NATION

PASSWORD

-

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:55 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:In the way that potentially saves them from bleeding out on a battlefield.

Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.


DAS SEXIST.

Also, the irony of a privilege nobody wants...

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)
Farnhamia wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:In the way that potentially saves them from bleeding out on a battlefield.

Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.

But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111676
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)
Farnhamia wrote:Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.

But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...

No, we aren't granted that mercy. We recover and have to do it again and again and again ...
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.


DAS SEXIST.

Also, the irony of a privilege nobody wants...

If it's too costly to hold, why would anyone wanna carry that hot steaming pile of shit?
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:02 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)

But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...

No, we aren't granted that mercy. We recover and have to do it again and again and again ...

Sounds quite a bit like hell. If it's that bad, one day it might be wise to get around to removing the biological imperative of menstruation.
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:09 pm

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)
Farnhamia wrote:Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.

But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...


Well... You don't necessarily die from getting dismembered by a bomb or shot.

PMDD, as opposed to regular PMS, has been known to cause severe psychological stress, to the point of causing anxiety attacks and major depressive episodes.

All reasons to exclude soldiers from fighting.
Last edited by The Rich Port on Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:32 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Men are expendable. Women can only have more than one baby at a time if you get lucky or something like that.
(I dunno how likely it is to have twins...)

But it's not like you die from recycling a uterine lining...necessarily...

No, we aren't granted that mercy. We recover and have to do it again and again and again ...

Oh, suck it up. You're a big girl, aren't you?
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:42 pm

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
DAS SEXIST.

Also, the irony of a privilege nobody wants...

If it's too costly to hold, why would anyone wanna carry that hot steaming pile of shit?


Well, if it's forced on you "for your benefit", for one.

And when people start making the argument that including women in the Selective Service System is bad for men and... That's why they should be excluded, for another.

People have changed my mind about the Selective Service Act, though. I'm now semi-against it. Military should be strictly for volunteers... As long as the military respects the rights of the civilians they're supposed to protect.

If it means sacrificing our freedoms AND our security, this country isn't worth protecting and the military is ignorantly wasting their time.

User avatar
Haktiva
Senator
 
Posts: 4762
Founded: Sep 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Haktiva » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:43 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:If it's too costly to hold, why would anyone wanna carry that hot steaming pile of shit?


Well, if it's forced on you "for your benefit", for one.

And when people start making the argument that including women in the Selective Service System is bad for men and... That's why they should be excluded, for another.

People have changed my mind about the Selective Service Act, though. I'm now semi-against it. Military should be strictly for volunteers... As long as the military respects the rights of the civilians they're supposed to protect.

If it means sacrificing our freedoms AND our security, this country isn't worth protecting and the military is ignorantly wasting their time.

I just like what General Smedley Butler said, that there should be a referendum by the people who would have to go and fight the war.
All around disagreeable person.

"Personal freedom is a double edged sword though. On the one end, it grants more power to the individual. However, the vast majority of individuals are fuckin idiots, and if certain restraints are not metered down by more responsible members of society, the society quickly degrades into a hedonistic and psychotic cluster fuck."

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:49 pm

Haktiva wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Well, if it's forced on you "for your benefit", for one.

And when people start making the argument that including women in the Selective Service System is bad for men and... That's why they should be excluded, for another.

People have changed my mind about the Selective Service Act, though. I'm now semi-against it. Military should be strictly for volunteers... As long as the military respects the rights of the civilians they're supposed to protect.If it means sacrificing our freedoms AND our security, this country isn't worth protecting and the military is ignorantly wasting their time.

I just like what General Smedley Butler said, that there should be a referendum by the people who would have to go and fight the war.


Smedley Butler... Now THERE'S a fucking exemplary soldier. I mean, holy shit.

Well, I rather disagree with that, as I lick his boots... Only problem with a volunteer army would be with an invasion or a lack of manpower or funds causing problems in national security, which is what allegedly happened with 9/11 (even though the evidence points to it being a security oversight, Osama bin Laden having been a former ally of the U.S... Even then, that seems to be more a lack of funds/manpower in the CIA, rather than the military).

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:24 am

The Rich Port wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:In the way that potentially saves them from bleeding out on a battlefield.


... Well, multiple movements have been started where women have campaigned and explicitly demanded for the REMOVAL of that privilege.

I can find several examples of women's movements and feminist groups opposing female conscription, but can you provide an example of what you said?
Farnhamia wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:In the way that potentially saves them from bleeding out on a battlefield.

Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.

Adorable. Tell that to the hundreds of millions of conscripted males who have died in war.
Last edited by Ayreonia on Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19953
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:31 am

Ayreonia wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Hell, we bleed out every 28 days. You guys couldn't handle it.

Adorable. Tell that to the tens of millions of conscripted males who have died in war.

I'm not actually sure your statement logically follows on from Farnhamia's

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:32 am

The United Colonies of Earth wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:No, we aren't granted that mercy. We recover and have to do it again and again and again ...

Sounds quite a bit like hell. If it's that bad, one day it might be wise to get around to removing the biological imperative of menstruation.


they have pills for that now.
whatever

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:36 am

Ayreonia wrote:I can find several examples of women's movements and feminist groups opposing female conscription, but can you provide an example of what you said?


oh cool. please do so.
whatever

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72258
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:47 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:I can find several examples of women's movements and feminist groups opposing female conscription, but can you provide an example of what you said?


oh cool. please do so.

