NATION

PASSWORD

White House: Trump's Statement "Disqualifies" Him

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Daburuetchi
Minister
 
Posts: 2656
Founded: Sep 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Daburuetchi » Thu Dec 10, 2015 4:36 am

The Two Jerseys wrote:You mean like how Obama was "disqualified" from being President by being a foreign-born Muslim, because Trump said so?

I honestly expect better from the White House than to descend to that level of mudslinging.


Your standards are far too high for this day and age

User avatar
Eastern Equestria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7719
Founded: Feb 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Eastern Equestria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:02 am

New confederate ramenia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:He can just take the oath and break it. At this point, that's basically allowed by common law and numerous precedent.
:)

This. There's no real accountability for the federal government anymore, so Presidents can do what they want.


They can't do anything substantial without the House and Senate's approval, so not really.

The Two Jerseys wrote:You mean like how Obama was "disqualified" from being President by being a foreign-born Muslim, because Trump said so?

I honestly expect better from the White House than to descend to that level of mudslinging


At least the White House had valid grounds for that kind of disparaging remark.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10405
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:12 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:To be fair, the donald did say until things can be sorted out as in the quote below.
“total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on.” -Donald Trump.

In 1980 the feckless president jimmy carter actually grew a spine and banned iranians from entering into the U.S. by invoking the Nationality Act of 1952.
Then during a speech to the nation.

With the USSC signing off on his deportation of any iranian whose visas were found to be in violation.


I guess in a sort of way one could say that this sort of thing has already been done

The situations aren't at all comparable.

The state of Iran had just taken the US embassy in Tehran hostage. In response, as diplomatic pressure, all Iranian students were expelled and entrants denied. Because they were pressuring the Iranian state, which they had just broken off relations with.

This is like saying "we're going to prohibit blacks from entering the country until they stop doing inner city crimes" or "we're going to kick out all Asians until China stops trying to overtake our economy".
Even those aren't really comparable because those are talking about broad ethnicities while Trump is talking about a fucking religion that a quarter of the world holds.


I had inadvertently left out part of my original post. Here is the addendum I posted to Farn.

Grinning Dragon wrote:

He also barred any iranians from entering the US. by invoking: 8 US code /# 1182- Inadmissible Aliens, it allows the US government to stop anyone or any group they deem as a danger to the US from entering
Secretary of Treasury [State] and the Attorney General will invalidate all visas issued to Iranian citizens for future entry into the United States, effective today. We will not reissue visas, nor will we issue new visas, except for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country requires. This directive will be interpreted very strictly.


I'm just getting at what trump had said isn't all that shocking, IMO.
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:26 am

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic ... n-proposal

2/3rds of republican voters back the ban on muslim immigration.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:54 am

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:The situations aren't at all comparable.

The state of Iran had just taken the US embassy in Tehran hostage. In response, as diplomatic pressure, all Iranian students were expelled and entrants denied. Because they were pressuring the Iranian state, which they had just broken off relations with.

This is like saying "we're going to prohibit blacks from entering the country until they stop doing inner city crimes" or "we're going to kick out all Asians until China stops trying to overtake our economy".
Even those aren't really comparable because those are talking about broad ethnicities while Trump is talking about a fucking religion that a quarter of the world holds.


I had inadvertently left out part of my original post. Here is the addendum I posted to Farn.

Grinning Dragon wrote:

He also barred any iranians from entering the US. by invoking: 8 US code /# 1182- Inadmissible Aliens, it allows the US government to stop anyone or any group they deem as a danger to the US from entering


I'm just getting at what trump had said isn't all that shocking, IMO.

I read it, considered it, and believed it to still not truly apply.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Valystria
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Jul 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Valystria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:20 am

The Two Jerseys wrote:You mean like how Obama was "disqualified" from being President by being a foreign-born Muslim, because Trump said so?

I honestly expect better from the White House than to descend to that level of mudslinging.


They don't consider it to be mudslinging when they themselves are partaking in it. It's only when the opponent does it it's considered mudslinging.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76350
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:04 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-12-09/bloomberg-politics-poll-trump-muslim-ban-proposal

2/3rds of republican voters back the ban on muslim immigration.

Oh dear. Nazi America here we come.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:08 am

Daburuetchi wrote:
The Two Jerseys wrote:You mean like how Obama was "disqualified" from being President by being a foreign-born Muslim, because Trump said so?

I honestly expect better from the White House than to descend to that level of mudslinging.


Your standards are far too high for this day and age

Or is it that your standards are far too low?
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Valystria
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Jul 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Valystria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:12 am

Thermodolia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-12-09/bloomberg-politics-poll-trump-muslim-ban-proposal

2/3rds of republican voters back the ban on muslim immigration.

Oh dear. Nazi America here we come.


?

The Nazis were pro-Muslim.

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:18 am

Valystria wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Oh dear. Nazi America here we come.


?

The Nazis were pro-Muslim.

The Nazis were only pro-muslim because it gave them allies, had they won the Japanese and Muslims would have been the next targets.
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Valystria
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Jul 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Valystria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:22 am

Ugatoo wrote:
Valystria wrote:
?

The Nazis were pro-Muslim.

The Nazis were only pro-muslim because it gave them allies, had they won the Japanese and Muslims would have been the next targets.


The evidence is against your attempt at historical revisionism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relations_between_Nazi_Germany_and_the_Arab_world#Hitler.27s_views_on_Islam_and_the_Arab_world

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:23 am

Ugatoo wrote:
Valystria wrote:
?

The Nazis were pro-Muslim.

