I wouldn't say so much as having the wrong opinion as a few have tried to back up their claims with some stats, most however seem to appeal to emotion in my opinion.
Advertisement

by Grinning Dragon » Wed Mar 23, 2016 5:59 pm

by Need a Name » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:02 pm
Vassenor wrote:Medwind wrote:
Haha, I often feel the same way about liberals. However I don't think I have verbally abused anyone thus far, nor have I witnessed any personal insults or things of that nature. Honestly I wish more liberals would argue in favor of gun control, it would give me a chance to (hopefully) trounce lib view points.
Obviously you've never been around for the times when even suggesting small changes to regulations got you labelled a "gun grabber".

by Medwind » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:12 pm
Need a name wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Obviously you've never been around for the times when even suggesting small changes to regulations got you labelled a "gun grabber".
Well, those times are still around here in the U.S. You should have seen my friends after Obama gave an executive order to, well, bulster already existing laws. "Barack Hussein Obama Bin Laden is takin' muh guns away so he can reveal himself as the Anti-Christ!"
And don't get me started on the NRA...
Oh, and hello again.
However most of the conservatives that I know personally are not stereotypical rednecks or hillbilly's, (not that there's anything wrong with that) They actually tend to be well educated middle class Americans.
by Grinning Dragon » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:17 pm

by Grinning Dragon » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:19 pm
Medwind wrote:Need a name wrote:
Well, those times are still around here in the U.S. You should have seen my friends after Obama gave an executive order to, well, bulster already existing laws. "Barack Hussein Obama Bin Laden is takin' muh guns away so he can reveal himself as the Anti-Christ!"
And don't get me started on the NRA...
Oh, and hello again.
Hey there,
"Barack Hussein Obama Bin Laden is takin' muh guns away so he can reveal himself as the Anti-Christ!" -This gave me a good laugh.However most of the conservatives that I know personally are not stereotypical rednecks or hillbilly's, (not that there's anything wrong with that) They actually tend to be well educated middle class Americans.

by Need a Name » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:20 pm
Medwind wrote:Need a name wrote:
Well, those times are still around here in the U.S. You should have seen my friends after Obama gave an executive order to, well, bulster already existing laws. "Barack Hussein Obama Bin Laden is takin' muh guns away so he can reveal himself as the Anti-Christ!"
And don't get me started on the NRA...
Oh, and hello again.
Hey there,
"Barack Hussein Obama Bin Laden is takin' muh guns away so he can reveal himself as the Anti-Christ!" -This gave me a good laugh.However most of the conservatives that I know personally are not stereotypical rednecks or hillbilly's, (not that there's anything wrong with that) They actually tend to be well educated middle class Americans.

by Need a Name » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:24 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:Medwind wrote:
Hey there,
"Barack Hussein Obama Bin Laden is takin' muh guns away so he can reveal himself as the Anti-Christ!" -This gave me a good laugh.However most of the conservatives that I know personally are not stereotypical rednecks or hillbilly's, (not that there's anything wrong with that) They actually tend to be well educated middle class Americans.
I'd also add that most came to the conclusion that such a thing exceeded his Constitutional authority to do so.

by Medwind » Wed Mar 23, 2016 6:40 pm
Need a name wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:
I'd also add that most came to the conclusion that such a thing exceeded his Constitutional authority to do so.
At least in my case, they just heard that Obama had finally gotten around to taking their guns away. Someone else made the conclusion for the. They didn't read a primary source, hell, they just heard it from some buddies who heard it from some buddies who saw it on a Facebook post.
anyway, I'm beat, so I'm going to head to bed, I'll check out this thread later to see what becomes of it. Bye everyone.
by North Calaveras » Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:51 pm

by Digital Planets » Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:58 pm

by North Calaveras » Wed Mar 23, 2016 7:59 pm
Digital Planets wrote:What we need is less regulations on firearms. If we want to make America safer, the first hurdle is allowing guns on school grounds no bigger than .50cal. We must also allow civilians to load and fire tank weaponry when the need arises.

by Digital Planets » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:02 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Digital Planets wrote:What we need is less regulations on firearms. If we want to make America safer, the first hurdle is allowing guns on school grounds no bigger than .50cal. We must also allow civilians to load and fire tank weaponry when the need arises.
I feel your being very sarcastic...

