NATION

PASSWORD

Fears grow of repeat of 2008 financial crash

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Will there be another reccession in the United States?

Yes
44
51%
No
13
15%
I don't know
10
11%
No, it won't. Suck it commies, USA USA USA USA.
12
14%
I like Totalbiscuit.
8
9%
 
Total votes : 87

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:55 pm

Hilsbrad wrote:The world economic collapse is coming!

The US should default on its debt and bring risk into treasury bonds and end the ridiculousness that the world financial infrastructure is built around it.

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30395
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby USS Monitor » Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:04 pm

Old-snake wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
Like the football team? No wonder it's been having so many problems. Everyone knows football players aren't smart enough to run the economy.

Are the members of this football team named JD, AL, TR, and TJ?


I have no idea. I don't watch football. I was making a stupid joke about the New England Patriots. What are you talking about?
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
NationStates issues editors may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Samnoreg
Diplomat
 
Posts: 502
Founded: Sep 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Samnoreg » Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:06 pm

I don't know if it's just me thinking this, but the cycle of variable growth and panicky crisis is a bit of an odd way to keep an economy. Sure, there'll be good times and bad, but crisis capitalism shouldn't be the rule of the day.
Samnoreg
Det Norrøne Samveldet

SRK Radio 1 | You're listening to SRK Verldstjenesten | Køpenhavn: ☀/☁ 13˚/3˚ | Oslo: ☂ 16˚/3˚ | Stockholm: ☁ 15˚/9˚

· Overview
· Etymology
· Politics
· Overview
Politikk
Left-Social Democrat.
Pro: Post-Capitalism | Environmentalism | The Up North
Anti: Neoliberalism | Totalitarianism | Warm Weather
Man, fascists are total dweebs, maaan.

User avatar
Arkinesia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13210
Founded: Aug 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkinesia » Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:14 pm

Khadgar wrote:Is there a massive bubble in any given sector? No? Then it won't be a repeat of 2008 and no one with sense should suggest it is.

Yeah, it will just be a stock market correction, nothing more most likely. It happens.
Bisexual, atheist, Southerner. Not much older but made much wiser.

Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.

User avatar
Arkinesia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13210
Founded: Aug 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkinesia » Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:18 pm

Samnoreg wrote:I don't know if it's just me thinking this, but the cycle of variable growth and panicky crisis is a bit of an odd way to keep an economy. Sure, there'll be good times and bad, but crisis capitalism shouldn't be the rule of the day.

It will keep going like this until interest rates are bumped up. This Keynesian notion that short-term interest rate cuts are a long-term economic plan is clearly untrue.
Bisexual, atheist, Southerner. Not much older but made much wiser.

Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:24 pm

Khadgar wrote:Is there a massive bubble in any given sector? No? Then it won't be a repeat of 2008 and no one with sense should suggest it is.

Maybe in energy, but unlike housing once that hits the depleted prices tend to drive economic activity.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
U n i t y
Diplomat
 
Posts: 686
Founded: Mar 08, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby U n i t y » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:00 pm

There is no bubble in America. However, there are bubbles in China now. The Great Recession was made in America. The next one will be made in China. Your right, America is relatively stable right now. However, China is accruing too much unsustainable debt.

User avatar
Lancaster of Wessex
Senator
 
Posts: 4999
Founded: Feb 21, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lancaster of Wessex » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:08 pm

2008 was brought on by Lehman Brothers as a domestic shock to the US that spread shockwaves globally. This time around it's largely foreign stimuli that are affecting the markets, namely China obviously and the collapse in oil prices. China still has impressive growth, albeit apparently set for the lowest in 25 years, but it's still outpacing the Western world. If OPEC would get its head out of its ass and cut production - which I doubt they'll do - oil too could stabilize. I don't think we're set for a repeat of 2008 quite yet, but things could change if there are international crises, e.g.

I also don't see the Fed raising rates again for a while in such a tumultuous environment.
Last edited by Lancaster of Wessex on Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lancaster.
Duke of the Most Ancient and Noble House of Lancaster of Wessex

The Most High, Potent, and Noble Prince, Lancaster, By the Grace of God, Duke of Wessex, Protector of the Enclaved Pious Estates of The Church of Wessex, Lord of Saint Aldhelm Islands, Prince and Great Steward of Celtic Wessex, Keeper of the Great Seal of the Duchy and House of Lancaster of Wessex, Sovereign of the Most Ancient and Illustrious Order of the Gold Gryphon, etc.

