I have nothing more to say to you about the PC(USA) here. Feel free to find your sources and bring them to me in the Christian Discussion Thread.
Advertisement

by Kannap » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:06 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:08 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Kannap wrote:
So what, perhaps Tom likes kissing Brad. Perhaps Tom and Brad like holding hands. Perhaps Tom and Brad want to be married and adopt children together. Perhaps throughout their entire life journey, Tom and Brad remain celibate.
Perhaps Tom and Brad repent of their sin.
If Tom and Brad are kissing, then obviously there is some sort of sexual attraction going on.

by Kannap » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:08 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Kannap wrote:
So what, perhaps Tom likes kissing Brad. Perhaps Tom and Brad like holding hands. Perhaps Tom and Brad want to be married and adopt children together. Perhaps throughout their entire life journey, Tom and Brad remain celibate.
Perhaps Tom and Brad repent of their sin.
If Tom and Brad are kissing, then obviously there is some sort of sexual attraction going on.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:08 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Grand Calvert wrote:No because Peter did not exercise authority over other congregations. He was the Bishop of Rome, but being the Bishop of Rome at that time is not like what it is today.
Explain what has changed? The Fisherman was the leader of the first congregation and his descendants are the leader of God's church on earth. If you want to appeal to history then why aren't you following the original church of Christ?

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:09 pm

by The Flutterlands » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:10 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Kannap wrote:
So what, perhaps Tom likes kissing Brad. Perhaps Tom and Brad like holding hands. Perhaps Tom and Brad want to be married and adopt children together. Perhaps throughout their entire life journey, Tom and Brad remain celibate.
Perhaps Tom and Brad repent of their sin.
If Tom and Brad are kissing, then obviously there is some sort of sexual attraction going on.

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:10 pm

by Fartsniffage » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:11 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Explain what has changed? The Fisherman was the leader of the first congregation and his descendants are the leader of God's church on earth. If you want to appeal to history then why aren't you following the original church of Christ?
What about eastern churches that claim to be founded by Jesus?

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:11 pm

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:12 pm

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:14 pm

by Kannap » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:15 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:16 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Nationes Pii Redivivi wrote:
Really, because every time you kiss your high school sweetheart, you are really thinking about porking her, right? Again, this is your unworldliness speaking, you have no idea how humans work, do you?
I don't have any "sweethearts" thank you. And let's be honest, when people kiss in the romantic context, sexual urges are usually fueling it. It doesn't always lead to sex but that's the basic instinct behind it

by Grand Calvert » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:18 pm

by Kannap » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:19 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Nationes Pii Redivivi wrote:
Really, because every time you kiss your high school sweetheart, you are really thinking about porking her, right? Again, this is your unworldliness speaking, you have no idea how humans work, do you?
I don't have any "sweethearts" thank you. And let's be honest, when people kiss in the romantic context, sexual urges are usually fueling it. It doesn't always lead to sex but that's the basic instinct behind it
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:20 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:
Try again this, try again that. I don't need to "try again". Tom and Brad can go open up a Bible and realize that God's design for the human family is one man and one woman (and kids). I don't care if they don't have sex, it still goes against God's design.

by Conscentia » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:20 pm
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by New confederate ramenia » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:23 pm
Zoo Trouble wrote:Does anyone know what the Christians are called that reject the Pauline Epistles? I believe most of the marriage mumbo jumbo comes from Paul in the NEw Testament, but I could be wrong.

by Kannap » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:24 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:
Try again this, try again that. I don't need to "try again". Tom and Brad can go open up a Bible and realize that God's design for the human family is one man and one woman (and kids). I don't care if they don't have sex, it still goes against God's design.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Conscentia » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:28 pm
Grand Calvert wrote:Kannap wrote:Kissing =/= sex
Try again.
Try again this, try again that. I don't need to "try again". Tom and Brad can go open up a Bible and realize that God's design for the human family is one man and one woman (and kids). I don't care if they don't have sex, it still goes against God's design.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:29 pm
Kauthar wrote:i would be happy but anglicans are heretics, i would go as far as saying infidels.

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:30 pm
Kannap wrote:Grand Calvert wrote:Try again this, try again that. I don't need to "try again". Tom and Brad can go open up a Bible and realize that God's design for the human family is one man and one woman (and kids). I don't care if they don't have sex, it still goes against God's design.
Ah, so if Sally and Thomas are infertile and therefore cannot have children, does God hate them because they cannot conform to "God's design" of a family being one man, one woman, and children?
Perhaps Jennifer and Greg love each other but don't want to have children, so they just adopt some dogs instead and never have children during their lives. Does God hate them for not conforming to his design of a family being one man, one woman, and children?
What if, like Tom and Brad, a couple named Megan and George remain celibate and never have sex? Perhaps they're both asexual and have no interest in having sex and simply want to cuddle and kiss each other on the cheeks? Does God hate Megan and George?

by The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:30 pm

by The Flutterlands » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:34 pm
Nationes Pii Redivivi wrote:Kannap wrote:
Ah, so if Sally and Thomas are infertile and therefore cannot have children, does God hate them because they cannot conform to "God's design" of a family being one man, one woman, and children?
Perhaps Jennifer and Greg love each other but don't want to have children, so they just adopt some dogs instead and never have children during their lives. Does God hate them for not conforming to his design of a family being one man, one woman, and children?
What if, like Tom and Brad, a couple named Megan and George remain celibate and never have sex? Perhaps they're both asexual and have no interest in having sex and simply want to cuddle and kiss each other on the cheeks? Does God hate Megan and George?
Apparently, his God would have been too busy hating everyone to send his only begotten son to wash us of our sin.

by The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:35 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ealdracaland, EuroStralia, Grinning Dragon, Majestic-12 [Bot], Neu California, Ostroeuropa, Perikuresu, The Pirateariat, Xind
Advertisement