Advertisement

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:41 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Teemant » Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:54 am
Raxacoricofallibatorius wrote:I'll be voting to leave and once the Mayoral campaign is done will actively campaign to leave. Personally I think the best circumstance would be to leave the EU but remain in the EEA free trade area.

by Risottia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:51 am
Teemant wrote:Raxacoricofallibatorius wrote:I'll be voting to leave and once the Mayoral campaign is done will actively campaign to leave. Personally I think the best circumstance would be to leave the EU but remain in the EEA free trade area.
Remaining in the EEA would mean that United Kingdom would still have to adopt EU laws and legislations like they do now.

by Risottia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:54 am

by Risottia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:57 am
Socialist Czechia wrote:I am fairly certain, that Canada and Australia are more important for Britain than Finland or Italy.
Or France.


by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:01 am
Risottia wrote:New Benian Republic wrote:There shouldn't be EU mandated military forces, we should instead keep out national armies and hope for the best.
And would be your best hope be? Italy attacking Austria? Poland attacking Sweden over Lithuania?
Because unless you hope for that, national armies are totally useless.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Risottia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:04 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Risottia wrote:And would be your best hope be? Italy attacking Austria? Poland attacking Sweden over Lithuania?
Because unless you hope for that, national armies are totally useless.
There are valid questions over at what point a completely mixed EU army will function well.
Rather having each country maintain "an army" which then shunts brigades and battalions to EU combat zones would be the simplest and least controversial manner it would work.
At the very least, as an early transitional stage.

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 10:07 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Harold I » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:00 am

by Harold I » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:02 am
Teemant wrote:Raxacoricofallibatorius wrote:I'll be voting to leave and once the Mayoral campaign is done will actively campaign to leave. Personally I think the best circumstance would be to leave the EU but remain in the EEA free trade area.
Remaining in the EEA would mean that United Kingdom would still have to adopt EU laws and legislations like they do now.

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:12 am
Harold I wrote:Teemant wrote:
Remaining in the EEA would mean that United Kingdom would still have to adopt EU laws and legislations like they do now.
But we would have the ability to completely ignore legislation that we do not want to pass. And companies would only have to do so if trading to another EU country.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Harold I » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:15 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Harold I wrote:
But we would have the ability to completely ignore legislation that we do not want to pass. And companies would only have to do so if trading to another EU country.
No we wouldn't.
We'd have to abide by rafts of the stuff, without having any input on them.
Unlike now.

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:16 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Risottia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:21 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Yeah, you won't be getting shared materiel for decades in a joint EU army.
There's too much to replace and too much disagreement.
Because, of course, there is no "best".

by Harold I » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:23 am

by Risottia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:24 am

by Harold I » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:28 am
Risottia wrote:Harold I wrote:
But we would have the ability to completely ignore legislation that we do not want to pass.
No.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_ ... bligations

by Stormaen » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:32 am


by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:34 am
Stormaen wrote:So what does everyone think of the government spending £9 million on a pro-EU leaflet drop to every UK house? Not even a balanced one, by the way. It will be openly backing the government's "Remain" stance.![]()
Stormaen wrote:Personally, I don't think taxpayers money should go into this; its £9 million on government propaganda and it means that this referendum won't be a fair fight (not that I expected it would be).
Stormaen wrote:"My argument is not going to be in anyway that Britain can't succeed outside the EU. Of course we could. We're a great country."
– David Cameron, 6 January 2016
"[Leaving the EU] would be an act of economic and political self-harm."
– David Cameron, 4 April 2016
The man either knowingly lied when he said the former or is knowingly lying now by saying the latter. Remember that when you're reading your trusty government information leaflet.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Harold I » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:36 am
Stormaen wrote:So what does everyone think of the government spending £9 million on a pro-EU leaflet drop to every UK house? Not even a balanced one, by the way. It will be openly backing the government's "Remain" stance.![]()
Personally, I don't think taxpayers money should go into this; its £9 million on government propaganda and it means that this referendum won't be a fair fight (not that I expected it would be).
"My argument is not going to be in anyway that Britain can't succeed outside the EU. Of course we could. We're a great country."
– David Cameron, 6 January 2016
"[Leaving the EU] would be an act of economic and political self-harm not to."
– David Cameron, 4 April 2016
The man either knowingly lied when he said the former or is knowingly lying now by saying the latter. Remember that when you're reading your trusty government information leaflet. *cough*propaganda*cough*
You know, if they weren't so pro-EU, the Lib Dems would so have my vote.

by Kazarogkai » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:42 am

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:44 am
Kazarogkai wrote:The nationalist within me that has nothing but hatred for open borders, free trade, and globalization is saying yes to leaving but ultimately it is up to the people of the UK to decide their countries fate and it is no right for me(as I am not from the UK) to tell them what their path for their nation should be. Never the less considering the UK has and remains a strong ally of my nation I will support the UK no matter what they choose. Hopefully the people's come on top in the end and most hopefully this remains a clean fight rather than one filled with demagoguery, fear mongering, and mud throwing on all sides.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Harold I » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:44 am
Kazarogkai wrote:The nationalist within me that has nothing but hatred for open borders, free trade, and globalization is saying yes to leaving but ultimately it is up to the people of the UK to decide their countries fate and it is no right for me(as I am not from the UK) to tell them what their path for their nation should be. Never the less considering the UK has and remains a strong ally of my nation I will support the UK no matter what they choose. Hopefully the people's come on top in the end and most hopefully this remains a clean fight rather than one filled with demagoguery, fear mongering, and mud throwing on all sides.

by Draakonite » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:52 am
Risottia wrote:New Benian Republic wrote:There shouldn't be EU mandated military forces, we should instead keep out national armies and hope for the best.
And would be your best hope be? Italy attacking Austria? Poland attacking Sweden over Lithuania?
Because unless you hope for that, national armies are totally useless.

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:54 am
Draakonite wrote:Risottia wrote:And would be your best hope be? Italy attacking Austria? Poland attacking Sweden over Lithuania?
Because unless you hope for that, national armies are totally useless.
It would be useful to know which divisions would fight less effectively due to a long standing tradition of incompetence or surrenderism while invading norway forOilFreedomTM, when every division had their national uniforms.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Crankblitz, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Eragon Island, Federation of Vanguard, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Juansonia, Kerwa, Kractero, M-101, Primitive Communism, Qwuazaria, Rary, San Lumen, Staidear, Stellar Colonies, Stone Age Electricians, Tarsonis, The Astral Mandate, The North Polish Union, Unitria, Valyxias, Warvick, Z-Zone 3
Advertisement