NATION

PASSWORD

Islamic State Crisis Megathread (ISIS/ISIL/IS) II

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should the US deploy ground forces to defeat ISIS

Yes!
136
43%
No!
118
38%
It isn't our fight!
46
15%
Who is ISIS?
13
4%
 
Total votes : 313

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53358
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:35 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Outer Sparta wrote:Why are we allies of Saudi Arabia, despite the fact they were responsible for 9/11? An oil sanction on them will cripple their economy dearly.

The Saudi government is not responsible for 9/11.


Yeah, we all know Bush is.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14639
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Outer Sparta » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:42 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:The Saudi government is not responsible for 9/11.


Yeah, we all know Bush is.

Invading Iraq = forming ISIS.
In solidarity with Ukraine, I will be censoring the letters Z and V from my signature. This is -ery much so a big change, but it should be a -ery positi-e one. -olodymyr -elensky and A-o- continue to fight for Ukraine while the Russians are still trying to e-entually make their way to Kharki-, -apori-h-hia, and Kry-yi Rih, but that will take time as they are concentrated in areas like Bakhmut, -uledar, and other areas in Donetsk. We will see Shakhtar play in the Europa League but Dynamo Kyi- already got eliminated. Shakhtar managed to play well against Florentino Pere-'s Real Madrid who feature superstars like -inicius, Ben-ema, Car-ajal, and -al-erde. Some prominent Ukrainian players that got big transfers elsewhere include Oleksander -inchenko, Illya -abarnyi, and Mykhailo Mudryk.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:43 am

Saiwania wrote:The answer is most obviously yes. But the US shouldn't be doing any of the occupying of territory. The strategy should be to ensure Assad's military recaptures most of Syria with Russia's help, ensure that the Peshmerga hold onto their gains and sit on it, and ensure Iraq's military recaptures most of Iraq with the help of Iran. If ISIS territory first shrinks on all sides, that just leaves a much smaller area that needs to be invaded.

The Sunni portion of Iraq, the area of least value that none of the belligerents want, can be where IS is finally routed and it can promptly be made into a protectorate of Jordan or Saudi Arabia if not an independent Sunni state. A Kurdish state can form in the north, while Iraq is free to become fully Shia like it wanted to.

pssst

Russia pulled out of Syria.
whatever

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:52 am

Ashmoria wrote:Russia pulled out of Syria.


Not entirely, they did so in part because they think their intervention is a resounding success. Syria has captured over 10,000 square kilometers of territory and has made gains in Latakia and Aleppo. Russia needs to keep the S-400 in Syria to keep Turkey's air force out of Syria and any other states in the region wanting to indirectly help Islamic State.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
We Couldnt Agree On A Name
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 485
Founded: Nov 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby We Couldnt Agree On A Name » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:54 am

No. We took the last one. Your turn.
World Assembly Representative: Ms. Adriene Beaumont | "We write legislation here, not dictionaries."
I'll use stats when you fix 443.3

User avatar
Artusia
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Mar 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Artusia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:56 am

Russia is already doing a good enough job if you ask me. We'd be wasting money like we did with W. Bush's wars.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:10 am

Outer Sparta wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Yeah, we all know Bush is.

Invading Iraq = forming ISIS.

No.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Royal Hindustan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 940
Founded: Mar 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Royal Hindustan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:15 am

US oil production has risen over the past few years, so I don't see why the middle east is an absolute necessity to us. It's not our fight anyway.

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:17 am

Royal Hindustan wrote:US oil production has risen over the past few years, so I don't see why the middle east is an absolute necessity to us. It's not our fight anyway.


Its somewhat foolish to assume that this is the only reason the middle east is important.

Moreover, oil prices are affected by petroleum supply from all parts of the globe, so that point is only relevant if the US was somehow not integrated into the global economy and relied on autarchy. That is not the case.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Royal Hindustan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 940
Founded: Mar 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Royal Hindustan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:19 am

Valaran wrote:
Royal Hindustan wrote:US oil production has risen over the past few years, so I don't see why the middle east is an absolute necessity to us. It's not our fight anyway.