Well, a 30 second google search revealed this.

http://womenalliance.org/no-to-female-conscription

Context: Norway switched from male-only conscription to conscription of both genders.

The Norwegian Association for Women’s Rights (NKF) is not opposed to women voluntarily seeking a career in the military if they want to, and the way the system works today, women have the same opportunities as men to join the armed forces. Conscription is something else – it includes everybody and entails the use of force. NKF strongly warns against the exertion of pressure to get women into the military and particularly the introduction of female conscription.

It is difficult to understand why the Ministry of Defence tries to recruit more women in a situation where only a small minority of men actually performs military service. The arguments are put forward that women and men must be treated equally, that women will help maintain the legitimacy of conscription and that they will contribute to better defence.

....

To ensure gender equality it is important in many cases that women and men are treated equally. But they should not necessarily be treated equally in all situations. In some cases, the underprivileged gender must be favoured to be able obtain similar results. Actual differences between the lives of women and men must be taken into account. Women make an important contribution to society by becoming pregnant, giving birth and breast-feeding. Despite many years of active equality policy in Norway, women still bear the heaviest burden for children, sick and old people. Their efforts in this area are extensive and socially beneficial. But although women often are double working, they still earn less than men, own much less than men, have lower pension and are underrepresented in positions of power and influence. To impose a new burden such as conscription on women in this situation is unreasonable, and it can increase the economic and social gender gaps in society. Instead of equality the result will be greater inequality.


And it goes on.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:03 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:I can find several examples of women's movements and feminist groups opposing female conscription, but can you provide an example of what you said?


oh cool. please do so.

http://womenalliance.org/no-to-female-conscription
http://www.refusingtokill.net/Israel/wo ... israel.htm
http://www.swarthmore.edu/Library/peace ... 8.wcoc.htm
http://www.swarthmore.edu/Library/peace ... istory.htm
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:18 am

whatever

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:19 am

Alvecia wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:
Adorable. Tell that to the tens of millions of conscripted males who have died in war.

I'm not actually sure your statement logically follows on from Farnhamia's

It's okay, I am.
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:26 am


The IAW is inconsequential now?

Also, this was a 15-minute DuckDuckGo search with the keyword "women and conscription". While there were very few examples, as you pointed out, there were zero of these fabled pro-women's conscription women.

I also ruled out all results that had men opposing female conscription, because, well, you know why, and also organizations that had other main agendas, such as religious ones.
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:28 am

Ayreonia wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
about what I thought it would be--few and far between. and utterly inconsequential.

The IAW is inconsequential now?

Also, this was a 15-minute DuckDuckGo search with the keyword "women and conscription". While there were very few examples, as you pointed out, there were zero of these fabled pro-women's conscription women.

I also ruled out all results that had men opposing female conscription, because, well, you know why, and also organizations that had other main agendas, such as religious ones.


no the result of its opposition was inconsequential. either they didn't fight very hard or they aren't very powerful.

I know nothing about them, of course, but it seemed rather silly to me to oppose female conscription when so few are ever drafted and they have a strong conscientious objector program.
whatever

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19953
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:34 am

Ayreonia wrote:
Alvecia wrote:I'm not actually sure your statement logically follows on from Farnhamia's

It's okay, I am.

You'd be wrong. It's absolutely false equivalence.

User avatar
New Benian Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1930
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Benian Republic » Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:35 am

Because gender equality you sexist!
~~~Support Sinn Féinn I guess~~~

~Like all true Irishmen I have no ancestors. I was birthed from Ireland's soil itself, fully formed, like a potato.~
Pro: United Ireland, IRA, Allan Ryan, Palestine, Malvinas, Ukraine, Hamas-Fatah cooperation, legalized Gay marriage, Tibetan Resistance, Basque Separatists, OPM.
Neutral: Bathroom segregation.

Anti: English Imperialism, Nazism, communism, Israel, Zionism, Margret thatcher, Martin McGuinness, good Friday agreement.
I am an Irish Atheist and Republican, Not a Dissident stop saying I am.
RIP Óglach Alan Ryan

~~Proud Gaelige Speaker~~

User avatar
HUElavia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1915
Founded: Jun 04, 2015
Corporate Bordello

Postby HUElavia » Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:30 am

At the time that Mass Draft was made, Women were not seen as people, hence they did not make them sign up for the draft.
Official Factbook
ENFJ/Neutral Good
About Me

User avatar
Jamzmania
Senator
 
Posts: 4863
Founded: Dec 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamzmania » Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:32 am

HUElavia wrote:At the time that Mass Draft was made, Women were not seen as people, hence they did not make them sign up for the draft.

That doesn't seem accurate.
The Alexanderians wrote:"Fear no man or woman,
No matter what their size.
Call upon me,
And I will equalize."

-Engraved on the side of my M1911 .45

User avatar
The Holy Shifty Empire
Attaché
 
Posts: 98
Founded: Jan 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Holy Shifty Empire » Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:35 am

Why aren't women protesting their lack of presence in the waste management industry? Fence erection? House-building?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Durzan, Equai, Fractalnavel, Galactic Powers, Grinning Dragon, Hidrandia, Juansonia, McNernia, Myrensis, Necroghastia, Nickel Empire, Ostroeuropa, Rusticus I Damianus, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Black Forrest, The Holy Rat, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Valyxias, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads