Adnan Nawaz And Bureacrats Elsewhere wrote:Who gives a flying fuck?
THINK OF THE CHILDREN
Advertisement
by Vassenor » Mon Dec 28, 2015 10:29 am
by USS Monitor » Mon Dec 28, 2015 2:42 pm
by Gauthier » Mon Dec 28, 2015 2:44 pm
by States of Glory » Mon Dec 28, 2015 3:35 pm
Hersuria wrote:How about no furniture?
You know, go all out Spartan.
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Dec 28, 2015 3:45 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Galloism » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:19 pm
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:47 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Gauthier » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:49 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:51 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by GreatestBanks » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:51 pm
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:51 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I want to stress that I refuse to get an itchy bum or backside from sitting in a Styrofoam sofa. Make me a sac and straw beanbag. I'd rather go organic!
Too heavy. Don't worry, it's just a matter of applying a coating to the styrofoam in order to maximize comfort and user friendliness.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:52 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by GreatestBanks » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:54 pm
by GreatestBanks » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:56 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:42 pm
GreatestBanks wrote:Banning atoms too, since they collide and make dangerous things happen when they do
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by USS Monitor » Mon Dec 28, 2015 10:44 pm
by Gauthier » Mon Dec 28, 2015 10:45 pm
by Wallenburg » Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:18 pm
by Marxist Nations » Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:22 pm
Galloism wrote:It's come to my attention that roughly 29 people in the United States per year are killed by falling furniture, even more than terrorists! Many of the victims are children and the elderly. These furniture builders have blood on their hands for all the people they've killed. We need to take immediate steps to correct all these deaths from furniture.
Here's a source for your perusal.
Over 40,000 hospital visits per year are due to falling furniture, causing a drain on our economy due to all these falling-furniture related injuries and deaths.
So, I propose the following changes:
Restrict all furniture pieces to 10 pounds at a maximum, once fully assembled in all parts under which is customarily held. For instance, on a bed, it would include the weight of the mattress, box spring, frame, and headboard (if all are used consistently).
Furniture, plus the things it is holding (other than beds), should be restricted to 15 pounds. There will be periodic mandatory in-home inspections to ensure furniture owners are not overloading their furniture where it can cause a danger to themselves and others. We can establish a federal agency with broad authority to enter homes and weigh furniture and its contents at any time of day or night.
This agency can also weigh individual furniture pieces as they come off the production line to ensure they consistently weigh less than 10 pounds.
We foster the development of carbon-nanotube furniture, and gradually move towards making that mandatory. Government subsidies can be used to help the poor buy furniture.
Given the special danger of televisions (they make up the vast majority of deaths), I suggest televisions over 13 inches be banned unless it can be made in such a way that it weighs less than 5 pounds.
What say ye, NSG?
by Immoren » Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:27 pm
Marxist Nations wrote:Galloism wrote:It's come to my attention that roughly 29 people in the United States per year are killed by falling furniture, even more than terrorists! Many of the victims are children and the elderly. These furniture builders have blood on their hands for all the people they've killed. We need to take immediate steps to correct all these deaths from furniture.
Here's a source for your perusal.
Over 40,000 hospital visits per year are due to falling furniture, causing a drain on our economy due to all these falling-furniture related injuries and deaths.
So, I propose the following changes:
Restrict all furniture pieces to 10 pounds at a maximum, once fully assembled in all parts under which is customarily held. For instance, on a bed, it would include the weight of the mattress, box spring, frame, and headboard (if all are used consistently).
Furniture, plus the things it is holding (other than beds), should be restricted to 15 pounds. There will be periodic mandatory in-home inspections to ensure furniture owners are not overloading their furniture where it can cause a danger to themselves and others. We can establish a federal agency with broad authority to enter homes and weigh furniture and its contents at any time of day or night.
This agency can also weigh individual furniture pieces as they come off the production line to ensure they consistently weigh less than 10 pounds.
We foster the development of carbon-nanotube furniture, and gradually move towards making that mandatory. Government subsidies can be used to help the poor buy furniture.
Given the special danger of televisions (they make up the vast majority of deaths), I suggest televisions over 13 inches be banned unless it can be made in such a way that it weighs less than 5 pounds.
What say ye, NSG?
Please tell me you are bored and are mearly lulzing on NSG.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Hardened Pyrokinetics » Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:44 pm
Pope Joan wrote:I had a client who stole the magnetic flashing light from the top of a police car.
It was parked in front of his house because they were asking his parents about his theft of 100 pounds of copper wire from the high school.
Galloism wrote:I bet it takes a lot of weed to get stoned to death.
New Manvir wrote:Canada: We have flying bears.
greed and death wrote:It is a sad day when we criticize the President for honoring a solider who gave everything for his nation.
by Fractalnavel » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:06 am
GreatestBanks wrote:... We should also seriously consider banning space, as it brings dangerous things into the atmosphere.
by The Two Jerseys » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:11 am
by Wallenburg » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:19 am
Fractalnavel wrote:GreatestBanks wrote:... We should also seriously consider banning space, as it brings dangerous things into the atmosphere.
Disagree; it's *time* that's the problem, not space. Force = m * a * t^2. Without time, no bad can happen. Ban time. This also eliminates concerns over the heat death of the universe.
What are you, some kind of space-ist ?
;-)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Burnt Calculators, Great Eddy, Haganham, Jerzylvania, Tiami, Zurkerx
Advertisement