack Fonseca is the fourth-largest offshoring company in the world - just imagine what the three bigger companies ahead of it have locked up in their databases.
by Costa Fierro » Sun Apr 03, 2016 7:08 pm
by Conserative Morality » Sun Apr 03, 2016 7:12 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Elwher, Kostane, Likhinia, The Confederate States of America, Umeria
Advertisement