Advertisement

by Socialist Czechia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:48 am
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:50 am
Conscentia wrote:Kainesia wrote:I want a country that is sovereign over its own laws. I have no faith in Brussels as a legislature that represents my interests.
1. If we leave won't be able to have any influence in reforming the EU to make it more democratic.
2. And you trust the current UK Parliament to represent your interests? You aren't exactly that influential in a population of ~60 million. Why not have sovereignty for your region? Or county? Or city?

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:53 am
Rufford wrote:I'm a 13 year old British citizen (and yes i am interested in politics) and i think it would be terrible for Britain to leave. However i think Britain will leave as voting to change some thing has become the more attractive option. I think those campaining for brexit have the upper hand as all of the big personalitys want brexit. I think that Britain has to stay as otherwise it would devistate the economy, we woud spend years negotiating trade deals and i expect we would probably end up with boris as PM

by Great Britain Out » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:54 am

by Vassenor » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:54 am
Kainesia wrote:Rufford wrote:I'm a 13 year old British citizen (and yes i am interested in politics) and i think it would be terrible for Britain to leave. However i think Britain will leave as voting to change some thing has become the more attractive option. I think those campaining for brexit have the upper hand as all of the big personalitys want brexit. I think that Britain has to stay as otherwise it would devistate the economy, we woud spend years negotiating trade deals and i expect we would probably end up with boris as PM
I am actually doubtful that we will. It will be close, probably 52-48 or around that ballpark. But I think a sizeable number will chicken out and vote to stay.
But I hope Boris can lead us to victory.

by Vassenor » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:55 am
Great Britain Out wrote:Don't worry my friends, the EU will come to an end and we will all be independent, free to choose our own destinies!

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:56 am
Great Britain Out wrote:Don't worry my friends, the EU will come to an end and we will all be independent, free to choose our own destinies!

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:57 am
Vassenor wrote:Kainesia wrote:
I am actually doubtful that we will. It will be close, probably 52-48 or around that ballpark. But I think a sizeable number will chicken out and vote to stay.
But I hope Boris can lead us to victory.
And what then? What happens if the US and others follow through on their threat and all the promises of trade deals fall apart?

by Vassenor » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:00 am
Kainesia wrote:Vassenor wrote:
And what then? What happens if the US and others follow through on their threat and all the promises of trade deals fall apart?
The UK is one of the biggest economies in the world and a massive net importer. There is no reason why trade deals we have currently would fall apart. We buy more from the rest of the world than they buy from us. Imposing tariffs would benefit no one.

by -Mr Money- » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:02 am

by Socialist Czechia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:02 am

"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

by Valaran » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:02 am
Kainesia wrote:The UK is one of the biggest economies in the world and a massive net importer. We buy more from the rest of the world than they buy from us. Imposing tariffs would benefit no one.
There is no reason why trade deals we have currently would fall apart
Imposing tariffs would benefit no one.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Teemant » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:03 am
-Mr Money- wrote:Trade won't stop if we leave the EU, to those that don't know what Trade is, it is made by businesses and consumers, not by politicians. It is the attractiveness of the consumer market that fuels trade, not whether a country is in a political union or not.

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:07 am
Vassenor wrote:Kainesia wrote:
The UK is one of the biggest economies in the world and a massive net importer. There is no reason why trade deals we have currently would fall apart. We buy more from the rest of the world than they buy from us. Imposing tariffs would benefit no one.
You mean apart from the explicit statement that the US is not interested in trade with an independent UK?

by Valaran » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:08 am
-Mr Money- wrote:Trade won't stop if we leave the EU, to those that don't know what Trade is, it is made by businesses and consumers, not by politicians. It is the attractiveness of the consumer market that fuels trade, not whether a country is in a political union or not.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Socialist Czechia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:09 am
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

by Vassenor » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:09 am
Kainesia wrote:Vassenor wrote:
You mean apart from the explicit statement that the US is not interested in trade with an independent UK?
Source please? That sounds like bullshit to me.
They said that it will be difficult to re-negotiate trade deals because we will be at the back of the queue so to speak, but again, the UK is a big economy, it makes no sense that the U.S would just cut off trade dealings in favour of some country like chad or sierra leone or somewhere.
I find it hard to believe the U.S will place trade deals with Britain as a low priority. I think they are just bluffing to try and keep us in. To avoid making trade deals would harm them as well as us, it is undesirable by all sides.

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:10 am

by Valaran » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:10 am
Kainesia wrote:I find it hard to believe the U.S will place trade deals with Britain as a low priority. I think they are just bluffing to try and keep us in. To avoid making trade deals would harm them as well as us, it is undesirable by all sides.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:11 am
Vassenor wrote:Kainesia wrote:
Source please? That sounds like bullshit to me.
They said that it will be difficult to re-negotiate trade deals because we will be at the back of the queue so to speak, but again, the UK is a big economy, it makes no sense that the U.S would just cut off trade dealings in favour of some country like chad or sierra leone or somewhere.
I find it hard to believe the U.S will place trade deals with Britain as a low priority. I think they are just bluffing to try and keep us in. To avoid making trade deals would harm them as well as us, it is undesirable by all sides.
And what if it isn't just bluster?

by Teemant » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:11 am
Kainesia wrote:Vassenor wrote:
You mean apart from the explicit statement that the US is not interested in trade with an independent UK?
Source please? That sounds like bullshit to me.
They said that it will be difficult to re-negotiate trade deals because we will be at the back of the queue so to speak, but again, the UK is a big economy, it makes no sense that the U.S would just cut off trade dealings in favour of some country like chad or sierra leone or somewhere.
I find it hard to believe the U.S will place trade deals with Britain as a low priority. I think they are just bluffing to try and keep us in. To avoid making trade deals would harm them as well as us, it is undesirable by all sides.

by Vassenor » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:12 am

by Valaran » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:13 am
Kainesia wrote:
Then the U.S would be cutting off their nose to spite their face.
Kainesia wrote:Let's not forget that a vote to leave does not mean we jump off the boat straight away, we will remain in for a couple of years while the logistics of leaving are sorted out.
Trade deals won't just end overnight, we will have several years to re-negotiate them.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:16 am
Valaran wrote:Kainesia wrote:I find it hard to believe the U.S will place trade deals with Britain as a low priority. I think they are just bluffing to try and keep us in. To avoid making trade deals would harm them as well as us, it is undesirable by all sides.
You may find it hard to believe, but the US doesn't. They're 600% our size. They don't give two shits.

by Kainesia » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:17 am
Valaran wrote:Kainesia wrote:
Then the U.S would be cutting off their nose to spite their face.
I think you'll find that we're doing that instead.Kainesia wrote:Let's not forget that a vote to leave does not mean we jump off the boat straight away, we will remain in for a couple of years while the logistics of leaving are sorted out.
Trade deals won't just end overnight, we will have several years to re-negotiate them.
Indeed and uncertainty from that is an even bigger issue than Brexit itself. As has been noted. Repeatedly. One only needs to look at the pound's value these past months.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Hurdergaryp, Spirit of Hope, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement