DAS SEXIST.
Also, the irony of a privilege nobody wants...
Advertisement

by The Rich Port » Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:55 pm

by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

by Farnhamia » Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)Farnhamia wrote:Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.
But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...

by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:02 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)
But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...
No, we aren't granted that mercy. We recover and have to do it again and again and again ...

by The Rich Port » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:09 pm
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)Farnhamia wrote:Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.
But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...

by The Empire of Pretantia » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:32 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)
But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...
No, we aren't granted that mercy. We recover and have to do it again and again and again ...

by The Rich Port » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:42 pm

by Haktiva » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:43 pm
The Rich Port wrote:The United Colonies of Earth wrote:If it's too costly to hold, why would anyone wanna carry that hot steaming pile of shit?
Well, if it's forced on you "for your benefit", for one.
And when people start making the argument that including women in the Selective Service System is bad for men and... That's why they should be excluded, for another.
People have changed my mind about the Selective Service Act, though. I'm now semi-against it. Military should be strictly for volunteers... As long as the military respects the rights of the civilians they're supposed to protect.
If it means sacrificing our freedoms AND our security, this country isn't worth protecting and the military is ignorantly wasting their time.

by The Rich Port » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:49 pm
Haktiva wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
Well, if it's forced on you "for your benefit", for one.
And when people start making the argument that including women in the Selective Service System is bad for men and... That's why they should be excluded, for another.
People have changed my mind about the Selective Service Act, though. I'm now semi-against it. Military should be strictly for volunteers... As long as the military respects the rights of the civilians they're supposed to protect.If it means sacrificing our freedoms AND our security, this country isn't worth protecting and the military is ignorantly wasting their time.
I just like what General Smedley Butler said, that there should be a referendum by the people who would have to go and fight the war.

by Ayreonia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:24 am

by Ashmoria » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:36 am
Ayreonia wrote:I can find several examples of women's movements and feminist groups opposing female conscription, but can you provide an example of what you said?

by Galloism » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:47 am
The Norwegian Association for Women’s Rights (NKF) is not opposed to women voluntarily seeking a career in the military if they want to, and the way the system works today, women have the same opportunities as men to join the armed forces. Conscription is something else – it includes everybody and entails the use of force. NKF strongly warns against the exertion of pressure to get women into the military and particularly the introduction of female conscription.
It is difficult to understand why the Ministry of Defence tries to recruit more women in a situation where only a small minority of men actually performs military service. The arguments are put forward that women and men must be treated equally, that women will help maintain the legitimacy of conscription and that they will contribute to better defence.
....
To ensure gender equality it is important in many cases that women and men are treated equally. But they should not necessarily be treated equally in all situations. In some cases, the underprivileged gender must be favoured to be able obtain similar results. Actual differences between the lives of women and men must be taken into account. Women make an important contribution to society by becoming pregnant, giving birth and breast-feeding. Despite many years of active equality policy in Norway, women still bear the heaviest burden for children, sick and old people. Their efforts in this area are extensive and socially beneficial. But although women often are double working, they still earn less than men, own much less than men, have lower pension and are underrepresented in positions of power and influence. To impose a new burden such as conscription on women in this situation is unreasonable, and it can increase the economic and social gender gaps in society. Instead of equality the result will be greater inequality.

by Ayreonia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:03 am

by Ayreonia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:19 am

by Ayreonia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:26 am

by Ashmoria » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:28 am
Ayreonia wrote:Ashmoria wrote:
about what I thought it would be--few and far between. and utterly inconsequential.
The IAW is inconsequential now?
Also, this was a 15-minute DuckDuckGo search with the keyword "women and conscription". While there were very few examples, as you pointed out, there were zero of these fabled pro-women's conscription women.
I also ruled out all results that had men opposing female conscription, because, well, you know why, and also organizations that had other main agendas, such as religious ones.

by New Benian Republic » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:35 am

by Jamzmania » Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:32 am
HUElavia wrote:At the time that Mass Draft was made, Women were not seen as people, hence they did not make them sign up for the draft.
The Alexanderians wrote:"Fear no man or woman,
No matter what their size.
Call upon me,
And I will equalize."
-Engraved on the side of my M1911 .45

by The Holy Shifty Empire » Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:35 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Durzan, Equai, Fractalnavel, Galactic Powers, Grinning Dragon, Hidrandia, Juansonia, McNernia, Myrensis, Necroghastia, Nickel Empire, Ostroeuropa, Rusticus I Damianus, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Black Forrest, The Holy Rat, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Valyxias, Xind
Advertisement