User avatar
Rusozak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5988
Founded: Jun 14, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Rusozak » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:10 pm

Kind of a broad poll question. There's going to be another recession some day. It's just the nature of a capitalist system. But I don't think it's going to happen anytime in the next year unless some unforeseeable event happens that triggers a tidal wave of economic chaos.
NOTE: This nation's government style, policies, and opinions in roleplay or forum 7 does not represent my true beliefs. It is purely for the enjoyment of the game.

User avatar
U n i t y
Diplomat
 
Posts: 686
Founded: Mar 08, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby U n i t y » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:14 pm

Lancaster of Wessex wrote:2008 was brought on by Lehman Brothers as a domestic shock to the US that spread shockwaves globally. This time around it's largely foreign stimuli that are affecting the markets, namely China obviously and the collapse in oil prices. China still has impressive growth, albeit apparently set for the lowest in 25 years, but it's still outpacing the Western world. If OPEC would get its head out of its ass and cut production - which I doubt they'll do - oil too could stabilize. I don't think we're set for a repeat of 2008 quite yet, but things could change if there are international crises, e.g.

I also don't see the Fed raising rates again for a while in such a tumultuous environment.

The low growth in China has spooked global markets. What I am concerned about is not the low growth in China but the debt used to achieve that growth. China's debt is growing far faster than America's debt did before the Great Recession. Debt causes recessions. China's debt is also massive compared to GDP. Also, China is spending four -ten dollars of debt to achieve just one dollar of growth. That is completely unsustainable! Saudi Arabia has raised oil production to put Iran and the US out of business in the oil business. Its working too.

The Fed, in my opinion, will be raising rates still because the US economy is still going strong.

User avatar
Lancaster of Wessex
Senator
 
Posts: 4999
Founded: Feb 21, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lancaster of Wessex » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:24 pm

U n i t y wrote:
Lancaster of Wessex wrote:2008 was brought on by Lehman Brothers as a domestic shock to the US that spread shockwaves globally. This time around it's largely foreign stimuli that are affecting the markets, namely China obviously and the collapse in oil prices. China still has impressive growth, albeit apparently set for the lowest in 25 years, but it's still outpacing the Western world. If OPEC would get its head out of its ass and cut production - which I doubt they'll do - oil too could stabilize. I don't think we're set for a repeat of 2008 quite yet, but things could change if there are international crises, e.g.

I also don't see the Fed raising rates again for a while in such a tumultuous environment.

The low growth in China has spooked global markets. What I am concerned about is not the low growth in China but the debt used to achieve that growth. China's debt is growing far faster than America's debt did before the Great Recession. Debt causes recessions. China's debt is also massive compared to GDP. Also, China is spending four -ten dollars of debt to achieve just one dollar of growth. That is completely unsustainable! Saudi Arabia has raised oil production to put Iran and the US out of business in the oil business. Its working too.

The Fed, in my opinion, will be raising rates still because the US economy is still going strong.


I don't think debt is the sole cause of recessions, but it certainly would exacerbate things.

I can't see the Fed raising rates too much or for too long if they're one of the only central banks in the West doing so. It'll push the dollar up too high making, as you know, US exports less and less competitive to buy.
Lancaster.
Duke of the Most Ancient and Noble House of Lancaster of Wessex

The Most High, Potent, and Noble Prince, Lancaster, By the Grace of God, Duke of Wessex, Protector of the Enclaved Pious Estates of The Church of Wessex, Lord of Saint Aldhelm Islands, Prince and Great Steward of Celtic Wessex, Keeper of the Great Seal of the Duchy and House of Lancaster of Wessex, Sovereign of the Most Ancient and Illustrious Order of the Gold Gryphon, etc.

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:29 pm

greed and death wrote:
Khadgar wrote:Is there a massive bubble in any given sector? No? Then it won't be a repeat of 2008 and no one with sense should suggest it is.

Maybe in energy, but unlike housing once that hits the depleted prices tend to drive economic activity.