Its somewhat foolish to assume that this is the only reason the middle east is important.

Moreover, oil prices are affected by petroleum supply from all parts of the globe, so that point is only relevant if the US was somehow not integrated into the global economy and relied on autarchy. That is not the case.


Ideally oil dependency should decrease over time, and Saudi Arabia and Dubai are still very much stable.

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:21 am

Royal Hindustan wrote:
Ideally oil dependency should decrease over time.


ok, I guess?

, and Saudi Arabia and Dubai are still very much stable


They are not the only places with oil production in the Middle east, certainly not the only places to be bale to affect the west.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:25 am

Royal Hindustan wrote:US oil production has risen over the past few years, so I don't see why the middle east is an absolute necessity to us. It's not our fight anyway.

Yeah oil production rose, so elements of OPEC tanked the market price to trash shale projects in the US.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Royal Hindustan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 940
Founded: Mar 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Royal Hindustan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:29 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Royal Hindustan wrote:US oil production has risen over the past few years, so I don't see why the middle east is an absolute necessity to us. It's not our fight anyway.

Yeah oil production rose, so elements of OPEC tanked the market price to trash shale projects in the US.

US too had a hand in decreasing the oil prices. Why do you think Venezuela blames its eocnomic problems on the US?

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:31 am

Royal Hindustan wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Yeah oil production rose, so elements of OPEC tanked the market price to trash shale projects in the US.

US too had a hand in decreasing the oil prices. Why do you think Venezuela blames its eocnomic problems on the US?

Because the US doesn't deal with Venezuela and they generally hate you.

Venezuela lost out from a couple of OPEC states tanking the market, as did Iran. OPEC as an organisation through a shitfit about it.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14639
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Outer Sparta » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:17 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Outer Sparta wrote:Invading Iraq = forming ISIS.

No.

Why not?
In solidarity with Ukraine, I will be censoring the letters Z and V from my signature. This is -ery much so a big change, but it should be a -ery positi-e one. -olodymyr -elensky and A-o- continue to fight for Ukraine while the Russians are still trying to e-entually make their way to Kharki-, -apori-h-hia, and Kry-yi Rih, but that will take time as they are concentrated in areas like Bakhmut, -uledar, and other areas in Donetsk. We will see Shakhtar play in the Europa League but Dynamo Kyi- already got eliminated. Shakhtar managed to play well against Florentino Pere-'s Real Madrid who feature superstars like -inicius, Ben-ema, Car-ajal, and -al-erde. Some prominent Ukrainian players that got big transfers elsewhere include Oleksander -inchenko, Illya -abarnyi, and Mykhailo Mudryk.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Zottistan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:40 am

Outer Sparta wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No.

Why not?

Why?
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Outer Sparta
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14639
Founded: Dec 26, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Outer Sparta » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:51 am

Zottistan wrote:
Outer Sparta wrote:Why not?

Why?

You overthrow Saddam Hussein and don't install a competent government, then it's instability, civil war, anarchy, and eventually, ISIS forms in Iraq because of the ill-fated Iraq War.
In solidarity with Ukraine, I will be censoring the letters Z and V from my signature. This is -ery much so a big change, but it should be a -ery positi-e one. -olodymyr -elensky and A-o- continue to fight for Ukraine while the Russians are still trying to e-entually make their way to Kharki-, -apori-h-hia, and Kry-yi Rih, but that will take time as they are concentrated in areas like Bakhmut, -uledar, and other areas in Donetsk. We will see Shakhtar play in the Europa League but Dynamo Kyi- already got eliminated. Shakhtar managed to play well against Florentino Pere-'s Real Madrid who feature superstars like -inicius, Ben-ema, Car-ajal, and -al-erde. Some prominent Ukrainian players that got big transfers elsewhere include Oleksander -inchenko, Illya -abarnyi, and Mykhailo Mudryk.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:56 am

Outer Sparta wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:No.

Why not?

