NATION

PASSWORD

The UK Referendum on Membership of the European Union

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should the UK remain a member of the EU or leave the EU

Remain a member of the EU (UK citizen)
279
18%
Leave the EU (UK citizen)
207
13%
Remain a member of the EU (citizen of other EU member)
146
9%
Leave the EU (citizen of other EU member)
99
6%
Remain a member of the EU (non-EU citizen)
432
27%
Leave the EU (non-EU citizen)
414
26%
 
Total votes : 1577

User avatar
The Twenty-first Reich
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Twenty-first Reich » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:35 am

Great Britain Out wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
I'm rather more interested in what happens in the hypothetical scenario where England narrowly votes to leave, but (assuming, for the sake of argument, a roughly 50/50 split in NI) the UK as a whole votes to stay on the back of strong Scottish and Welsh support for the EU.

Or perhaps London, Scotland, and Wales vote to stay, and thereby keep England in despite England outside of London voting to leave.


That's presuming that Scotland, Wales and London mostly vote to stay in. Welsh and Scottish and London voters are waking up to the fact that it is not good for them or the rest of the country to stay in the EU. I think we'll see a lot more Scottish and Welsh and London voters voting to leave than people think.


Says a lot that your Kingdom Great Britain Out and my Nazi Republic have the same ideology, Inoffensive Centrist. You Nazi.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:35 am

Alyakia wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:I vote in favour of holding a referendum on whether to hold a referendum on where we discuss the UK holding a referendum.


um? what's your legal basis for this?

I give my answer as 1975, Alex.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30584
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:35 am

Alyakia wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
I'm rather more interested in what happens in the hypothetical scenario where England narrowly votes to leave, but (assuming, for the sake of argument, a roughly 50/50 split in NI) the UK as a whole votes to stay on the back of strong Scottish and Welsh support for the EU.

Or perhaps London, Scotland, and Wales vote to stay, and thereby keep England in despite England outside of London voting to leave.


daily express literally explodes


Well at least you understood the point of that post; I'm not sure the others choosing to reply to it really grasped that I was thinking through the implications of an interesting hypothetical rather than making a prediction.

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2760
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:35 am

Alyakia wrote:
Densaner wrote:
The U.K. Remains a unitary state. It's the UK that's a member of the EU, not Scotland.


perhaps, just perhaps, the UK and france are too over-centralized?


Maybe. But that's a different argument to the one we're having.

User avatar
Great Britain Out
Attaché
 
Posts: 89
Founded: Jan 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Britain Out » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:36 am

The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Perhaps you can explain to the class how giving the people a say in their future isn't democratic.


People have elected QUALIFIED REPRESENTATIVES to represent them. That IS democracy.

To return the questions those representatives have been trained and elected to deal with BACK to the people is idiotic. The average Brit has proven absolutely incapable of making an informed or rational decision on this matter and all others in referendums.

It's undemocratic.


So people choosing freely and fairly if they should be in the EU is less democratic than choosing people who have absolutely no power over anything in the EU and can't change anything the unelected, unaccountable Commission do. I don't think so.
_____Proud Brexiteer!_____
If you're a Eurosceptic, come take a look at our campaign,
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=366664

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:37 am

Chartist Socialist Republics wrote:
The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
People have elected QUALIFIED REPRESENTATIVES to represent them. That IS democracy.

To return the questions those representatives have been trained and elected to deal with BACK to the people is idiotic. The average Brit has proven absolutely incapable of making an informed or rational decision on this matter and all others in referendums.

It's undemocratic.

Democracy is rule of the people no? Electing representatives who will rule the people once every few years from a severely limited choice is hardly democratic.

Ideologically nice statement.
Completely infeasible in practice.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Qeiiam Star Cluster
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1257
Founded: Jun 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Qeiiam Star Cluster » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:37 am

Mordakia wrote:
Narintia wrote:I'm Estonian and I was born in the UK, so the memory is a little fazy- but last time we was in a Union 100 million people died.

So, yeah I'm voting to leave.


When the issues run this deep into British and European Identities, can't you, at least, make an informed decision?
Try this

"Britain will negotiate a new EU relationship without being bound by EU law."
How do they think to achieve that? Even countries like Norway and Switzerland need to follow alot of EU regulations.

