NATION

PASSWORD

Left-Wing Discussion Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What kind of Leftist are you?

Centrist/Moderate/Third wayer (Centrists usually reside within Leftist parties, so I thought I'd include them).
279
13%
Social Liberal
259
12%
Social Democrat
338
16%
Green Progressive
188
9%
Democratic Socialist
433
20%
Marxist Communist
246
12%
Anarchist Communist
202
10%
Other (please state)
176
8%
 
Total votes : 2121

User avatar
Exelia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 907
Founded: Oct 30, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Exelia » Sun Dec 27, 2015 4:51 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Exelia wrote:Do you hate men?


Do you think that Feminists hate men?

No. Do you think non-feminists hate women?
The world is de jure American.

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Sun Dec 27, 2015 5:47 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Do you hate women?


Only feminists who wish to use the government to forward their agenda.


It's not like men make up the vast majority of elected officials, high-level government officials, policy advisors, etc etc. But I guess women are 'using the government to forward their agenda' when a Congress that is 80% male debates reproductive rights. Pressuring a mostly-male government to listen to women is ebul feminazism, definitely.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Vashtanaraada
Minister
 
Posts: 2682
Founded: Nov 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vashtanaraada » Sun Dec 27, 2015 5:50 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Exelia wrote:Do you hate men?


Do you think that Feminists hate men?


Radical feminists do, don't even edge your way outta that one Chess.
All other feminists pretty much don't hate men. Otherwise I wouldn't be a socialist feminist.
19 Year Old Male, British (Scouser), Bassist, plays Heavy Metal + Hard Rock
Apatheist, Ex-Smoker and Ex-Stoner, Bi-Curious, ENFP Personality Type
University Student and Member of The Labour Party (United Kingdom)
-9.13 Economic
-6.00 Social
FOR - Democratic Socialism/ Classical Marxism/ Trade-Unionism/ Pro-Choice/ Anti-Nationalism/ Revolution/ Direct Democracy/ Internationalism/ Soft Drugs/ L.G.B.T Rights/ Ecologism/ Gender Equality.

AGAINST - Fascism/ Capitalism/ Conservatism/ Militarism/ Racism/ Homophobia/ Oligarchy/ Monarchy/ Hierarchy/ Austerity/ Dictatorships/ Leninism/ Privatisation/ Stereotypes/ Nuclear Weaponry.

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:04 pm

Would seriously appreciate left-wing feedback on this, this, and this. Amazing I only got two replies on that (albeit slightly orthodox) Marxist interpretation of society and capitalism, especially in this thread.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:09 pm

Vashtanaraada wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Do you think that Feminists hate men?


Radical feminists do, don't even edge your way outta that one Chess.
All other feminists pretty much don't hate men. Otherwise I wouldn't be a socialist feminist.


Hey I remember taking a test awhile back about feminism and it was the first time I heard the term. What's it about? is it like the class struggle side of feminism?
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:11 pm

Fanosolia wrote:
Vashtanaraada wrote:
Radical feminists do, don't even edge your way outta that one Chess.
All other feminists pretty much don't hate men. Otherwise I wouldn't be a socialist feminist.


Hey I remember taking a test awhile back about feminism and it was the first time I heard the term. What's it about? is it like the class struggle side of feminism?

Gender struggle, sure. I've seen feminists take "How misogynist are you?" tests and boast about their high scores on Facebook.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Fanosolia
Senator
 
Posts: 3796
Founded: Apr 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Fanosolia » Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:14 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Fanosolia wrote:
Hey I remember taking a test awhile back about feminism and it was the first time I heard the term. What's it about? is it like the class struggle side of feminism?

Gender struggle, sure. I've seen feminists take "How misogynist are you?" tests and boast about their high scores on Facebook.


Oh I see. Not it wasn't that test, it was more like "what kind of feminists are you?" sort of thing. I think it helped me better understand the movement better as a result.
Last edited by Fanosolia on Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user is a Canadian who identifies as Social Market Liberal with shades of Civil Libertarianism.


User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:16 pm

The Liberated Territories wrote:
Neon Trotsky wrote:Yes how dare women get involved in the political process.

This goes for anyone that wishes to use the gun of the government.

What about the gun of the people?
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:28 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:This goes for anyone that wishes to use the gun of the government.

What about the gun of the people?

Tyranny of the majority is a problem too. There has to be a constitutional limit.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:36 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:What about the gun of the people?

Tyranny of the majority is a problem too. There has to be a constitutional limit.

I totally agree. Freedom should extend to its furthest point - until it infringes on that of another.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:44 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:This goes for anyone that wishes to use the gun of the government.

What about the gun of the people?


Government of the people, by the people, for the people.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:54 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:What about the gun of the people?

Government of the people, by the people, for the people.

Government of and by the people cannot exist as a State.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:55 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:Government of the people, by the people, for the people.

Government of and by the people cannot exist as a State.

Why?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Tafhan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 952
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tafhan » Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:57 pm

Why are Trotskyists not liked by other Leftists? I think I heard that somewhere while lurking /leftypol/ at some point
|We are few, but we are bitter|

A Theocracy done the right way ( almost ) all of the time.
We are not a Muslim nation
OOC
My nation does not necessarily represent my irl views…kinda.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Tafhan wrote:Why are Trotskyists not liked by other Leftists? I think I heard that somewhere while lurking /leftypol/ at some point

Because to Marxists, Trotsky was a opportunist Menshevik liberal revisionist traitor. And because he crushed insurrectionary Ukraine for anarchists.

