One of capitalism's central tenets is competitiveness in the marketplace. Oligopolies and Monopolies happen when this isn't enforced by the powers that be.
Advertisement

by Eastern Equestria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:30 am

by Luminesa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:31 am
Thanatttynia wrote:Eastern Equestria wrote:Trump just let out a kind of interesting response to being rebuked by Scottish politicians and educational institutions:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-nor ... d-35060868
"I have done so much for Scotland, including building Trump International Golf Links, Scotland, which has received the highest accolades, and is what many believe to be one of the greatest golf courses anywhere in the world.
"Additionally, I have made a significant investment in the redevelopment of the iconic Turnberry Resort, which will have massive ballrooms, complete room refurbishments, a new golf course and a total rebuilding of the world famous Ailsa course to the highest standards and specifications of the Royal and Ancient.
"If they - Nicola Sturgeon and RGU - were going to do this, they should have informed me prior to my major investment in this £200m development, which will totally revitalise that vast region of Scotland.
"The UK politicians should be thanking me instead of pandering to political correctness."
He's still an ass, of course. But I do find it funny that the UK would consider banning Trump from their country whilst continuing to enjoy his golf resorts he invested millions into and still owns.
Those golf resorts have been nothing but shit for the local areas they were built in and the local people he stole off. Not many people get to enjoy golf resorts, anyway - perhaps the very rich. I find it difficult to express in words how irritatingly wrong he is on so many topics and so many points, largely because of his extreme arrogance and self-righteousness.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:31 am
Thanatttynia wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
I think he will be elected to the Republican Candidacy. Those who decide to back him will remain backing him I suspect. I suspect he could narrowly beat Clinton, but Sanders would be a landslide for Sanders.
Nothing to mix up really. The failure of the conservative movement to represent an adequate opposition to the left wing agenda is what unites anti-SJW conservatives and anti-corporatist ones, etc.
You have to remember that the right wing things corporatism is a result of left wing politics.
I suppose it's failures all round then?
We'll agree to disagree on the election possibility since there's only one way to find out but I will say that I think you (and many others) may be overestimating the degree to which the electorate is tired of the establishment. Of course they are and I expect to see a lot more unrest in the next few years, particularly in young people (and perhaps the lower classes if there were any suitable movement for them to follow) but in the end I think we'll have a situation where nothing has truly changed - voters will get to the booth and think 'better the devil you know'. Perhaps I'm just being pessimistic, however.Soldati senza confini wrote:
Hell, most people don't even know what the fuck a SJW is.
As someone who is pretty old-fashioned I don't even see the problems both SJWs and anti-SJWs online as a big deal. I just say "fuck it, you might have a point, but things were worse in the past so what do you want? You want an utopia? Cause you're not gonna have an utopia".
I'd agree, but I'd just say that a lot of the anti-'SJW' hysteria is unwarranted and defensive. They're young and loud and feel (rightly in my opinion) that they live in an oppressive state, and they're trying to change it with their limited means. I don't think it's possible to live in a non-oppressive state (I don't even think we'd want to) because oppression is just prejudice hitting the big-time; human nature transposed on to national politics.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Ugatoo » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:31 am

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:37 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:38 am
Luminesa wrote:Thanatttynia wrote:
Those golf resorts have been nothing but shit for the local areas they were built in and the local people he stole off. Not many people get to enjoy golf resorts, anyway - perhaps the very rich. I find it difficult to express in words how irritatingly wrong he is on so many topics and so many points, largely because of his extreme arrogance and self-righteousness.
The walking embodiment of Narcissitic Personality Disorder. I think any psychologist who had to deal with him would most likely need a psychologist themselves, after dealing with him.
Heck, Dr. Carson's gonna need one after all the bashing Trump's been giving him over the last...how long, now? And yet people still think Trump is what this country needs.
The lack of logic is astonishing.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Thanatttynia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:39 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Thanatttynia wrote:
I suppose it's failures all round then?
We'll agree to disagree on the election possibility since there's only one way to find out but I will say that I think you (and many others) may be overestimating the degree to which the electorate is tired of the establishment. Of course they are and I expect to see a lot more unrest in the next few years, particularly in young people (and perhaps the lower classes if there were any suitable movement for them to follow) but in the end I think we'll have a situation where nothing has truly changed - voters will get to the booth and think 'better the devil you know'. Perhaps I'm just being pessimistic, however.
I'd agree, but I'd just say that a lot of the anti-'SJW' hysteria is unwarranted and defensive. They're young and loud and feel (rightly in my opinion) that they live in an oppressive state, and they're trying to change it with their limited means. I don't think it's possible to live in a non-oppressive state (I don't even think we'd want to) because oppression is just prejudice hitting the big-time; human nature transposed on to national politics.
Indeed and you know what? Good for them that they want to change the world. My qualm with "SJWs" or, as I like to call them, the generation after me is that they believe everything should happen within their lifetime. That they have a right to have the things they demand right now. I have nothing against them wanting to make a better world, I have everything against them thinking they can achieve it in their lifetime and enjoy the rewards of their ideology.
Like I said, I'm old-fashioned, and I might be a millenial but I understand my role in the world with my ideals is not to change the world. My ideals and values are simply being left behind for what the teeny-boppers right now think are better values, and I have nothing against that, as that is what it was supposed to happen anyways, for them to learn from the fuck ups of prior generations, so I am perfectly fine in accepting the fact that people like me are phasing out faster than we probably should because we are barely one step ahead of the Gen Xers.

by Ugatoo » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:44 am

by Eastern Equestria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:46 am
Alvecia wrote:Nobody from the UK takes this petition seriously. If they are then they seriously misunderstand the petition process.
Thanatttynia wrote:Those golf resorts have been nothing but shit for the local areas they were built in and the local people he stole off. Not many people get to enjoy golf resorts, anyway - perhaps the very rich. I find it difficult to express in words how irritatingly wrong he is on so many topics and so many points, largely because of his extreme arrogance and self-righteousness.
Imperializt Russia wrote:[Well what are they going to do?