"It can secure trade deals with other important countries such as China, India and America."
Yeah, except they don't share your optimism.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... -leaves-eu
http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-china- ... AG20151023

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:37 am

The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Perhaps you can explain to the class how giving the people a say in their future isn't democratic.


People have elected QUALIFIED REPRESENTATIVES to represent them. That IS democracy.

To return the questions those representatives have been trained and elected to deal with BACK to the people is idiotic. The average Brit has proven absolutely incapable of making an informed or rational decision on this matter and all others in referendums.

It's undemocratic.


There is actually no requirement to be formally qualified to stand for election beyond a citizenship and residency requirement. So no, "qualified representatives" is not applicable to the House of Commons.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Twenty-first Reich
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Twenty-first Reich » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:37 am

Densaner wrote:
The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
People have elected QUALIFIED REPRESENTATIVES to represent them. That IS democracy.

To return the questions those representatives have been trained and elected to deal with BACK to the people is idiotic. The average Brit has proven absolutely incapable of making an informed or rational decision on this matter and all others in referendums.

It's undemocratic.


Except in certain circumstances where a constitutional matter arises. This is one such circumstance. You have a narrow view of democracy if you think just crossing a box once every few years is the only way democracy works.


This is pointless. If you don't see where the flaw is in letting every uneducated person in a country vote on a matter they don't even begin to comprehend, enjoy the UK out vote getting VETOed.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163860
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:38 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Maybe we should have a referendum on whether the topic of the referendum should leave the megathread or remain in it.


That would suggest that this is a democracy, instead of an insidious social experiment under my Machiavellian control.

<strokes fluffy white cat>

<cackles maniacally>

I keep telling people, doctorates turn you evil.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
The Twenty-first Reich
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Twenty-first Reich » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:38 am

Vassenor wrote:
The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
People have elected QUALIFIED REPRESENTATIVES to represent them. That IS democracy.

To return the questions those representatives have been trained and elected to deal with BACK to the people is idiotic. The average Brit has proven absolutely incapable of making an informed or rational decision on this matter and all others in referendums.

It's undemocratic.


There is actually no requirement to be formally qualified to stand for election beyond a citizenship and residency requirement. So no, "qualified representatives" is not applicable to the House of Commons.


They've been chosen for their qualifying skills.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:38 am

Narintia wrote:I'm Estonian and I was born in the UK, so the memory is a little fazy- but last time we was in a Union 100 million people died.

So, yeah I'm voting to leave.

Fucking.
No.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:38 am

The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
There is actually no requirement to be formally qualified to stand for election beyond a citizenship and residency requirement. So no, "qualified representatives" is not applicable to the House of Commons.


They've been chosen for their qualifying skills.


What do you define as "qualifying skills"?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Twenty-first Reich
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Twenty-first Reich » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:39 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Chartist Socialist Republics wrote:Democracy is rule of the people no? Electing representatives who will rule the people once every few years from a severely limited choice is hardly democratic.

Ideologically nice statement.
Completely infeasible in practice.


Julius Caesar got stabbed for this shit and Athens got destroyed. When will people learn?

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63226
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:39 am

Narintia wrote:
The Qeiiam Star Cluster wrote:We'll call it the Fourth Reich then. Problem solved!


Well, 14,000 got killed the last time we had a reich, so no to that.

And the last time we had a commonwealth, 75,000 people died.

And since this ''USE'' will be led by Germans...

yeah lel no


Well, get out of the EU and NATO then, Estonia, see what happens :')

EU is, in its inception, meant as a way to keep the peace. Before the EU, we had wars ravaging between member states every other decade. Now... not so much. It's a big bag of money, meant to keep the peace.

I will admit that the EU has its fair share of problems, but widespread purging of its citizens isn't one of them. So it is very unfair to equate the EU with either Nazi Germany or the USSR on that ground.
Last edited by The Blaatschapen on Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2760
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:39 am

The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
Densaner wrote:
Except in certain circumstances where a constitutional matter arises. This is one such circumstance. You have a narrow view of democracy if you think just crossing a box once every few years is the only way democracy works.


This is pointless. If you don't see where the flaw is in letting every uneducated person in a country vote on a matter they don't even begin to comprehend, enjoy the UK out vote getting VETOed.


Ah I see. Can't have the proles voting now, can we? You and people like you are the reason I hate the EU.