Because it's simply not true.
IS is a product of the Iraq War and the Syrian Civil War, that is true - though bear in mind, it's quite specifically due to the coincidence of both conflicts.

But "invading Iraq = forming ISIS" is entirely false.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Zottistan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:57 am

Outer Sparta wrote:
Zottistan wrote:Why?

You overthrow Saddam Hussein and don't install a competent government, then it's instability, civil war, anarchy, and eventually, ISIS forms in Iraq because of the ill-fated Iraq War.

There are a ridiculously high amount of things that could have potentially happened after they overthrew Sadam and a lot of them were positive. Creating a situation in which something could potentially happen and causing that thing to happen are in no way equatable.
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:21 am

It looks like I am proven right once again. It was a mistake for Israel to ever relinquish the Sinai back to Egypt. ISIS in Sinai is planning an attack on Israel. My recommended course of action is for the IDF to preemptively mass along the border covertly with concealment and counter invade the Sinai whenever ISIS makes their move and formally annex all of Sinai to Israel permanently as a buffer zone. Any anti-Israel people on the ground can be rooted out and utterly destroyed.

http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Confl ... ael-449314
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10782
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:01 pm

Seems the OP is not keeping up with current news. With this ceasefire, the Syrian military has been on the march against IS. Add the Kurds who have also done a good job against IS., then US troops are not really needed. Just weapons supplies and air cover is needed. They also say that IS. oil money making enterprise via Turkey has been almost 100% interrupted. No money means IS. cannot buy weapons. Yes, some say some in Turkey were supplying them weapons but I think with the Russian air campaign and public eye on Turkey that the suppliers in Turkey have cutback, at least somewhat, on supplying this group.
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10782
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:05 pm

Saiwania wrote:It looks like I am proven right once again. It was a mistake for Israel to ever relinquish the Sinai back to Egypt. ISIS in Sinai is planning an attack on Israel. My recommended course of action is for the IDF to preemptively mass along the border covertly with concealment and counter invade the Sinai whenever ISIS makes their move and formally annex all of Sinai to Israel permanently as a buffer zone. Any anti-Israel people on the ground can be rooted out and utterly destroyed.

http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Confl ... ael-449314


You do know that would start a big war over there with Egypt. Egypt would most likely welcome these groups to be crushed but they would not accept any other nation to cross into there national territory to do it.
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:09 pm

Saiwania wrote:It looks like I am proven right once again. It was a mistake for Israel to ever relinquish the Sinai back to Egypt. ISIS in Sinai is planning an attack on Israel. My recommended course of action is for the IDF to preemptively mass along the border covertly with concealment and counter invade the Sinai whenever ISIS makes their move and formally annex all of Sinai to Israel permanently as a buffer zone. Any anti-Israel people on the ground can be rooted out and utterly destroyed.

http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Confl ... ael-449314

Oh goodie.

This doesn't have any unfortunate historical implications that are also poetically fitting.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:19 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Outer Sparta wrote:Why are we allies of Saudi Arabia, despite the fact they were responsible for 9/11? An oil sanction on them will cripple their economy dearly.


And ours. We depend on their oil imports. Plus, if we embargo one OPEC founding state, we're bringing OPEC's sanctions against the U.S.


No. We only get 3.5% of our oil from Saudi Arabia. And OPEC is a completely dysfunctional mess. It is no longer a functioning entity just a group of squabbling countries who often hate each other.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:28 pm

Novus America wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
And ours. We depend on their oil imports. Plus, if we embargo one OPEC founding state, we're bringing OPEC's sanctions against the U.S.


No. We only get 3.5% of our oil from Saudi Arabia. And OPEC is a completely dysfunctional mess. It is no longer a functioning entity just a group of squabbling countries who often hate each other.

3.5% is a lot.

OPEC makes up over half of oil imports, and Saudi Arabia is about 40% of that. The Saudis account for about 12.5% of all imports.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: EuroStralia, GuessTheAltAccount, Lingang, Necroghastia, Nilokeras, Spode Humbled Minions, Umeria, World of Krieg

Advertisement

Remove ads