He was just a pretty shitty guy, to everyone but Trots.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:21 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Government of and by the people cannot exist as a State.

Why?

Because a State is a unit separate from the people with power over them. It's a political class. They can claim to be for the people, but never are in practice.

My main issue with Marxism, actually.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:54 pm

Vashtanaraada wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
Do you think that Feminists hate men?


Radical feminists do, don't even edge your way outta that one Chess.
All other feminists pretty much don't hate men. Otherwise I wouldn't be a socialist feminist.

Chess does not hate men, from my experience, I agree with some of the policies as she said. I agree more with Marxist Feminist but I am sick of people calling me "self-hating" for agree with feminism.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:56 pm

Socialist Tera wrote:
Vashtanaraada wrote:
Radical feminists do, don't even edge your way outta that one Chess.
All other feminists pretty much don't hate men. Otherwise I wouldn't be a socialist feminist.

Chess does not hate men, from my experience, I agree with some of the policies as she said. I agree more with Marxist Feminist but I am sick of people calling me "self-hating" for agree with feminism.

Chess is a TERF. I wouldn't identify with her, as a feminist myself.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Socialist Tera
Senator
 
Posts: 4960
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Tera » Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:59 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Socialist Tera wrote:Chess does not hate men, from my experience, I agree with some of the policies as she said. I agree more with Marxist Feminist but I am sick of people calling me "self-hating" for agree with feminism.

Chess is a TERF. I wouldn't identify with her, as a feminist myself.

I didn't know she is a terf, bit disappointed to be honest. I have agreed with her on other stances but this stance upsets me because I am highly supportive of the trans movement.
Theistic Satanist, Anarchist, Survivalist, eco-socialist. ex-tankie.

User avatar
Tafhan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 952
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tafhan » Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:02 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Tafhan wrote:Why are Trotskyists not liked by other Leftists? I think I heard that somewhere while lurking /leftypol/ at some point

Because to Marxists, Trotsky was a opportunist Menshevik liberal revisionist traitor. And because he crushed insurrectionary Ukraine for anarchists.

He was just a pretty shitty guy, to everyone but Trots.

How was he a "liberal revisionist" though?
|We are few, but we are bitter|

A Theocracy done the right way ( almost ) all of the time.
We are not a Muslim nation
OOC
My nation does not necessarily represent my irl views…kinda.

User avatar
The Krogan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5515
Founded: Sep 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Krogan » Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:05 pm

Finally! I've been waiting for this thread all my life, you see, I've always preferred the left-wing to the right-wing, I'm not sure if it's a difference in texture or maybe the taste itself.... Oh... wait.... This isn't that type of thread is it.... I'll just show myself to the door.... *slinks away with tears in his eyes*
The perpetual lurker of NS, trudging through the desolate winter.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:08 pm

Tafhan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Because to Marxists, Trotsky was a opportunist Menshevik liberal revisionist traitor. And because he crushed insurrectionary Ukraine for anarchists.

He was just a pretty shitty guy, to everyone but Trots.

How was he a "liberal revisionist" though?

Liberal because he was a Menshevik, and decided to side with the Bolsheviks when he saw which way the tide was turning. And do you know what revisionism is? It's kind of centered around being pro-Trotsky.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Tafhan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 952
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Tafhan » Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:13 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Tafhan wrote:How was he a "liberal revisionist" though?

Liberal because he was a Menshevik, and decided to side with the Bolsheviks when he saw which way the tide was turning. And do you know what revisionism is? It's kind of centered around being pro-Trotsky.

Yes. I know what it is. I myself was a (bad) Maoist for a short, very blurry amount of time. And I understand how he was some sort of revisionist, of course.

But I fail to see how Trotsky was Liberal (in the sense of economic Liberalism, as I assume you mean). The Mensheviks were very Orthodox Marxists, initially.
Last edited by Tafhan on Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|We are few, but we are bitter|

A Theocracy done the right way ( almost ) all of the time.
We are not a Muslim nation
OOC
My nation does not necessarily represent my irl views…kinda.

User avatar
Singaporean Transhumans
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5748
Founded: Dec 31, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Singaporean Transhumans » Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:15 pm

Tafhan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Liberal because he was a Menshevik, and decided to side with the Bolsheviks when he saw which way the tide was turning. And do you know what revisionism is? It's kind of centered around being pro-Trotsky.

Yes. I know what it is. And I understand how he was some sort of revisionist, of course.

But I fail to see how Trotsky was Liberal (in the sense of economic Liberalism, as I assume you mean).

'Liberal', at least from what I've seen in China, is a term thrown around slapped on anyone with remotely deviating tendencies.
SYNCRETIC COMBINE - SINKRETIČKE KOMBINAT
Factbook - Trobojka
JEDNOM ZAUVEK - ARMIJA SINKOMSKA

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:15 pm

Tafhan wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Liberal because he was a Menshevik, and decided to side with the Bolsheviks when he saw which way the tide was turning. And do you know what revisionism is? It's kind of centered around being pro-Trotsky.

Yes. I know what it is. And I understand how he was some sort of revisionist, of course.

But I fail to see how Trotsky was Liberal (in the sense of economic Liberalism, as I assume you mean).

That's not what I mean. Liberalism kind of means something different and wider to Marxists and far-left people in general.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, American Legionaries, Dakran, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Port Caverton, Stellar Colonies

Advertisement

Remove ads