Advertisement
by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:28 pm
Minoa wrote:459,081 signatures so far.
The suggestion by Trump of forcing Muslim Americans to register in a database and wear a special form of identification is what crossed the line in my opinion.
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:30 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Kauthar wrote:Because any of the democrats and libertarians are any smarter
To be fair to all parties involved, at least none of the other candidates think our country is in the shitter just because this is not the 1920s.
I have qualms with all of them, but one thing I have to give to them is that they're not spelling doom and gloom for current times and that we should wind back the clock.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:33 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Minoa wrote:459,081 signatures so far.
The suggestion by Trump of forcing Muslim Americans to register in a database and wear a special form of identification is what crossed the line in my opinion.
Wait, that crossed the line?!
You guys have a really high tolerance for being British of us American colonials.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Olivaero » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:02 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Minoa wrote:459,081 signatures so far.
The suggestion by Trump of forcing Muslim Americans to register in a database and wear a special form of identification is what crossed the line in my opinion.
Wait, that crossed the line?!
You guys have a really high tolerance for being British of us American colonials.
by Trollgaard » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:09 pm
by Geilinor » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:12 pm
Trollgaard wrote:Haha, ridiculous.
If he wins what are you Brits gonna do? Ban the president of the US from entering your nation? Lmao.
by Southern Patriots » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:12 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Some people are just lying wankers. They should be treated as such.
I agree. So who decides that? Me the right-center neoconservative monetarist? You? Hitler? Etc.?
I mean I agree the guy is an asshole who says stupid things. So your solution is to not let him come to the UK? Are you fucking kidding me?
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:13 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Geilinor » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:14 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Some people are just lying wankers. They should be treated as such.
I agree. So who decides that? Me the right-center neoconservative monetarist? You? Hitler? Etc.?
I mean I agree the guy is an asshole who says stupid things. So your solution is to not let him come to the UK? Are you fucking kidding me?
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:14 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Given how Great Britain would probably have executed any of the first presidents of the USA if they ever had made the mistake of going to dear old Blighty, I don't see why it should be a problem to simply keep a highly hypothetical president Trump out of the country if you don't want him around.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Trollgaard » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:19 pm
by Infected Mushroom » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:27 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:32 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:I'm not sure why there is so much vitriol against Trump.
Sure he may have said some racist things, but there's usually at least some statistical basis for at least some of what he says (even if he does tend to speak in hyperboles).
Furthermore, why should the UK discriminate against him personally for his beliefs? Kind of a juvenile proposal to be honest; if anything they should be more worried about screening out potential terrorists in their immigration policies, given the recent attacks on Paris. You would think there are more important priorities here.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by SinusInfectionia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:37 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:I'm not sure why there is so much vitriol against Trump.
Sure he may have said some racist things, but there's usually at least some statistical basis for at least some of what he says (even if he does tend to speak in hyperboles).
Furthermore, why should the UK discriminate against him personally for his beliefs? Kind of a juvenile proposal to be honest; if anything they should be more worried about screening out potential terrorists in their immigration policies, given the recent attacks on Paris. You would think there are more important priorities here.
by Thanatttynia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:41 pm
SinusInfectionia wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:I'm not sure why there is so much vitriol against Trump.
Sure he may have said some racist things, but there's usually at least some statistical basis for at least some of what he says (even if he does tend to speak in hyperboles).
Furthermore, why should the UK discriminate against him personally for his beliefs? Kind of a juvenile proposal to be honest; if anything they should be more worried about screening out potential terrorists in their immigration policies, given the recent attacks on Paris. You would think there are more important priorities here.
I agree with your post but I don't remember Trump saying anything racist. He tends to exaggerate yeah but racist? i don't know.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:42 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:I'm not sure why there is so much vitriol against Trump.
Sure he may have said some racist things, but there's usually at least some statistical basis for at least some of what he says (even if he does tend to speak in hyperboles).
Furthermore, why should the UK discriminate against him personally for his beliefs? Kind of a juvenile proposal to be honest; if anything they should be more worried about screening out potential terrorists in their immigration policies, given the recent attacks on Paris. You would think there are more important priorities here.
by Infected Mushroom » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:44 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:I'm not sure why there is so much vitriol against Trump.
Sure he may have said some racist things, but there's usually at least some statistical basis for at least some of what he says (even if he does tend to speak in hyperboles).
Furthermore, why should the UK discriminate against him personally for his beliefs? Kind of a juvenile proposal to be honest; if anything they should be more worried about screening out potential terrorists in their immigration policies, given the recent attacks on Paris. You would think there are more important priorities here.
Well, if he was just racist, sure; I mean, we've had presidents saying stupid racist shit before.
His proposals however take it to a whole new level when even his own party is like "dude, what the fuck?"
by Thanatttynia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:46 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Well, if he was just racist, sure; I mean, we've had presidents saying stupid racist shit before.
His proposals however take it to a whole new level when even his own party is like "dude, what the fuck?"
I'm honestly not completely opposed to all of his ideas, some of them sound like they could be interesting to try politically
by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:47 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Well, if he was just racist, sure; I mean, we've had presidents saying stupid racist shit before.
His proposals however take it to a whole new level when even his own party is like "dude, what the fuck?"
I'm honestly not completely opposed to all of his ideas, some of them sound like they could be interesting to try politically
by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:50 pm
by SinusInfectionia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:51 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:52 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Ugatoo » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:53 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:53 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Thanatttynia wrote:???????????????????????????????????????
What ideas are these? Building a wall across the Mexican border? Closing off the internet?
I am sure people have thought about how ridiculous it actually sounds to make a wall even greater than the Great Wall of China.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Ifreann, Ithania