The Nazis were only pro-muslim because it gave them allies, had they won the Japanese and Muslims would have been the next targets.


Not true. The Nazis weren't world conquest types. They wanted to conquer Europe. They were big on racial ancestry shit.

The ideal Nazi World was a united europe under Nazism, a united East Asia under Imperial Cult, a united Arab world under Islam, etc.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:24 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ugatoo wrote:The Nazis were only pro-muslim because it gave them allies, had they won the Japanese and Muslims would have been the next targets.


Not true. The Nazis weren't world conquest types. They wanted to conquer Europe. They were big on racial ancestry shit.

The ideal Nazi World was a united europe under Nazism, a united East Asia under Imperial Cult, a united Arab world under Islam, etc.

Fake racial ancestry shit, a lot of it also wrong for being about racial ancestry in the first place, but basically yeah.

Remember that "Iran" became Iran from "Persia" because that's the Arab spelling of "Aryan" or some such.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Nusantaran Sundaland
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Jun 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Nusantaran Sundaland » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:25 am

He won't be president for sure
He lost a lot of votes bcs of his anti-muslim and immigration statements
For the Glory of Nusantaran Sundaland
This signature is brought to yu by the glorius leader of Nusantaran Sundaland, please don't disrespect or get killed

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:26 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Not true. The Nazis weren't world conquest types. They wanted to conquer Europe. They were big on racial ancestry shit.

The ideal Nazi World was a united europe under Nazism, a united East Asia under Imperial Cult, a united Arab world under Islam, etc.

Fake racial ancestry shit, a lot of it also wrong for being about racial ancestry in the first place, but basically yeah.

Remember that "Iran" became Iran from "Persia" because that's the Arab spelling of "Aryan" or some such.


Yeh, fake racist ancestry shit. Fair point.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:26 am

Nusantaran Sundaland wrote:He won't be president for sure
He lost a lot of votes bcs of his anti-muslim and immigration statements

Because the right wing is famous for being pro-Muslim and pro-immigration right?
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:27 am

Nusantaran Sundaland wrote:He won't be president for sure
He lost a lot of votes bcs of his anti-muslim and immigration statements


If Sanders is the nominee I expect Trump will lose.
If it's Clinton, he may well win.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:28 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Nusantaran Sundaland wrote:He won't be president for sure
He lost a lot of votes bcs of his anti-muslim and immigration statements


If Sanders is the nominee I expect Trump will lose.
If it's Clinton, he may well win.

Clinton will beat Trump because America is a Corporatist oligarchy and Clinton is backed by corporations and Trump is backed by individuals.
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Valystria
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Jul 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Valystria » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:29 am

Ugatoo wrote:
Nusantaran Sundaland wrote:He won't be president for sure
He lost a lot of votes bcs of his anti-muslim and immigration statements

Because the right wing is famous for being pro-Muslim and pro-immigration right?

They were pro-Muslim until only recently.

http://mic.com/articles/130019/muslims-helped-elect-george-w-bush-now-the-gop-front-runner-wants-to-ban-them#.xfucS5vew

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/republicans-muslim-vote-george-w-bush-donald-trump/419481/

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:29 am

Ugatoo wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
If Sanders is the nominee I expect Trump will lose.
If it's Clinton, he may well win.

Clinton will beat Trump because America is a Corporatist oligarchy and Clinton is backed by corporations and Trump is backed by individuals.


But people are aware of that, and the more the media attacks Trump, the stronger he becomes.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:31 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ugatoo wrote:Clinton will beat Trump because America is a Corporatist oligarchy and Clinton is backed by corporations and Trump is backed by individuals.


But people are aware of that, and the more the media attacks Trump, the stronger he becomes.

Do you honestly think the average person either knows or understands the ramifications of voting for a corporation backed candidate vs an individual backed candidate?
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:32 am



Not surprising that a section of the population that is known for having ultraconservative views would back bush.

Nor is it surprising that after muslim countries get attacked and such that they abandon support and go democrat. Tribalism is common among religious fundamentalists.

You know how christians on the right whine about christian persecution?
Muslims do the exact same thing, difference is the left establishment listens to them.
Why?

Brown.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:32 am


Let's not forgot that Dubya made a statement mere days after 9/11 urging America not to use what became the War on Terror as a race war or a clash of cultures, actually quoting the Quran and calling Islam the religion of peace.

How far the world has fallen when George W motherfucking Bush is now essentially the most enlightened of right-wing thinkers.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76350
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:33 am

Valystria wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Oh dear. Nazi America here we come.


?

The Nazis were pro-Muslim.

Yes I'm well aware of what the nazis are and aren't. The reason I used the nazis is because they got rid of an entire Ethnic religious group (the Jews) and Trump wants to do the same to the Muslims, so the comparison fits. Also Nazis in America are ANTI-Jewish and Muslim.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Slaveavania
Attaché
 
Posts: 66
Founded: Dec 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Slaveavania » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:33 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:

Let's not forgot that Dubya made a statement mere days after 9/11 urging America not to use what became the War on Terror as a race war or a clash of cultures, actually quoting the Quran and calling Islam the religion of peace.

How far the world has fallen when George W motherfucking Bush is now essentially the most enlightened of right-wing thinkers.

Enlightened isn't the right word. He just wasn't strong in his convictions. So really, Bush was a failure.
Copy and paste this into your signature if you hate looking at what other people put in theirs.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Grinning Dragon, Khardsland, Kizekia, Port Caverton, The Two Jerseys, Vernes, Viteri Sangnam, Wingdings, Yoshilandian Tasmania

Advertisement

Remove ads