Also, there may be a lot of people who work in oil extraction and refining, but the total economic impact of them losing their jobs is far less than a significant amount of home owners defaulting on their mortgages.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:38 pm

greed and death wrote:
Khadgar wrote:Is there a massive bubble in any given sector? No? Then it won't be a repeat of 2008 and no one with sense should suggest it is.

Maybe in energy, but unlike housing once that hits the depleted prices tend to drive economic activity.

The decline in energy prices caused a recession in Canada but we'll be fine. Energy is only a small part of our economy.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Lancaster of Wessex
Senator
 
Posts: 4999
Founded: Feb 21, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lancaster of Wessex » Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:42 pm

Geilinor wrote:
greed and death wrote:Maybe in energy, but unlike housing once that hits the depleted prices tend to drive economic activity.

The decline in energy prices caused a recession in Canada but we'll be fine. Energy is only a small part of our economy.


It was a technical recession but it was extremely brief. We are, however, being pounded by said low energy prices with our dollar reaching decade plus lows...
Lancaster.
Duke of the Most Ancient and Noble House of Lancaster of Wessex

The Most High, Potent, and Noble Prince, Lancaster, By the Grace of God, Duke of Wessex, Protector of the Enclaved Pious Estates of The Church of Wessex, Lord of Saint Aldhelm Islands, Prince and Great Steward of Celtic Wessex, Keeper of the Great Seal of the Duchy and House of Lancaster of Wessex, Sovereign of the Most Ancient and Illustrious Order of the Gold Gryphon, etc.

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:24 pm

Socialist Tera wrote:
Alyakia wrote:even the capitalist economics admit that capitalism operations on a cycle of growth and recession. the communists say the collapses will get progressively closer together and worse. death is certain.

I have studied basic Keynesian economics. I understand the method. I think it will get worse and worse but each boom will be smaller. I just though the boom would be bigger.


Keynesian economics doesn't postulate this scenario.

The Serbian Empire wrote:Secondly, the US debt crisis caused by oil prices this low is really more a hard recession in oil shale areas of Texas and North Dakota.


What US debt crisis? Seriously, the 10-year TIPS yield is still only 0.7%, meaning that the market thinks that US Government bonds are literally safer than houses.

The Republic of American Freedom wrote:Don't worry I already have enough food, water, guns and gold to survive this.


What use is gold, should things turn to a post-apocalyptic wasteland?

Uxupox wrote:
Brickistan wrote:Not really surprising that the economy would crash again soon.

We haven't learned anything from the 2008 crash. The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer and it's all business as usual.


Don't think this has something to do with the next crash on the stock market.


Not directly, no. But the key ingredient to a sustained recovery is a prosperous middle class, and that's missing. In large part, it's because wealth is so concentrated in a few pairs of hands at the top.
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:44 pm

Arkinesia wrote:
Samnoreg wrote:I don't know if it's just me thinking this, but the cycle of variable growth and panicky crisis is a bit of an odd way to keep an economy. Sure, there'll be good times and bad, but crisis capitalism shouldn't be the rule of the day.

It will keep going like this until interest rates are bumped up. This Keynesian notion that short-term interest rate cuts are a long-term economic plan is clearly untrue.

They aren't a long-term economic plan, that's why the Fed is going to raise them as circumstances allow.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:11 pm

Alyakia wrote:even the capitalist economics admit that capitalism operations on a cycle of growth and recession. the communists say the collapses will get progressively closer together and worse. death is certain.


Er. Ups and downs are necessary, even normal. It's not "death" and it has gotten better progressively.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:46 pm

Geilinor wrote:
greed and death wrote:Maybe in energy, but unlike housing once that hits the depleted prices tend to drive economic activity.

The decline in energy prices caused a recession in Canada but we'll be fine. Energy is only a small part of our economy.

It is a little more complicated than that. And I feel a little embarrassed.

Since my quantitative finance guy calculated oil would not go below 80 dollars a barrel we actually created a securitized oil future and then we started using them for collateralize debt swaps with other banks and then these CDS were rehypothecated and yeah so bets on oil going up is actually a large part of all of our financial system now like maybe 10 or 15 trillion dollars.

