Do you realize that there is a grave difference between a corporation and a cooperative? Obviously you don´t and this 1 of the gravest mistakes many people make.
I do. And that changes nothing.
And again this is planned economy where the party literally runs and controlls the economy, in fascism this is not the case, the companies are still owned and ran by corporate owners. They are also in private hands as well and not in public hands like the state for example. There is a huge difference here that you just brush aside as it it didn´t exist.
In any communist system like the one my RL county had, it was government that controlled all corporations. In short, they served the government, were managed by it, etc. The principle of control was far more masked, but in fact it was in Nazi germany where corporate property was nominal.
If you are to short sighted to even realize these simple differences then I can´t help you. But nonetheless you are false i´m sorry.
Next: First of all: Mussolini just like hitler used Popular socialist SLOGANS to gain supporters and rise to power. All fascists except for the ones set up by the west like batista in fact did this, be it mussolini, franco, shek or hitler. Hitler for example promised to also abolish interest rates in 1930, and wrote a lot on that. As soon as he was in power in 1933 nothing changed and interest rates continued to exist as they had before. It is the same game with mussolini adopting a populist line to gather in supporters ro rise to power. And as soon as he was in power like hitler, he kept capitalism and rather went for corporatism, examples of that in history and their corporate policies are rampant and to many to even count.
Secondly: No this was neither done in italy nor in nazigermany if you read about their economies and how they were managed. As of such it is easy to see that this was nothing but a populist shame to gather voters. And again it is a common practive, even today, for fascists to lure in voters by making socialist promises.
And what evidences you have that communist don't use popular slogans to deceive the population into electing them, because government ownership of all means of production gives them money beyond grasp of any CEO?
Next point: Way to go to totally take things out of context. With dictatorship the dictatorship of the proletariat is meant, i.e. the dictatorship of the workers. And guess what a dictatorship of the masses results in? It results inevitably in democracy actually. Also if you read marx and engels you will see whilst they took from hegels ideas and refined them, they also criticized his ideas in a lot of other areas. There is in fact an entire pamplethe by marx and engels dedicated to the criticism oh hegel. And 1 point criticized by marx and engels was in fact hegels statist realsocialist system. Which lenin then later took on to change that into the vanguard theory using a realsocialist model of hegel which is meant as a temporar vanguard to guide a society from feudalism or capitalism towards socialism. This is what the entire vanguard theory bases on.
Point me please to one socialist state where the "democracy", was achieved. I have yet to see a communist party in power not followed by massive bloodbath. After all, isn't communism about revolution?
Also one has to ask if what you say is true, then how come that concepts like the dictatorship of the proletariat, council communism/democracy, social democracy, direct democracy etc. All were put into existance by mostly communist scholars?
As said you totally take things out of historical context here and again show us that you literally understood nothing about socialism and communism in history, nor their theory, at all.
Direct democracy has nothing to do with socialism. Remaining ones are... sufficient to say, not positive in my opinion, for very simple reason. Communism aims for an uptopian (perfect) society, and utopian society can't tolerate pluralism of opinion, because they strive away from perfection.
