Sort of. being "asexual" is little more than having a really low sex drive.
Advertisement

by Tafhan » Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:45 pm
|We are few, but we are bitter|

by Tafhan » Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:46 pm
|We are few, but we are bitter|

by The Grey Wolf » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:55 pm

by Scanzian Freehold » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:01 am
The Grey Wolf wrote:Tafhan wrote:Sort of. being "asexual" is little more than having a really low sex drive.
The name itself should have given it away (a+sexuality) that it means a lack of sexual attraction to anyone. Were it what you described, then they would just be heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual.

by Farnhamia » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:03 am
Scanzian Freehold wrote:The Grey Wolf wrote:
The name itself should have given it away (a+sexuality) that it means a lack of sexual attraction to anyone. Were it what you described, then they would just be heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual.
What a strange sub-thread for a discussion on reissuing Mein Kampf... But, yes. "Low Sex Drive" is not equal to Asexuality; it is merely a lack of libido, possibly a hormonal imbalance, possibly a combo with psychological inhibition. Asexuality, on the other hand, is a complete disinterest of anything relating to sexual response, possibly but not necessarily including a complete revulsion of anything pertaining to intimacy with others, or even with oneself.

by Scanzian Freehold » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:06 am
Farnhamia wrote:Scanzian Freehold wrote:
What a strange sub-thread for a discussion on reissuing Mein Kampf... But, yes. "Low Sex Drive" is not equal to Asexuality; it is merely a lack of libido, possibly a hormonal imbalance, possibly a combo with psychological inhibition. Asexuality, on the other hand, is a complete disinterest of anything relating to sexual response, possibly but not necessarily including a complete revulsion of anything pertaining to intimacy with others, or even with oneself.
<looms ominously> Yes, very strange. Back on topic, please.

by Free Missouri » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:12 am

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:15 am
Free Missouri wrote:Seriously, couldn't even go a post without breaking Godwin's Law.

by USS Monitor » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:24 am
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Free Missouri wrote:Seriously, couldn't even go a post without breaking Godwin's Law.
The only way to "break" Godwin's Law is to not mention Hitler or the Nazis. Godwin's Law isn't a fallacy or anything of the sort, it's the assertion that the longer a discussion on the internet goes, the more likely it is that Hitler or the Nazis will be mentioned.
Considering this is a thread about a book written by fucking Hitler, I don't think bitching about this is necessary or constructive.

by Free Missouri » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:27 am
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Free Missouri wrote:Seriously, couldn't even go a post without breaking Godwin's Law.
The only way to "break" Godwin's Law is to not mention Hitler or the Nazis. Godwin's Law isn't a fallacy or anything of the sort, it's the assertion that the longer a discussion on the internet goes, the more likely it is that Hitler or the Nazis will be mentioned.
Considering this is a thread about a book written by fucking Hitler, I don't think bitching about this is necessary or constructive.

by Vashta Nerada » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:32 am


by The Rich Port » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:32 am

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:34 am
Free Missouri wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:The only way to "break" Godwin's Law is to not mention Hitler or the Nazis. Godwin's Law isn't a fallacy or anything of the sort, it's the assertion that the longer a discussion on the internet goes, the more likely it is that Hitler or the Nazis will be mentioned.
Considering this is a thread about a book written by fucking Hitler, I don't think bitching about this is necessary or constructive.
Can't take a joke?
ah, didn't think so.
anyways...
Freedom of Speech prevails, yay!

by Impaled Nazarene » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:39 am
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."

by USS Monitor » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:39 am
The Rich Port wrote:Honestly, I never opposed them banning it.
Even though I'm a goddamn Ray Bradbury Anti-Book Censorship Army Sergeant... I made an exception.
Because even we have fucking standards.
But, like I said before, it's their choice.
Sad to say, but people still read it likes it's goddamn genius or something.
Hitler, from what I can tell from the English translation, barely had an understanding of grammatical cohesion, let alone the capability of writing anything worthy of being deemed a "masterpiece" of anything.
Fucking teenagers wrote better than the motherfucker.

by USS Monitor » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:40 am
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Considering the amount of Islamophobia is in Europe now we might as well just invade Germany right now.

by Impaled Nazarene » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:41 am
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."

by The Rich Port » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:41 am
USS Monitor wrote:The Rich Port wrote:Honestly, I never opposed them banning it.
Even though I'm a goddamn Ray Bradbury Anti-Book Censorship Army Sergeant... I made an exception.
Because even we have fucking standards.
But, like I said before, it's their choice.
Sad to say, but people still read it likes it's goddamn genius or something.
Hitler, from what I can tell from the English translation, barely had an understanding of grammatical cohesion, let alone the capability of writing anything worthy of being deemed a "masterpiece" of anything.
Fucking teenagers wrote better than the motherfucker.
A lot of the people who read it like it's genius are just doing it to be edgy. If the book didn't have such a taboo around it, it wouldn't be as edgy and they wouldn't find it so alluring.

by Eol Sha » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:43 am

by Farnhamia » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:49 am

by Impaled Nazarene » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:52 am
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."

by The Rich Port » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:02 am
Eol Sha wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Let's not and say we did.
Obama calls up Merkel: "We own Berlin, Dresden, and Frankfurt now. Deal with it." *hangs up*
Merkel looks to staffer: "Just Barack and one of his noon prank calls again. Bring me the folder marked 'Ten Steps to Economic Slavery of Your Neighbors'", Klaus."

by USS Monitor » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:02 am


by Free Missouri » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:08 am
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Considering the amount of Islamophobia is in Europe now we might as well just invade Germany right now.

by Scanzian Freehold » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:18 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Cachard Calia, Edush, Elejamie, Grinning Dragon, Kerwa, Rilian
Advertisement