But it should not worry anyone since I am sure we can get the oil prices back above 80 a barrel by next month. If not I received a large bonus that is now safely in govnerment bonds and I am a position to short the market.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Wallenburg
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 22345
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:56 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Alyakia wrote:even the capitalist economics admit that capitalism operations on a cycle of growth and recession. the communists say the collapses will get progressively closer together and worse. death is certain.


Er. Ups and downs are necessary, even normal. It's not "death" and it has gotten better progressively.

I don't see how the Great Depression was necessary.
I want to improve.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
King of Snark, General Assembly Secretary, Arbiter for The East Pacific


User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm

Wallenburg wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Er. Ups and downs are necessary, even normal. It's not "death" and it has gotten better progressively.

I don't see how the Great Depression was necessary.


It wasn't. And it didn't start out as an economic depression. It became one the moment Hoover decided to tighten the money supply, raised taxes and increased tariffs.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:59 pm

Wallenburg wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:
Er. Ups and downs are necessary, even normal. It's not "death" and it has gotten better progressively.

I don't see how the Great Depression was necessary.

Our response to a down in the stock market went a long way to making that depression great.

1. We mismanaged our currency which was not surprising given the central bank with less than 20 years in Existence was running the worlds currency.

2. we started a global trade war
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:02 pm

This is nothing like the 2008 financial crash... Like, at all.

The biggest catalyst was the crash of the housing market, which collapsed the many Collateralized Debt Obligations on the market.

CDOs are basically junk bonds, except they're gigantic groups of junk bonds all smushed together. Basically guaranteed for some portion of them to default.

They depend solely on cash flow.

Watching the tickers means nothing unless we understand what's causing the downturn.

Nothing was fixed after the 2008 crash. Banks continue to be de-regulated despite risk-taking behavior and predatory lending are still common practice.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:07 pm

The Rich Port wrote:This is nothing like the 2008 financial crash... Like, at all.

The biggest catalyst was the crash of the housing market, which collapsed the many Collateralized Debt Obligations on the market.

CDOs are basically junk bonds, except they're gigantic groups of junk bonds all smushed together. Basically guaranteed for some portion of them to default.

They depend solely on cash flow.

Watching the tickers means nothing unless we understand what's causing the downturn.

Nothing was fixed after the 2008 crash. Banks continue to be de-regulated despite risk-taking behavior and predatory lending are still common practice.

Banks manage risk that is literally the entire point of banking to manage risk.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Wallenburg
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 22345
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:10 pm

The Rich Port wrote:This is nothing like the 2008 financial crash... Like, at all.

The biggest catalyst was the crash of the housing market, which collapsed the many Collateralized Debt Obligations on the market.

CDOs are basically junk bonds, except they're gigantic groups of junk bonds all smushed together. Basically guaranteed for some portion of them to default.

They depend solely on cash flow.

Watching the tickers means nothing unless we understand what's causing the downturn.

Nothing was fixed after the 2008 crash. Banks continue to be de-regulated despite risk-taking behavior and predatory lending are still common practice.

Banks exist to take risks with other people's money. That is their fundamental business model.
I want to improve.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
King of Snark, General Assembly Secretary, Arbiter for The East Pacific


User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm

greed and death wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:This is nothing like the 2008 financial crash... Like, at all.

The biggest catalyst was the crash of the housing market, which collapsed the many Collateralized Debt Obligations on the market.

CDOs are basically junk bonds, except they're gigantic groups of junk bonds all smushed together. Basically guaranteed for some portion of them to default.

They depend solely on cash flow.

Watching the tickers means nothing unless we understand what's causing the downturn.

Nothing was fixed after the 2008 crash. Banks continue to be de-regulated despite risk-taking behavior and predatory lending are still common practice.

Banks manage risk that is literally the entire point of banking to manage risk.


... They don't seem to be very good at it.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, Aldygast, Ankoz, Elejamie, Enormous Gentiles, Galloism, IdIoTs InC, ImperialRussia, Kenowa, Nantoraka, Oceasia, Port Caverton, Primitive Communism, Reloviskistan, Senscaria, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, Techocracy101010, The Sherpa Empire, Washington Resistance Army, Xmara, Z-Zone 3

Advertisement

Remove ads