User avatar
The Twenty-first Reich
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Twenty-first Reich » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:40 am

Vassenor wrote:
The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
They've been chosen for their qualifying skills.


What do you define as "qualifying skills"?


Like knowing what the 0 benefits of leaving the EU are.
And if anyone dares say "We pay them 13 billion a year", UKIP's campaign cost more than that to fund. So fuck you. Disband UKIP, not the EU.

User avatar
Great Britain Out
Attaché
 
Posts: 89
Founded: Jan 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Britain Out » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:41 am

I agree that a lot of British politicians are not actually qualified to run the country, but British Politicians are a lot more qualified to control the UK than 28 people that have not been chosen by the people, cannot be removed, are not British and have no idea what happens in the UK, at a local or national level. At least our politicians are chosen by the people and can be removed if they do a crap job.
_____Proud Brexiteer!_____
If you're a Eurosceptic, come take a look at our campaign,
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=366664

User avatar
The Twenty-first Reich
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Twenty-first Reich » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:41 am

Densaner wrote:
The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
This is pointless. If you don't see where the flaw is in letting every uneducated person in a country vote on a matter they don't even begin to comprehend, enjoy the UK out vote getting VETOed.


Ah I see. Can't have the proles voting now, can we? You and people like you are the reason I hate the EU.


Who talked of Proles? Regardless of class, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, number of toes, criminal record, people who aren't qualified to deal with these situations should have no say in them. Or it becomes an ideological shouting match.

Go ask a tribe of chimps what they think should happen and you'll pretty much have the same situation.

User avatar
The Twenty-first Reich
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Twenty-first Reich » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:42 am

Great Britain Out wrote:I agree that a lot of British politicians are not actually qualified to run the country, but British Politicians are a lot more qualified to control the UK than 28 people that have not been chosen by the people, cannot be removed, are not British and have no idea what happens in the UK, at a local or national level. At least our politicians are chosen by the people and can be removed if they do a crap job.


28 "people" backed by governments which have several thousand workers.

User avatar
Great Britain Out
Attaché
 
Posts: 89
Founded: Jan 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Britain Out » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:42 am

The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
What do you define as "qualifying skills"?


Like knowing what the 0 benefits of leaving the EU are.
And if anyone dares say "We pay them 13 billion a year", UKIP's campaign cost more than that to fund. So fuck you. Disband UKIP, not the EU.


UKIP campaign worth every penny, believe me.
_____Proud Brexiteer!_____
If you're a Eurosceptic, come take a look at our campaign,
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=366664

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:42 am

Well, I have only once thing to say; if you English vote to leave, you will have accomplished De Gaulle's original will to keep the U.K out of the E.U.
So let me ask you now, are you really sure that you want to follow the design of the frenchiest of French? :p
You really should stay just to annoy us.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:43 am

The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
What do you define as "qualifying skills"?


Like knowing what the 0 benefits of leaving the EU are.
And if anyone dares say "We pay them 13 billion a year", UKIP's campaign cost more than that to fund. So fuck you. Disband UKIP, not the EU.


Plus we'd pay a lot less if all the UKIP MEPs weren't hypocritically trying to sponge as much as possible in expenses.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Twenty-first Reich
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Dec 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Twenty-first Reich » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:43 am

Great Britain Out wrote:
The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
Like knowing what the 0 benefits of leaving the EU are.
And if anyone dares say "We pay them 13 billion a year", UKIP's campaign cost more than that to fund. So fuck you. Disband UKIP, not the EU.


UKIP campaign worth every penny, believe me.


I hope a white UKIP member rapes your family and then an immigrant helps you out by giving you a fiver.

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2760
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:44 am

The Twenty-first Reich wrote:
Densaner wrote:
Ah I see. Can't have the proles voting now, can we? You and people like you are the reason I hate the EU.


Who talked of Proles? Regardless of class, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, number of toes, criminal record, people who aren't qualified to deal with these situations should have no say in them. Or it becomes an ideological shouting match.

Go ask a tribe of chimps what they think should happen and you'll pretty much have the same situation.


Wow you really are something. Do you have to go to Oxbridge or Eton? There is no set qualification to be a politician.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ioudaia, Nlarhyalo, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Plan Neonie, Tarsonis, Tungstan, Zetaopalatopia

Advertisement

Remove ads