by Breaking Benjamins Benjamin Burnley » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:07 pm

by Digital Planets » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:09 pm
Breaking Benjamins Benjamin Burnley wrote:All guns should be banned.
But realistically for fascist U.S. they should at least ban all Assault rifles and high caliber weapons that are completely unnecessary.
These fear-mongering hicks only need a handgun to protect themsleves.
You don't need an assualt rifle or high capacity magazine or high caliber guns unless you plan on committing a terrorist attack.
Anybody ever heard of Stun Guns/Tasers? (the ones that shoot electrodes)
You know it's always the end of the world with the conservatives when liberals propose some new laws, right-wingers
are so afraid of change and every time something happens, suddenly liberals want to take everything away and strip you of all your rights etc. and then it's the apoclypse! lol xD
I'm not even going to debate anything because i see how far right-wing these guys are. These types are usually complelely unreasonable, and illogical.

by Grinning Dragon » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:09 pm
North Calaveras wrote:They don't want to take our guns away, they just want to pass more and more regulations, many are arbitrary, so that when you barley slip up they can take them away. In addition, many anti-gunners also want to limit the weapons themselves. So, it's basically laws to restrict/regulate combined with laws to neuter existing weapons.
things like
"assault features"
"Ban on high capacity magazines"
"Assault pistols"
"Bullet buttons"
"Armour piercing ammunition"
the list goes on and on, and there is little compromise.
I live in Hawaii and have had to deal with this bureaucratic nightmare concerning firearms...

by Vaikneland » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:14 pm
Breaking Benjamins Benjamin Burnley wrote:All guns should be banned.
But realistically for fascist U.S. they should at least ban all Assault rifles and high caliber weapons that are completely unnecessary.
These fear-mongering hicks only need a handgun to protect themsleves.
You don't need an assualt rifle or high capacity magazine or high caliber guns unless you plan on committing a terrorist attack.
Anybody ever heard of Stun Guns/Tasers? (the ones that shoot electrodes)
You know it's always the end of the world with the conservatives when liberals propose some new laws, right-wingers
are so afraid of change and every time something happens, suddenly liberals want to take everything away and strip you of all your rights etc. and then it's the apoclypse! lol xD
I'm not even going to debate anything because i see how far right-wing these guys are. These types are usually complelely unreasonable, and illogical.

by Greater Allidron » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:14 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:North Calaveras wrote:They don't want to take our guns away, they just want to pass more and more regulations, many are arbitrary, so that when you barley slip up they can take them away. In addition, many anti-gunners also want to limit the weapons themselves. So, it's basically laws to restrict/regulate combined with laws to neuter existing weapons.
things like
"assault features"
"Ban on high capacity magazines"
"Assault pistols"
"Bullet buttons"
"Armour piercing ammunition"
the list goes on and on, and there is little compromise.
I live in Hawaii and have had to deal with this bureaucratic nightmare concerning firearms...
If you were to ask 10 different folks who are anti-weapon, you will almost get 10 different answers on what constitutes:
Assault features.
High capacity.
Armor piercing ammo. (this one goes into some wild assumptions of ammo/ballistics and lack of understanding of any type of body armor)
Most would answer in such a manner that it all boils down to an appeal to emotion and very light on facts, if any facts are even offered.

by Vaikneland » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:16 pm
and you might want to reconsider who you think is illogical if yore ever in a mass shooting. Because the last thing you'll think, is that you wish you had a gun to stop him before he killed you.Breaking Benjamins Benjamin Burnley wrote:All guns should be banned.
But realistically for fascist U.S. they should at least ban all Assault rifles and high caliber weapons that are completely unnecessary.
These fear-mongering hicks only need a handgun to protect themsleves.
You don't need an assualt rifle or high capacity magazine or high caliber guns unless you plan on committing a terrorist attack.
Anybody ever heard of Stun Guns/Tasers? (the ones that shoot electrodes)
You know it's always the end of the world with the conservatives when liberals propose some new laws, right-wingers
are so afraid of change and every time something happens, suddenly liberals want to take everything away and strip you of all your rights etc. and then it's the apoclypse! lol xD
I'm not even going to debate anything because i see how far right-wing these guys are. These types are usually complelely unreasonable, and illogical.

