Oh I expected this. I am still pointing it out.
Advertisement

by Novus America » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:23 pm
by Souseiseki » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:23 pm
Greater Mackonia wrote:I have deemed this a satisfactory result. Any economic problems are utterly secondary to dismantling Social Humanism.

by Camicon » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:23 pm
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the artsThe Trews, Under The Sun
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:25 pm
Greater Mackonia wrote:I have deemed this a satisfactory result. Any economic problems are utterly secondary to dismantling Social Humanism.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Indian Empire » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:25 pm
Greater Mackonia wrote:I have deemed this a satisfactory result. Any economic problems are utterly secondary to dismantling Social Humanism.

by Novus America » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:25 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Well, Obama said the UK's special business partnerships with the US will maintain their status even if Brexit occurs.
http://news.sky.com/story/1717094/obama ... ill-endure
The relationships might be there, but the private investment will not.

by Novus America » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:26 pm
Camicon wrote:Valaran wrote:
Its doubtful, to say the least.
Correct me if I'm wrong but politicians in Scotland have already stated their intent to hold a referendum. And if Northern Ireland went heavily EU, and Scotland looks to be leaving the UK, why wouldn't they explore unifying Ireland? And if the UK looks like it's going to be less a "united Kingdom" and more a "England and Wales Party of Two", well, that's a very different situation than what folks are seeing currently.

by Dooom35796821595 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:26 pm
Kriga wrote:Well...say hello to the end of a union, and an end to economic prosperity.


by Greater Mackonia » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:27 pm
Camicon wrote:Valaran wrote:
Its doubtful, to say the least.
Correct me if I'm wrong but politicians in Scotland have already stated their intent to hold a referendum. And if Northern Ireland went heavily EU, and Scotland looks to be leaving the UK, why wouldn't they explore unifying Ireland? And if the UK looks like it's going to be less a "united Kingdom" and more a "England and Wales Party of Two", well, that's a very different situation than what folks are seeing currently.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:27 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Greater Mackonia » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:28 pm
Indian Empire wrote:Greater Mackonia wrote:I have deemed this a satisfactory result. Any economic problems are utterly secondary to dismantling Social Humanism.
Yeah... If America ends up with Trump, I'm definitely not moving to Britain. It wasn't likely in the first place, now I won't even go there, period. If Trump became President, Germany and Sweden would certainly be on my radar. Any chance of the UK being on my radar just disappeared.

by Stormopolis » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:28 pm

by Souseiseki » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:28 pm
Greater Mackonia wrote:Camicon wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but politicians in Scotland have already stated their intent to hold a referendum. And if Northern Ireland went heavily EU, and Scotland looks to be leaving the UK, why wouldn't they explore unifying Ireland? And if the UK looks like it's going to be less a "united Kingdom" and more a "England and Wales Party of Two", well, that's a very different situation than what folks are seeing currently.
The blathering of Holyrood is utterly irrelevant. All powers on calling a legitimate referendum lie with Westminster, they exist at our behest and can only carry out any meaningful action with our permission. I would not put it past the incompetency of the government to grant them this referendum, but until then this big-talk of "hurr durr there will be a second referendum!" is just meaningless threats.
There shouldn't even be a Scottish parliament.

by Novus America » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:29 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Novus America wrote:
The investment might be. Singapore does just fine. If investors think they can make money off the UK they will invest. In fact now is the time to buy pounds.
Well, yes, what I mean by it is that now that the UK is out of the Eurozone, American companies who had branches in the UK specifically because of the market reach to Europe are now going to have to move many of their jobs to the continent.
That means the investment is not going to be the same.

by Kriga » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:30 pm

by Greater Mackonia » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:30 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Greater Mackonia wrote:I have deemed this a satisfactory result. Any economic problems are utterly secondary to dismantling Social Humanism.
Ah yes, here comes another person who thinks money doesn't matter.
Look, come back and tell me all about money not being important when you actually have a hard choice to make with your money.

by Mad hatters in jeans » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:32 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:32 pm
Greater Mackonia wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Ah yes, here comes another person who thinks money doesn't matter.
Look, come back and tell me all about money not being important when you actually have a hard choice to make with your money.
Ah yes, another person who thinks they're being very intelligent by making up their opponents' arguments and creating vague answers to those made up arguments. Do continue demonstrating your immense intellectual faculties in this fashion, I'm sure you'll be very amusing.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Dooom35796821595 » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:34 pm
Kriga wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Yeah, because no country can survive economically outside a supranational organisation with less then 100 million citizens.
Well, perhaps if Britain had something to offer besides having a strong capital city that has made its economic prosperity on investment and trade, then no...i do not think Britain (or what will be left of it) will survive. Pound will go down and never reach its old grandeur, and the EU will most definitely give us a cold shoulder.
All because some farmers and nationalists wanted to 'reclaim' their sovereignty. Best thing we could have done was to stay and work in an alliance with eurosceptic parties against the collectivist Merkel/Junker bandwagon, rather than leave like cowards. Britain has lost her economic influence, and her place on the world's stage.

by Indian Empire » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:34 pm
Kriga wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Yeah, because no country can survive economically outside a supranational organisation with less then 100 million citizens.
Well, perhaps if Britain had something to offer besides having a strong capital city that has made its economic prosperity on investment and trade, then no...i do not think Britain (or what will be left of it) will survive. Pound will go down and never reach its old grandeur, and the EU will most definitely give us a cold shoulder.
All because some farmers and nationalists wanted to 'reclaim' their sovereignty. Best thing we could have done was to stay and work in an alliance with eurosceptic parties against the collectivist Merkel/Junker bandwagon, rather than leave like cowards. Britain has lost her economic influence, and her place on the world's stage.

by Novus America » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:34 pm
Kriga wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Yeah, because no country can survive economically outside a supranational organisation with less then 100 million citizens.
Well, perhaps if Britain had something to offer besides having a strong capital city that has made its economic prosperity on investment and trade, then no...i do not think Britain (or what will be left of it) will survive. Pound will go down and never reach its old grandeur, and the EU will most definitely give us a cold shoulder.
All because some farmers and nationalists wanted to 'reclaim' their sovereignty. Best thing we could have done was to stay and work in an alliance with eurosceptic parties against the collectivist Merkel/Junker bandwagon, rather than leave like cowards. Britain has lost her economic influence, and her place on the world's stage.

by Tokuopolis » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:35 pm

by Greater Mackonia » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:35 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Greater Mackonia wrote:
Ah yes, another person who thinks they're being very intelligent by making up their opponents' arguments and creating vague answers to those made up arguments. Do continue demonstrating your immense intellectual faculties in this fashion, I'm sure you'll be very amusing.
I mean, I find it amusing that you think as such:
"money problems?! Bah, tough it up Brits! Our ideals of dismantling an ideology I find repugnant is more important than your pockets! Now, who's gonna buy me a beer".
Honestly, it makes me chuckle.

by Neu Leonstein » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:35 pm
Novus America wrote:Singapore does just fine.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Crankblitz, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Eragon Island, Federation of Vanguard, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Juansonia, Kerwa, Kractero, M-101, New Bradfordsburg, Primitive Communism, Qwuazaria, Rary, San Lumen, Staidear, Stellar Colonies, Stone Age Electricians, Tarsonis, The Astral Mandate, The North Polish Union, Unitria, Valyxias, Warvick, Z-Zone 3
Advertisement