Yeah, we all know Bush is.
Advertisement

by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:35 am

by Outer Sparta » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:42 am

by Ashmoria » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:43 am
Saiwania wrote:The answer is most obviously yes. But the US shouldn't be doing any of the occupying of territory. The strategy should be to ensure Assad's military recaptures most of Syria with Russia's help, ensure that the Peshmerga hold onto their gains and sit on it, and ensure Iraq's military recaptures most of Iraq with the help of Iran. If ISIS territory first shrinks on all sides, that just leaves a much smaller area that needs to be invaded.
The Sunni portion of Iraq, the area of least value that none of the belligerents want, can be where IS is finally routed and it can promptly be made into a protectorate of Jordan or Saudi Arabia if not an independent Sunni state. A Kurdish state can form in the north, while Iraq is free to become fully Shia like it wanted to.

by Saiwania » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:52 am
Ashmoria wrote:Russia pulled out of Syria.

by We Couldnt Agree On A Name » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:54 am

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:10 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Royal Hindustan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:15 am

by Valaran » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:17 am
Royal Hindustan wrote:US oil production has risen over the past few years, so I don't see why the middle east is an absolute necessity to us. It's not our fight anyway.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Royal Hindustan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:19 am
Valaran wrote:Royal Hindustan wrote:US oil production has risen over the past few years, so I don't see why the middle east is an absolute necessity to us. It's not our fight anyway.
Its somewhat foolish to assume that this is the only reason the middle east is important.
Moreover, oil prices are affected by petroleum supply from all parts of the globe, so that point is only relevant if the US was somehow not integrated into the global economy and relied on autarchy. That is not the case.

by Valaran » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:21 am
Royal Hindustan wrote:
Ideally oil dependency should decrease over time.
, and Saudi Arabia and Dubai are still very much stable
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:25 am
Royal Hindustan wrote:US oil production has risen over the past few years, so I don't see why the middle east is an absolute necessity to us. It's not our fight anyway.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Royal Hindustan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:29 am

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:31 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Outer Sparta » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:17 am

by Outer Sparta » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:51 am

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:56 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Zottistan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:57 am

by Saiwania » Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:21 am

by Rio Cana » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:01 pm

by Rio Cana » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:05 pm
Saiwania wrote:It looks like I am proven right once again. It was a mistake for Israel to ever relinquish the Sinai back to Egypt. ISIS in Sinai is planning an attack on Israel. My recommended course of action is for the IDF to preemptively mass along the border covertly with concealment and counter invade the Sinai whenever ISIS makes their move and formally annex all of Sinai to Israel permanently as a buffer zone. Any anti-Israel people on the ground can be rooted out and utterly destroyed.
http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Confl ... ael-449314

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:09 pm
Saiwania wrote:It looks like I am proven right once again. It was a mistake for Israel to ever relinquish the Sinai back to Egypt. ISIS in Sinai is planning an attack on Israel. My recommended course of action is for the IDF to preemptively mass along the border covertly with concealment and counter invade the Sinai whenever ISIS makes their move and formally annex all of Sinai to Israel permanently as a buffer zone. Any anti-Israel people on the ground can be rooted out and utterly destroyed.
http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Confl ... ael-449314
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Novus America » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:19 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:Why are we allies of Saudi Arabia, despite the fact they were responsible for 9/11? An oil sanction on them will cripple their economy dearly.
And ours. We depend on their oil imports. Plus, if we embargo one OPEC founding state, we're bringing OPEC's sanctions against the U.S.

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:28 pm
Novus America wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
And ours. We depend on their oil imports. Plus, if we embargo one OPEC founding state, we're bringing OPEC's sanctions against the U.S.
No. We only get 3.5% of our oil from Saudi Arabia. And OPEC is a completely dysfunctional mess. It is no longer a functioning entity just a group of squabbling countries who often hate each other.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: EuroStralia, GuessTheAltAccount, Lingang, Necroghastia, Nilokeras, Spode Humbled Minions, Umeria, World of Krieg
Advertisement