I assume that I receive the approval for one single modicum of decency.

Advertisement

by Chinese Peoples » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:22 pm


by Saiwania » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:26 pm

by Chinese Peoples » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:28 pm
Saiwania wrote:I'm in favor of the Republicans blocking any replacement appointments because lets face it- the GOP has everything to lose by cooperating with Obama, Clinton, or Sanders. I will go a step further and recommend that the Republicans block any SCOTUS nominations until the bitter end, until the Republican majority in the US congress is very quickly voted out.

by Ifreann » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:28 pm
Saiwania wrote:I'm in favor of the Republicans blocking any replacement appointments because lets face it- the GOP has everything to lose by cooperating with Obama, Clinton, or Sanders. I will go a step further and recommend that the Republicans block any SCOTUS nominations until the bitter end, until the Republican majority in the US congress is voted out.

by Wisconsin9 » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:30 pm
Ifreann wrote:Saiwania wrote:I'm in favor of the Republicans blocking any replacement appointments because lets face it- the GOP has everything to lose by cooperating with Obama, Clinton, or Sanders. I will go a step further and recommend that the Republicans block any SCOTUS nominations until the bitter end, until the Republican majority in the US congress is voted out.
That is patent insanity.

by The Princes of the Universe » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:33 pm
Saiwania wrote:I'm in favor of the Republicans blocking any replacement appointments until there is a new US president because lets face it- the GOP has everything to lose by cooperating with Obama, Clinton, or Sanders. I will go a step further and recommend that the Republicans block any SCOTUS nominations until the bitter end, until the Republican majority in the US congress is voted out.

by Renewed Dissonance » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:45 pm
Tsaraine wrote:Of all the Supreme Court Justices, Scalia seemed the one least likely to base his decisions on sound legal reasoning, and most likely to say whatever the fuck came to mind at the time in an effort to justify his own personal biases. If there were a decision I disagreed with, but the reasoning behind it seemed sound, that would be one thing. A decision I agreed with, but the reasoning was unsound, that would be another. Scalia made decisions I disagreed with based on poor reasoning; it's the latter part that makes me think he was a poor occupant of the highest bench in the land.

by Greed and Death » Sat Feb 13, 2016 8:49 pm
Ifreann wrote:Saiwania wrote:I'm in favor of the Republicans blocking any replacement appointments because lets face it- the GOP has everything to lose by cooperating with Obama, Clinton, or Sanders. I will go a step further and recommend that the Republicans block any SCOTUS nominations until the bitter end, until the Republican majority in the US congress is voted out.
That is patent insanity.

by Renewed Dissonance » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:08 pm

by Neutraligon » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:23 pm

by Renewed Dissonance » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:26 pm
Geilinor wrote:Scalia's worst quote:Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached.

by The Greater Ohio Valley » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:35 pm

by The Black Forrest » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:43 pm

by Galloism » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:45 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:I didn't like the man. Thought he was too much of an ideologue. I wouldn't wish death on him nor will I celebrate it. I am sure the party of no will be fighting this with everything they have.

by Luminesa » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:45 pm


by Wallenburg » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:47 pm
Galloism wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:I didn't like the man. Thought he was too much of an ideologue. I wouldn't wish death on him nor will I celebrate it. I am sure the party of no will be fighting this with everything they have.
I don't care how much of a majority republicans have in Congress, they can't reverse death.
Yet.

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:48 pm
Galloism wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:I didn't like the man. Thought he was too much of an ideologue. I wouldn't wish death on him nor will I celebrate it. I am sure the party of no will be fighting this with everything they have.
I don't care how much of a majority republicans have in Congress, they can't reverse death.
Yet.

by Galloism » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:49 pm

by The Princes of the Universe » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:49 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:50 pm

by Greed and Death » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:51 pm
Galloism wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:I didn't like the man. Thought he was too much of an ideologue. I wouldn't wish death on him nor will I celebrate it. I am sure the party of no will be fighting this with everything they have.
I don't care how much of a majority republicans have in Congress, they can't reverse death.
Yet.

by Galloism » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:52 pm
by Wallenburg » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:52 pm


by Luminesa » Sat Feb 13, 2016 9:54 pm

by Liriena » Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:21 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, Cannot think of a name, Dimetrodon Empire, Gallade, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Necroghastia, Pizza Friday Forever91, Republica de Sierra Nevada, Rusozak, Ryemarch, San Lumen, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, The Selkie, Theodores Tomfooleries, Vassenor, Zurkerx
Advertisement