NATION

PASSWORD

Obama for Supreme Court?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Would or would you not consider appointing Obama to the US Supreme Court.

I would consider appointing Obama to the US Supreme Court.
63
33%
I would absolutely not consider appointing Obama to the US Supreme Court.
127
67%
 
Total votes : 190

User avatar
Espoalia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Jan 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Obama for Supreme Court?

Postby Espoalia » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:15 pm

The Role of the US Supreme Court

The Supreme Court plays a vital role within the United States' government. The Constitution grants the Court an expressed power which is known as a Judicial Review. Essentially, the US Supreme Court has the ability to "check" the actions of Congress and the President himself. Therefore, the Justices decide whether the law would be constitutional or unconstitutional. Do not forget that the other two branches can also "check" the Supreme Court. The President has the power to nominate the Justices, but the Senate must vote their approval of the nominees.


MSNBC 1/26/16 06:31 PM

The Place for Politics
By: Alex Seitz-Wald

"Obama for Supreme Court? Clinton is open to the idea..."

As the Iowa Caucus is rapidly approaching, a potential voter openly questioned Secretary Clinton during a town hall meeting. The voter asked if she, Hillary, would be willing to nominate soon to be former President Barack Obama to the US Supreme Court if she was elected as the next president. Clinton seem somewhat surprised by such a question, but she responded with, "That's a great idea." Hillary also stated, "I would certainly take that under advisement. I mean, he is brilliant and he can set forth an argument." Without the majority of the seats in the Senate being Democrat, it would be highly unlikely to get a majority vote for Obama to be approved even if she would happen to appoint him. Anyway, he seems to be uninterested in the notion of such a job right now. Obama later said, "I think that being a Justice is a little bit too monastic for me." In fact, the only other president to serve on the US Supreme Court was Taft. You decide! If you were the next elected president, would or would you not consider appointing Obama to the US Supreme Court.

User avatar
Nariterrr
Minister
 
Posts: 2435
Founded: Jan 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Nariterrr » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:24 pm

Why not. He's open-minded, progressive, and would make a excellent judge on the panel (if he gets appointed.)
Honestly who knows what about anything anymore.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:26 pm

Let the man rest.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Nariterrr
Minister
 
Posts: 2435
Founded: Jan 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Nariterrr » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:27 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:Let the man rest.

Whatever he wants.
Honestly who knows what about anything anymore.

User avatar
Independent Republic of Not My Problem
Envoy
 
Posts: 279
Founded: May 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Independent Republic of Not My Problem » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:28 pm

Yeah, that's what America needs. A former President that endorses laws forcing Americans to engage in involuntary commerce, and issues death warrants on American citizens through executive fiat, serving on the Supreme Court.

User avatar
Jordkloden
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1098
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jordkloden » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:29 pm

If he wants to. And I doubt he does.
I’m a communist. Not much else to say.

User avatar
The Sykren
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Sykren » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:30 pm

Independent Republic of Not My Problem wrote:Yeah, that's what America needs. A former President that endorses laws forcing Americans to engage in involuntary commerce, and issues death warrants on American citizens through executive fiat, serving on the Supreme Court.

Eh, there's been worse guys on courts everywhere. If he wants the job I won't oppose him.
Capitalist genocidal space porcupines galore!
The flag has nothing to do with the country.

User avatar
Stormaen
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1395
Founded: Mar 15, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Stormaen » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:34 pm

Not likely. I can see the arguments for why but I just think he's too political a figure to appoint to the Supreme Court. If you think conservatives are up in arms now, just imagine if Obama got on to SCOTUS..!

Also, I think his wife has political ambitions (I'm thinking probably more UN than US) which I think would – if they lasted – perhaps discourage any acceptance of a SCOTUS appointment.
Falklands Forever! “Malvinas” Never!
Free West Papua


User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66763
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:35 pm

Independent Republic of Not My Problem wrote:Yeah, that's what America needs. A former President that endorses laws forcing Americans to engage in involuntary commerce, and issues death warrants on American citizens through executive fiat, serving on the Supreme Court.