by Fanosolia » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:18 pm
Vaikneland wrote:and you might want to reconsider who you think is illogical if yore ever in a mass shooting. Because the last thing you'll think, is that you wish you had a gun to stop him before he killed you.Breaking Benjamins Benjamin Burnley wrote:All guns should be banned.
But realistically for fascist U.S. they should at least ban all Assault rifles and high caliber weapons that are completely unnecessary.
These fear-mongering hicks only need a handgun to protect themsleves.
You don't need an assualt rifle or high capacity magazine or high caliber guns unless you plan on committing a terrorist attack.
Anybody ever heard of Stun Guns/Tasers? (the ones that shoot electrodes)
You know it's always the end of the world with the conservatives when liberals propose some new laws, right-wingers
are so afraid of change and every time something happens, suddenly liberals want to take everything away and strip you of all your rights etc. and then it's the apoclypse! lol xD
I'm not even going to debate anything because i see how far right-wing these guys are. These types are usually complelely unreasonable, and illogical.


by North Calaveras » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:19 pm
Vaikneland wrote:and you might want to reconsider who you think is illogical if yore ever in a mass shooting. Because the last thing you'll think, is that you wish you had a gun to stop him before he killed you.Breaking Benjamins Benjamin Burnley wrote:All guns should be banned.
But realistically for fascist U.S. they should at least ban all Assault rifles and high caliber weapons that are completely unnecessary.
These fear-mongering hicks only need a handgun to protect themsleves.
You don't need an assualt rifle or high capacity magazine or high caliber guns unless you plan on committing a terrorist attack.
Anybody ever heard of Stun Guns/Tasers? (the ones that shoot electrodes)
You know it's always the end of the world with the conservatives when liberals propose some new laws, right-wingers
are so afraid of change and every time something happens, suddenly liberals want to take everything away and strip you of all your rights etc. and then it's the apoclypse! lol xD
I'm not even going to debate anything because i see how far right-wing these guys are. These types are usually complelely unreasonable, and illogical.

by Digital Planets » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:19 pm
Vaikneland wrote:and you might want to reconsider who you think is illogical if yore ever in a mass shooting. Because the last thing you'll think, is that you wish you had a gun to stop him before he killed you.Breaking Benjamins Benjamin Burnley wrote:All guns should be banned.
But realistically for fascist U.S. they should at least ban all Assault rifles and high caliber weapons that are completely unnecessary.
These fear-mongering hicks only need a handgun to protect themsleves.
You don't need an assualt rifle or high capacity magazine or high caliber guns unless you plan on committing a terrorist attack.
Anybody ever heard of Stun Guns/Tasers? (the ones that shoot electrodes)
You know it's always the end of the world with the conservatives when liberals propose some new laws, right-wingers
are so afraid of change and every time something happens, suddenly liberals want to take everything away and strip you of all your rights etc. and then it's the apoclypse! lol xD
I'm not even going to debate anything because i see how far right-wing these guys are. These types are usually complelely unreasonable, and illogical.

by Vaikneland » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:22 pm
that's ridiculous. "Oh yes, there's a gunman! I'm going to run faster than a bullet!" Ok that would make sense if you DIDNT have a gun, but if you were in that concert amphitheater in Paris and you caught sight of the shooter (and you had a gun) you wouldn't run, you'd shoot. And all it would take is ONE bullet to stop all those deaths... And proposal you put forward in stopping mass shootings? Because clearly in gun-free France, the terrorist retrieved a gun /:North Calaveras wrote:Vaikneland wrote: and you might want to reconsider who you think is illogical if yore ever in a mass shooting. Because the last thing you'll think, is that you wish you had a gun to stop him before he killed you.
The first thing you will think is to survive by running(which is logical) but don't sit there and act like none of those people in the paris attacks would have passed by having a gun put in their hand.

by Vaikneland » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:23 pm
maybe /:Digital Planets wrote:Vaikneland wrote: and you might want to reconsider who you think is illogical if yore ever in a mass shooting. Because the last thing you'll think, is that you wish you had a gun to stop him before he killed you.
Or maybe he wants to go back to a time where people carried swords and had the balls to stand up against guns.

by Porcfest » Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:25 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Google [Bot], Heavenly Assault, Mearisse, New Ciencia, Rusozak, Thermodolia, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement