NATION

PASSWORD

Obama for Supreme Court?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Would or would you not consider appointing Obama to the US Supreme Court.

I would consider appointing Obama to the US Supreme Court.
63
33%
I would absolutely not consider appointing Obama to the US Supreme Court.
127
67%
 
Total votes : 190

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55582
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:23 pm

Kalifati Arab shqiptar wrote:Yes and a federal prison afterwards.


I am going to regret this.........why?
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Carronia
Secretary
 
Posts: 29
Founded: Jun 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Carronia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:25 pm

Wallenburg wrote:
Kernen wrote:He's really not, though.

He was a professor of constitutional law and the leader of the free world. That isn't exactly a paltry record.



We wasn't a professor - he was a lecturer and a senior lecturer. There is a difference

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55582
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:25 pm

Carronia wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:He was a professor of constitutional law and the leader of the free world. That isn't exactly a paltry record.



We wasn't a professor - he was a lecturer and a senior lecturer. There is a difference


And?
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
New confederate ramenia
Minister
 
Posts: 2987
Founded: Oct 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New confederate ramenia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:26 pm

Nariterrr wrote:Why not. He's open-minded, progressive, and would make a excellent judge on the panel (if he gets appointed.)

That's something legislators or Presidents should be, not Supreme Court Justices.
probando

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10904
Founded: May 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Romulan Republic » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:31 pm

He would not be my first choice, because some of his administrations' actions have been, in my opinion, serious violations of civil liberties (including NS9 spying and persecution of whistleblowers). However, he is undoubtably qualified (I seem to recall that before he was President, he was at one point a constitutional law professor). He's also fairly young, meaning it would be a long time before he could be replaced by some Republican wack job. And his appointment would piss the Right off to no end.

Of course, that last reason means they'd probably fight viciously to block his appointment.

Of course, their is another issue that comes to mind: As a Supreme Court Justice, Obama would likely face cases involving policies he enacted. Seems like bias/a conflict of interest to me.
Last edited by The Romulan Republic on Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes" When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy." - President Abraham Lincoln.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10384
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:31 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Carronia wrote:

We wasn't a professor - he was a lecturer and a senior lecturer. There is a difference


And?

And that the fact is he was never a professor.
He had a Voluntary Surrender of his law license, which would indicate something wasn't kosher with the Bar Assoc.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:35 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
And?

And that the fact is he was never a professor.
He had a Voluntary Surrender of his law license, which would indicate something wasn't kosher with the Bar Assoc.

That's untrue. http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
According to FactCheck, the Obamas voluntarily went inactive so they wouldn't have to keep paying the annual fee.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:36 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Well on one hand he's a political figure and his appointment might hurt the legitimacy of the court so no. On the other hand he's never served as a judge so no.

Justice Kagan never served as a judge yet she's on the Supreme Court
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Reagan-land
Diplomat
 
Posts: 564
Founded: Nov 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Reagan-land » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:37 pm

If I was the president I would keep Obama as far away from that court as possible.

edit: If a Republican candidate wins, he has a rats chance in hell of being appointed
Last edited by Reagan-land on Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:38 pm

Kokotov wrote:It'd be moderately fun to see this happen. After all, what President can say they have served in all three branches of government?

This Guy
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm

Nariterrr wrote:Why not. He's open-minded, progressive, and would make a excellent judge on the panel (if he gets appointed.)


Not really... in fact the idea is absurd. He has no real judicial experience. A part time lecturer at UC doesn't really count...

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Kokotov wrote:It'd be moderately fun to see this happen. After all, what President can say they have served in all three branches of government?

This Guy

Two, actually. Taft was never in Congress.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Greater North American Union
Envoy
 
Posts: 255
Founded: Nov 25, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater North American Union » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Kokotov wrote:It'd be moderately fun to see this happen. After all, what President can say they have served in all three branches of government?

This Guy


The largest moving object made by a humen before the Titanic.
National Information
Nation Name(s): "The American Union", "The Union", "The Union of American States" (UAS) | Govt. Type: Constitutional Federal Republic | Denonym: American/Americans
This Nation is based on an idealized and tongue-in-cheek version of Theodore Roosevelt-style American Progressivism and Imperialism, and may not accurately represent the poster's views
"Judge a man not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character" - -Rev. Martin Luther King Jr
"We can have no "50/50" allegiance in this country. Either a man is an American and nothing else, or he is not an American at all"--President Theodore Roosevelt
LvL 30 Weeaboo and Ammosexual
>tfw your raifu will never be real

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:40 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Well on one hand he's a political figure and his appointment might hurt the legitimacy of the court so no. On the other hand he's never served as a judge so no.

