Mattopilos wrote:
He did, however, experience revolutionary Catalonia, so he knows what such a place is like.
And the only reason that fell was because of Fascist forces.
He was also conveniently absent when Catalonia was conquered.
Advertisement
by Zudril » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:38 pm
Mattopilos wrote:
He did, however, experience revolutionary Catalonia, so he knows what such a place is like.
And the only reason that fell was because of Fascist forces.
by Pandeeria » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:38 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Minzerland II » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:38 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by United Marxist Nations » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:38 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Mattopilos » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:39 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:Mattopilos wrote:
He did, however, experience revolutionary Catalonia, so he knows what such a place is like.
"It was the first time I had ever been in a town where the working class was in the saddle. Practically every building of any size had been seized by the workers and was draped with red flags or with the red and black flag of the Anarchists; every wall was scrawled with the hammer and sickle and with the initials of the revolutionary parties; almost every church had been gutted and its images burnt. Churches here and there were being systematically demolished by gangs of workmen. Every shop and café had an inscription saying that it had been collectivised; even the bootblacks had been collectivised and their boxes painted red and black. Waiters and shop-walkers looked you in the face and treated you as an equal."
And the only reason that fell was because of Fascist forces.
And Stalinist forces.
by FelrikTheDeleted » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:39 pm
by Mattopilos » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:39 pm
by Kubra » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:39 pm
aw everybody say a lot of things about a lot of authors
by Bojikami » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:39 pm
by United Marxist Nations » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:40 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by FelrikTheDeleted » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:40 pm
by Kubra » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:40 pm
is there a problem with getting out of Dodge when things go sideways
by Minzerland II » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:40 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Pandeeria » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:40 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Pandeeria wrote:
Stalin was the greater butt hurt traitor, not giving out those factories to the workers.
Again, I encourage you to actually study Stalin by reading memoirs of those who were close to him. The fact of the matter, is that most of the Stalin clique continued to be loyal to Stalin, and proclaim him a socialist, long after it became unacceptable to.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Mattopilos » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:40 pm
by Trotskylvania » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:40 pm
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by Kubra » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:41 pm
Dostoevsky sucks as a person and his anti-catholicism verged on ridiculous
by Zudril » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:42 pm
Trotskylvania wrote:Zudril wrote:What makes that not a state?
The Spanish Revolution was a situation of dual power, with very complicated, fuzzy and constantly shifting balance between the government of the Spanish Republic itself, and the CNT-FAI.
Calling the CNT's federal structure a state is stupid, because the Spanish Republic still existed, and the two groups had conflicting goals and methods. The CNT collaborated in the Republican government in the name of the anti-fascist struggle while simultaneously trying to implement it's mass line. This included dissolving institutions of state power within the areas they collectivized, and substituting participatory democratic administration. But their militias also were part of the chain of command of the Republican military, as were the International Brigades, and the militias of other parties and unions like the POUM.
by Mattopilos » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:42 pm
Trotskylvania wrote:Zudril wrote:What makes that not a state?
The Spanish Revolution was a situation of dual power, with very complicated, fuzzy and constantly shifting balance between the government of the Spanish Republic itself, and the CNT-FAI.
Calling the CNT's federal structure a state is stupid, because the Spanish Republic still existed, and the two groups had conflicting goals and methods. The CNT collaborated in the Republican government in the name of the anti-fascist struggle while simultaneously trying to implement it's mass line. This included dissolving institutions of state power within the areas they collectivized, and substituting participatory democratic administration. But their militias also were part of the chain of command of the Republican military, as were the International Brigades, and the militias of other parties and unions like the POUM.
by Bakery Hill » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:42 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Mattopilos wrote:
As I said, there wasn't a single union - there were several. They just collaborated on certain things, such as bringing all the militia together to form an actual army.
>UNIFIED
>SOCIALIST
>PARTY
>OF CATALONIA
WAS NEITHER UNIFIED, NOR SOCIALIST, NOR A PARTY, NOR WAS IT IN CATALONIA
THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING.
by Pandeeria » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:42 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Kubra » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:42 pm
man he didn't even technically run with the anarchos
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Ancientania, Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, Google [Bot], ImSaLiA, Maximum Imperium Rex, Merien, New Temecula, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Tiami, Valrifall, Verkhoyanska
Advertisement