Wallenburg wrote:The Rich Port wrote:... I'm not disagreeing with you on whether it's as wrong as incest. If anything, this would support what your were arguing with Jumalaarik about.
You specifically called necrophilia a sexual perversion.However... You think it's simple, otherwise you wouldn't immediately jump on the bandwagon saying it's "no more different than any other sexual interest".
It's PLENTY different.
A foot fetish isn't even the same SPORT as necrophilia.
http://www.yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawmanWhich is why I object to it being paired with consensual incest on the same bill.
It's like some guy trying to legalize zoophilia along with homosexuality.
No, it isn't. That's a false analogy. Zoophilia inherently involves a lack of consent.
... No I didn't. Where did I say that?
It's a paraphilia, as opposed to a DISORDER. A disorder has to be PATHOLOGICAL. Necrophilia, as you so helpfully pointed out, can be NON-PATHOLOGICAL, ergo, NOT A DISORDER/ILLNESS/WHATEVER POP PSYCHOLOGY TERMINOLOGY IS USED NOWADAYS.
... So, you think necrophilia isn't as simple as other paraphilia, then, and we can leave it out of the bill putting it alongside incest?
... And in most cases of necrophilia, consent is a huge problem, hence why the Liberals have proposed a rather clever solution of including it for some people. Hence why most of the U.S. has laws against the desecration of graves... Something people don't fucking appreciate, living or dead.