Why aren't you a Pan-Leftist?

[Prussia-Steinbach]

I'm also American. Conservatism means wanting things to stay the same, and I don't think you want America to stay the same. You're a right-winger, but not conservative.

Okay I suppose that's one way to look at it

edit: as for me wanting America to stay the same or change? I sure as hell don't want Obamas "Hope'n change" crap to stay.. so yeah I want it to change you could say

So you're a reactionary.

[Ararat Mountain]

I'm also American. Conservatism means wanting things to stay the same, and I don't think you want America to stay the same. You're a right-winger, but not conservative.

That is by far, one of the most ironic comments ever posted. That's like saying you're left-winger, but not progressive.

Left-wingers now are by far the 'regressive'

[New Reagan-land]

For me, it goes to show how immature liberals are when handed power. I'm a big freedom of speech fan so I would never ban someone just for being a communist or any of the various political identities I disagree with....

You realize almost every Conservative that was a president limited freedom-of-speech. Some limited a lot more than just freedom of speech.

I'm reffering to most liberals in America nowadays being into the whole "political correctness" scheme whereas conservatives are strongly against it

[New Reagan-land]

Okay I suppose that's one way to look at it

edit: as for me wanting America to stay the same or change? I sure as hell don't want Obamas "Hope'n change" crap to stay.. so yeah I want it to change you could say

So you're a reactionary.

Its synonymous with right winger, so sure why not

[Prussia-Steinbach]

So you're a reactionary.

Its synonymous with right winger, so sure why not

No, it isn't.

[Ararat Mountain]

Its synonymous with right winger, so sure why not

No, it isn't.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More

[Kubra]

aw hey we all gotta spam somewhere

You have more posts than me. That means you have higher class consciousness than me. Thus, you should become a revolutionary leader in the vanguard.

One spam post at a time will bring us all closer to the lolvolution!!!

you can apply that to literally any political ideology bruv
we're all sad, isolated internetizens regardless of our affiliations.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

No, it isn't.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactionary
"A reactionary is a person who holds political views that favor a return to the status quo ante, the previous political state of society, which they believe possessed characteristics (discipline, respect for authority, etc.) that are negatively absent from the contemporary status quo of a society. As an adjective, the word reactionary describes points of view and policies meant to restore the status quo ante."

Not all right-wingers are reactionary. Plenty are conservative. Some are even revolutionary.

[Aramnia]

Literally every political system and economic system that has ever been tried has been terrible for the people. There hasn't been a single polity with any actual significance in Human history that was problem-free.

And there never will be as long as human nature exists. And that wil and I don't think anyone wants that to go away. But socialism (god forbid communism) , is much worse compared to Capitalism, where people have rights, ideas, inventions, can actually make money.

Yes, because in Communism, people can't have rights, ideas, or inventions. /s

[Jochistan]

And there never will be as long as human nature exists. And that wil and I don't think anyone wants that to go away. But socialism (god forbid communism) , is much worse compared to Capitalism, where people have rights, ideas, inventions, can actually make money.

Yes, because in Communism, people can't have rights, ideas, or inventions. /s

That's frequently the outcome.

[Hladgos]

I'm a pansexual leftist, yes.

[Arach-Naga Combine]

I DO hold pans with my left hand.

Or does this refer to left brain hemisphere dominance as per standard Troll vocabulary?

Because I don't think it's about my sexual preference for monstergirls.

[Aramnia]

Yes, because in Communism, people can't have rights, ideas, or inventions. /s

That's frequently the outcome.

Please give me an example of a fully stable Communistic society that has ever existed on which you can base that assertion and give evidence.

[New Reagan-land]

Yes, because in Communism, people can't have rights, ideas, or inventions. /s

That's frequently the outcome.

He refers strictly to the idea of communism and doesn't give much attention to the actual affects and attempts at it in real life

[New Reagan-land]

That's frequently the outcome.

Please give me an example of a fully stable Communistic society that has ever existed on which you can base that assertion and give evidence.

see^

edit: out of curiosity do you think we should attempt to establish a communist country again?

[Prussia-Steinbach]

Yes, because in Communism, people can't have rights, ideas, or inventions. /s

That's frequently the outcome.

Communism's never been achieved on a large scale, for us to know that. Stop lying.

[New Reagan-land]

That's frequently the outcome.

Communism's never been achieved on a large scale, for us to know that. Stop lying.

Do you believe we should attempt to create a new communist society?

edit: its just a yes or no question

[Aramnia]

That's frequently the outcome.

He refers strictly to the idea of communism and doesn't give much attention to the actual affects and attempts at it in real life

That tends to happen when one defends an ideology. Then there's also the fact that, as I said before, "Communist country" is an oxymoron. We've seen intermediary states whose efforts have ended in disaster, at least some of those partially because of outside capitalistic influences. All you're saying is "let's look at these things that weren't Communism and call them Communism." I'll grant that they were attempts, but what you're ultimately doing is calling things that weren't Communism Communism, which should rightly be called out as nonsense.

[New Reagan-land]

He refers strictly to the idea of communism and doesn't give much attention to the actual affects and attempts at it in real life

That tends to happen when one defends an ideology. Then there's also the fact that, as I said before, "Communist country" is an oxymoron. We've seen intermediary states whose efforts have ended in disaster, at least some of those partially because of outside capitalistic influences. All you're saying is "let's look at these things that weren't Communism and call them Communism." I'll grant that they were attempts, but what you're ultimately doing is calling things that weren't Communism Communism, which should rightly be called out as nonsense.

Well, do you believe humanity should take another go at attempting to create a communist society?

edit: its a yes or no question

[The Hobbesian Metaphysician]

This sounds a lot like the "why aren't you an afro-centrist?" thread.

[Aramnia]

That tends to happen when one defends an ideology. Then there's also the fact that, as I said before, "Communist country" is an oxymoron. We've seen intermediary states whose efforts have ended in disaster, at least some of those partially because of outside capitalistic influences. All you're saying is "let's look at these things that weren't Communism and call them Communism." I'll grant that they were attempts, but what you're ultimately doing is calling things that weren't Communism Communism, which should rightly be called out as nonsense.

Well, do you believe humanity should take another go at attempting to create a communist society?

edit: its a yes or no question

Yes. And please learn the difference between "it's" and "its."

[New Reagan-land]

Well, do you believe humanity should take another go at attempting to create a communist society?

edit: its a yes or no question

Yes. And please learn the difference between "it's" and "its."

Thank you for my grammar lesson..?

[Jochistan]

This sounds a lot like the "why aren't you an afro-centrist?" thread.

Good times

[Aramnia]

Yes. And please learn the difference between "it's" and "its."

Thank you for my grammar lesson..?

One of my peeves. I don't nitpick about grammar too much, but if I see someone consistently making the same errors, I'll correct them. It's not a great habit.

[Jochistan]

That's frequently the outcome.

Communism's never been achieved on a large scale, for us to know that. Stop lying.

That's because it's a hypothetical utopia. Based on a system of building it made through little more than working class nationalism and class warfare.

Utopias, much less utopias to be built through total extermination of entire groups of people, are basically unachievable.