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:48 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:50 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Luminesa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:51 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Luminesa wrote:
The walking embodiment of Narcissitic Personality Disorder. I think any psychologist who had to deal with him would most likely need a psychologist themselves, after dealing with him.
Heck, Dr. Carson's gonna need one after all the bashing Trump's been giving him over the last...how long, now? And yet people still think Trump is what this country needs.
The lack of logic is astonishing.
Like I was telling a friend the other day:
It's because he is an asshole, and he is unapologetic, that people flock to him. He's selling his followers a package hard to resist: A strong leader which is going to make America strong again in the world, bring back our paternalistic place in the world as it was our rightful place in the pre-Cold War era. In a country where we still venerate the 1800s and early 1900s as the apex of our country and we think everything is going downhill and we have become "soft", it makes sense.

by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:55 am
Luminesa wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:Like I was telling a friend the other day:
It's because he is an asshole, and he is unapologetic, that people flock to him. He's selling his followers a package hard to resist: A strong leader which is going to make America strong again in the world, bring back our paternalistic place in the world as it was our rightful place in the pre-Cold War era. In a country where we still venerate the 1800s and early 1900s as the apex of our country and we think everything is going downhill and we have become "soft", it makes sense.
Strong, loud, unapologetic, wants to make America great again?
And nobody nominated ME?!
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Kauthar » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:58 am


by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:02 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:02 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Luminesa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:02 pm


by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:06 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Eastern Equestria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:06 pm
Thanatttynia wrote:Eastern Equestria wrote:
One of capitalism's central tenets is competitiveness in the marketplace. Oligopolies and Monopolies happen when this isn't enforced by the powers that be.
That's the idea in theory but it's not really worked out so well, especially considering that capitalism in and of itself rewards those who can manage to establish for themselves oligopolies and monopolies. I find it confusing that communism is bashed because of its failed implementations in the former Soviet bloc and yet capitalism is all but praised and any alternative is laughed at or feared when capitalism has failed to for all intents and purposes the same extent as communism.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Really don't see any hypocrisy with a person having placed a business in a country and then gotten himself persona non grata status from that country unless the state decided to confiscate all profits of such a business or outright absorbed the business.
Selling it onto someone else I'd see as slightly less hypocritical but not by much, since that would also involve taking ownership of it.

by Luminesa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:09 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Luminesa wrote:What if I become the coolest Independent to ever run? Like, so cool Ron Paul goes all, "OH MY GOSH LUMINESA YOU ARE SO COOL!!!"
And I'm like, "I know right?"
Sounds about right, I'm afraid. Years ago, hordes of libertarian Redditors were dead certain that Ron Paul was going to become the president. The ultimate president, even! Didn't exactly work out the way they hoped, even though they were so extremely certain of victory.

by Hurdegaryp » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:13 pm
Luminesa wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Sounds about right, I'm afraid. Years ago, hordes of libertarian Redditors were dead certain that Ron Paul was going to become the president. The ultimate president, even! Didn't exactly work out the way they hoped, even though they were so extremely certain of victory.
And so Obama won. Because Ron Paul wouldn't drop-out of the race, and the vote was split.
Imma be completely honest, Mitt Romney was not the ideal candidate I'd want, but I'm just saying...Ron Paul did something stupid by splitting the vote.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:14 pm
Luminesa wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Sounds about right, I'm afraid. Years ago, hordes of libertarian Redditors were dead certain that Ron Paul was going to become the president. The ultimate president, even! Didn't exactly work out the way they hoped, even though they were so extremely certain of victory.
And so Obama won. Because Ron Paul wouldn't drop-out of the race, and the vote was split.
Imma be completely honest, Mitt Romney was not the ideal candidate I'd want, but I'm just saying...Ron Paul did something stupid by splitting the vote.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Eastern Equestria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:16 pm
Luminesa wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Sounds about right, I'm afraid. Years ago, hordes of libertarian Redditors were dead certain that Ron Paul was going to become the president. The ultimate president, even! Didn't exactly work out the way they hoped, even though they were so extremely certain of victory.
And so Obama won. Because Ron Paul wouldn't drop-out of the race, and the vote was split.
Imma be completely honest, Mitt Romney was not the ideal candidate I'd want, but I'm just saying...Ron Paul did something stupid by splitting the vote.

by Luminesa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:20 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Luminesa wrote:And so Obama won. Because Ron Paul wouldn't drop-out of the race, and the vote was split.
Imma be completely honest, Mitt Romney was not the ideal candidate I'd want, but I'm just saying...Ron Paul did something stupid by splitting the vote.
Serves the USA right for being a two party state.
by Minoa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:26 pm
Advertisement
Advertisement