I'm confused. What are we ranting on now?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Coalition of Minor Planets
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Jan 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Coalition of Minor Planets » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:36 pm

Definitely not. He'd fit right in with most of them, and that's not a good thing

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72165
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:38 pm

Honestly, he's too far right for my tastes, but if Scalia he was replacing, that would be a good change. Definitely a good change.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Internationalist Bastard
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24520
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Internationalist Bastard » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:39 pm

Is that even legal?
Call me Alex, I insist
I am a girl, damnit
Slut Pride. So like, real talk, I’m a porn actress. We’re not all bimbos. I do not give out my information or videos to avoid conflict with site policy. I’m happy to talk about the industry or my thoughts on the career but I will not be showing you any goodies. Sorry
“Whatever you are, be a good one” Abe Lincoln

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:39 pm

Well on one hand he's a political figure and his appointment might hurt the legitimacy of the court so no. On the other hand he's never served as a judge so no.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72165
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:40 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:Is that even legal?

Once he leaves office, yeah. They could appoint Halle Barry if they wanted.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Giovenith
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 21395
Founded: Feb 08, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Giovenith » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:40 pm

Nah. I'm fine with the guy, but I don't really see that as at all forseeable.
⟡ and in time, and in time, we will all be stars ⟡

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:41 pm

Far too divisive and could really bite the Democrats back in the arse. I wouldn't call it good politics.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Urran
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14434
Founded: Jan 22, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Urran » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:42 pm

Does he even meet the requirments?
A lie doesn't become truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it's accepted by a majority.
Proud Coastie
The Blood Ravens wrote: How wonderful. Its like Japan, and 1950''s America had a baby. All the racism of the 50s, and everything else Japanese.

I <3 James May

I wear teal, blue & pink for Swith
❤BITTEN BY THE VAMPIRE QUEEN OF COOKIES❤

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72165
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:42 pm

Urran wrote:Does he even meet the requirments?

What requirements?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:42 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:Far too divisive and could really bite the Democrats back in the arse. I wouldn't call it good politics.

How exactly would it bite the democrats in the ass?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:43 pm

It's not likely. He would have to pass a Senate vote and even if there was a Democratic Senate I suspect the president would choose someone much less well-known.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Zrhajan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 952
Founded: Nov 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zrhajan » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:44 pm

To be fair, there is precedent for sufficiently qualified ex-presidents to become members of the supreme court.
5D Political Test: Communist Pro-Government World-Federalist Bleeding-Heart Libertine
Collectivism score: 83%
Authoritarianism score: 33%
Internationalism score: 83%
Tribalism score: -100%

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:45 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Far too divisive and could really bite the Democrats back in the arse. I wouldn't call it good politics.

How exactly would it bite the democrats in the ass?

Because the Republicans. They never cease to amaze me in ways they spin shit (Obama's birth certificate, Obama's birthplace, Obama's 'socialism', Obama's 'communism', pretty much anything Republicans say etc) and than manage to get a large portion of the country on board with it. The last thing which is needed when there are Governorships, state legislatures and Congress to take back. There's no need to make it a headline when they could go for a safer option that is also a liberal.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54368
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:45 pm

Only if the U.S. is really running short on sane people to put in positions of power.

User avatar
Ndaku
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1249
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Ndaku » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:45 pm

The man's grown a full head of gray hair, give him a break.
'Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom: For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables. But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.' (II Timothy 4:1-5 NKJV)

Non-denominational Christian. Savopia is my WA puppet nation. Feel free to telegram me!

User avatar
Kokotov
Attaché
 
Posts: 77
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kokotov » Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:46 pm

It'd be moderately fun to see this happen. After all, what President can say they have served in all three branches of government?
Just underwent government revitalization!

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arval Va, Atlantic Isles, Czechostan, Elejamie, Floofybit, Fractalnavel, Frokolia, Habsburg Mexico, Haganham, Hispida, Hrofguard, Juansonia, La Cocina del Bodhi, Nationalist Northumbria, Neo-American States, New Ciencia, Port Caverton, Ryemarch, San Lumen, Tarsonis, The Archregimancy, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Two Jerseys

Advertisement

Remove ads