Kedri wrote:I am a social conservative but I agree with Rockerfeller Republicans on just about everything except social issues.
Alas, another of my kind!
Advertisement

by Northern Davincia » Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:35 pm
Kedri wrote:I am a social conservative but I agree with Rockerfeller Republicans on just about everything except social issues.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Zottistan » Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:53 pm

by Atelia » Wed Dec 23, 2015 3:10 pm
The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:It is funny really, generally speaking I lean center-right with an emphasis on the center. However, the right generally wants absolutely nothing to do with me considering I'm homosexual. That and I think the government should legalize and tax all recreational drugs, but the homosexual part usually shuts me out before I can even get to that bit.

by Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Dec 23, 2015 3:48 pm
Zottistan wrote:I guess I could be said to have some neo-conservative leanings.
by Zottistan » Wed Dec 23, 2015 4:21 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Zottistan wrote:I guess I could be said to have some neo-conservative leanings.
I'm always skeptical of the term "leanings" in politics. It basically means "I am this, but I don't want to outright proclaim it." Well, that's generally the case, I've seen plenty of exceptions.
For instance, the common neo conservative consensus today is that we should put "boots on the ground" in Iraq and Syria. Would you agree with that?

by Shan Yue » Wed Dec 23, 2015 4:35 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
I'm always skeptical of the term "leanings" in politics. It basically means "I am this, but I don't want to outright proclaim it." Well, that's generally the case, I've seen plenty of exceptions.

by Geilinor » Wed Dec 23, 2015 4:39 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Zottistan wrote:I guess I could be said to have some neo-conservative leanings.
I'm always skeptical of the term "leanings" in politics. It basically means "I am this, but I don't want to outright proclaim it." Well, that's generally the case, I've seen plenty of exceptions.
For instance, the common neo conservative consensus today is that we should put "boots on the ground" in Iraq and Syria. Would you agree with that?

by Duvniask » Wed Dec 23, 2015 4:51 pm
Zottistan wrote:I guess I could be said to have some neo-conservative leanings.

by The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Wed Dec 23, 2015 5:54 pm

by Kauthar » Wed Dec 23, 2015 6:44 pm
The Hobbesian Metaphysician wrote:So I see theocrat in the poll, and so are there any serious theocrats in here, and why exactly?

by Morr » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:01 pm
Kauthar wrote:progress towards the destruction of western values and culture

by Morr » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:02 pm
The Hobbesian Metaphysician wrote:So I see theocrat in the poll, and so are there any serious theocrats in here, and why exactly?
by Alyakia » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:04 pm

by Northern Davincia » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:09 pm
Morr wrote:Kauthar wrote:progress towards the destruction of western values and culture
Considering libertarianism rejects civic virtue (in fact, rejection of civic virtue is literally the only thing that distinguishes libertarianism from extreme liberalism), a fundamental cornerstone of Western values and culture, I don't think it's your place to complain.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Alyakia » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:10 pm

by Northern Davincia » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:12 pm
Alyakia wrote:can't wait to destroy western values and the traditional family, ha ha ha! -me at the leftist conference last week
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

by Morr » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:13 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Morr wrote:Considering libertarianism rejects civic virtue (in fact, rejection of civic virtue is literally the only thing that distinguishes libertarianism from extreme liberalism), a fundamental cornerstone of Western values and culture, I don't think it's your place to complain.
Libertarianism does not reject civic virtue, it simply does not require it. Libertarianism, as it is known in the United States, puts its focus on personal responsibility and independence from big government. Those sound like Western Values™ to me.

by Morr » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:13 pm
Alyakia wrote:can't wait to destroy western values and the traditional family, ha ha ha! -me at the leftist conference last week

by Northern Davincia » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:20 pm
Morr wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Libertarianism does not reject civic virtue, it simply does not require it. Libertarianism, as it is known in the United States, puts its focus on personal responsibility and independence from big government. Those sound like Western Values™ to me.
Making civic virtue something like stamp collecting is effectively rejecting its role in society.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

by The Liberated Territories » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:22 pm

by Jumalariik » Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:24 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Armeattla, Eahland, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, Fahran, Fractalnavel, Free Stalliongrad, Hispida, Luziyca, Pizza Friday Forever91, The Jamesian Republic, The Rio Grande River Basin, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Urkennalaid, Valrifall, Yasuragi
Advertisement