Justice Kagan never served as a judge yet she's on the Supreme Court


She also has an active legal career... Obama really does not.

User avatar
United States of Conner
Minister
 
Posts: 2449
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Conner » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:41 pm

If he wants to, I don't see why not.
Guns are tools, not toys.

User avatar
Politically Correct Fascist Feminists
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Jan 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Politically Correct Fascist Feminists » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:41 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Thermodolia wrote: Justice Kagan never served as a judge yet she's on the Supreme Court


She also has an active legal career... Obama really does not.


We need more diversity on the supreme court, its filled with old, white, privileged men.

User avatar
New confederate ramenia
Minister
 
Posts: 2987
Founded: Oct 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New confederate ramenia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:43 pm

Politically Correct Fascist Feminists wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
She also has an active legal career... Obama really does not.


We need more diversity on the supreme court, its filled with old, white, privileged men.

We have too many old white men in power in general, which is why we should all be voting for Bernie Sanders.
probando

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:44 pm

Politically Correct Fascist Feminists wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
She also has an active legal career... Obama really does not.


We need more diversity on the supreme court, its filled with old, white, privileged men.


Yeah like Thomas Clarence, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Ginsburg...

In any case there are plenty of brilliant legal minds that are "diverse." Obama is not and never has been one of those minds.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:44 pm

United States of Conner wrote:If he wants to, I don't see why not.


Really? How about virtually no real career in law.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:45 pm

Kernen wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:He doesn't want it, so no. He's certainly qualified, though.

He's really not, though.

Actually he is because there are no official requirements, there's already a Justice that has never been a judge before on SCOTUS right now.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Politically Correct Fascist Feminists
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Jan 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Politically Correct Fascist Feminists » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:45 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Politically Correct Fascist Feminists wrote:
We need more diversity on the supreme court, its filled with old, white, privileged men.


Yeah like Thomas Clarence, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Ginsburg...

In any case there are plenty of brilliant legal minds that are "diverse." Obama is not and never has been one of those minds.


Obama has done many great things, except I wish he was more progressive.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:47 pm

Politically Correct Fascist Feminists wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Yeah like Thomas Clarence, Kagan, Sotomayor, and Ginsburg...

In any case there are plenty of brilliant legal minds that are "diverse." Obama is not and never has been one of those minds.


Obama has done many great things, except I wish he was more progressive.


Whatever. Point is Obama is not qualified to be Supreme Court justice. Not even close to it.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:48 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:This Guy

Two, actually. Taft was never in Congress.

Close enough
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
New Frenco Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7787
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Frenco Empire » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:49 pm

I mean, I don't think he'd be that awful of a choice, but I doubt he'd really want to.
NEW FRENCO EMPIRE

Transferring information from disorganized notes into presentable factbooks is way too time consuming for a procrastinator. Just ask if you have questions.
Plutocratic Evil Empire™ situated in a post-apocalyptic Decopunk North America. Extreme PMT, yet socially stuck in the interwar/immediate post-war era, with Jazz music and flapper culture alongside nanotechnology and Martian colonies. Tier I power of the Frencoverse.


Las Palmeras wrote:Roaring 20s but in the future and with mutants

Alyakia wrote:you are a modern poet
Top Hits of 2132! (Imperial Public Radio)
Coming at you from Fort Orwell! (Imperial Forces Network)



User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:51 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Politically Correct Fascist Feminists wrote:
Obama has done many great things, except I wish he was more progressive.


Whatever. Point is Obama is not qualified to be Supreme Court justice. Not even close to it.

There are no qualifications for SCOTUS. If I became president I could nominate you if I wanted to.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arval Va, Atlantic Isles, Czechostan, Elejamie, Floofybit, Fractalnavel, Frokolia, Habsburg Mexico, Haganham, Hispida, Hrofguard, Juansonia, La Cocina del Bodhi, Nationalist Northumbria, Neo-American States, New Ciencia, Port Caverton, Ryemarch, San Lumen, Tarsonis, The Archregimancy, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Two Jerseys

Advertisement

Remove ads