I wouldn't care if it happened, I just wouldn't actively argue for it other than pointing out that there are some justifications for it.
Advertisement
by New Chalcedon » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:29 pm
Traxa wrote:New Chalcedon wrote:
Really? He's only been leading the polls for, what, a year? As Jeb!'s brand of tired old establishmentarianism and Carson's particular niche of batshit-crazy have risen and fallen, he's just moved higher and higher.
Perhaps he actually will become the nominee....
The same polls predicting trump gets the GOP nominee are the same polls that said Romey would give obama a run for his money in their election and the only state Romney got that was of any value was Texas...I really don't need to say anymore.
by Ravenflight » Fri Dec 11, 2015 5:26 am
by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 11, 2015 6:43 am
by Vassenor » Fri Dec 11, 2015 6:53 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Silly brits, Now this is the way to do it, and avoids all issues of infringement of speech and property rights
https://www.change.org/p/nasa-petition- ... m=copylink
by Alvecia » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:07 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Silly brits, Now this is the way to do it, and avoids all issues of infringement of speech and property rights
https://www.change.org/p/nasa-petition- ... m=copylink
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:12 am
Alvecia wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Silly brits, Now this is the way to do it, and avoids all issues of infringement of speech and property rights
https://www.change.org/p/nasa-petition- ... m=copylink
Since the petition makes no note of leaving him with provisions, I presume we've moved from banning him from a country to straight up murdering the fella?
Also ITT: people acting like not being in the UK means you can no longer speak.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Alba Scotia (Ancient) » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:13 am
by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:15 am
Alba Scotia wrote:well we could use someone like Trump up here in Canada.
by Parti Ouvrier » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:17 am
by Alvecia » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:27 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Alvecia wrote:Since the petition makes no note of leaving him with provisions, I presume we've moved from banning him from a country to straight up murdering the fella?
Also ITT: people acting like not being in the UK means you can no longer speak.
No, no, no, it's not murder.
It's just really really negligent spacefaring.
by Alvecia » Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:28 am
Parti Ouvrier wrote:I don't see how banning Trump makes any difference, which is why I didn't sign it. They should try arguing against his politics rather than symbolically banning his freedom of movement.
by Napkiraly » Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:31 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Alvecia wrote:Since the petition makes no note of leaving him with provisions, I presume we've moved from banning him from a country to straight up murdering the fella?
Also ITT: people acting like not being in the UK means you can no longer speak.
No, no, no, it's not murder.
It's just really really negligent spacefaring.
by Dooom35796821595 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:37 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Silly brits, Now this is the way to do it, and avoids all issues of infringement of speech and property rights
https://www.change.org/p/nasa-petition- ... m=copylink
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:49 am
Parti Ouvrier wrote:I don't see how banning Trump makes any difference, which is why I didn't sign it. They should try arguing against his politics rather than symbolically banning his freedom of movement.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Dooom35796821595 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:06 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Parti Ouvrier wrote:I don't see how banning Trump makes any difference, which is why I didn't sign it. They should try arguing against his politics rather than symbolically banning his freedom of movement.
His persona non grata status in the UK is strictly not "banning his freedom of movement".
I don't think there is any inherent right to go where one pleases, except within reason. Persona non grata obviously precludes "within reason".
For what its worth, British politicians have indeed challenged it and said "we'd rather point out he's a twat".
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:11 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Ravenflight » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:14 am
This is the best petition of the year 
by Hurdegaryp » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:46 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:What did Greed & Death ever do to you?
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Atomic Utopia » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:48 am
by Vassenor » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:52 am
Atomic Utopia wrote:Why do they oppose him? Yes, he may be wrong occasionally but overall he appears to be our best bet at making America great again.
Users browsing this forum: -Astoria-, Alvecia, Amenson, American Legionaries, Eahland, Grand matrix of Dues ex machina, Shrillland, Southeast Iraq, Stellar Colonies, Thermodolia
