Advertisement

by Titel der Stadt » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:09 pm
Barboneia wrote:I wasn't sure if this belonged in the Republican Primaries Megathread or if someone's already posted about it, but this seems to be an interesting development.
So according to the White House, Trump's recent statement about banning all Muslims from entering the country disqualifies him from running for the presidency, citing it as violating the oath every president must make. However, the White House hasn't officially banned him from running, as his campaign still seems to be in full speed. But say he were to get enough votes and won, then what? I'm not exactly sure, but the White House's statement seems like it'd be a pretty heavy blow to Trump support. What do you think, NSG? Is this the end to Trump's run?

by Ugatoo » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:12 pm
Titel der Stadt wrote:Barboneia wrote:I wasn't sure if this belonged in the Republican Primaries Megathread or if someone's already posted about it, but this seems to be an interesting development.
So according to the White House, Trump's recent statement about banning all Muslims from entering the country disqualifies him from running for the presidency, citing it as violating the oath every president must make. However, the White House hasn't officially banned him from running, as his campaign still seems to be in full speed. But say he were to get enough votes and won, then what? I'm not exactly sure, but the White House's statement seems like it'd be a pretty heavy blow to Trump support. What do you think, NSG? Is this the end to Trump's run?
It should be. It is against the oath, because the oath says, "and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Trumps statements go against the first amendment.

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:12 pm
Titel der Stadt wrote:Barboneia wrote:I wasn't sure if this belonged in the Republican Primaries Megathread or if someone's already posted about it, but this seems to be an interesting development.
So according to the White House, Trump's recent statement about banning all Muslims from entering the country disqualifies him from running for the presidency, citing it as violating the oath every president must make. However, the White House hasn't officially banned him from running, as his campaign still seems to be in full speed. But say he were to get enough votes and won, then what? I'm not exactly sure, but the White House's statement seems like it'd be a pretty heavy blow to Trump support. What do you think, NSG? Is this the end to Trump's run?
It should be. It is against the oath, because the oath says, "and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Trumps statements go against the first amendment.

by Ugatoo » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:14 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Titel der Stadt wrote:It should be. It is against the oath, because the oath says, "and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Trumps statements go against the first amendment.
But per the first amendment the government cannot make a law on what you can and cannot say, also the government cannot say who can and who cannot run for president.

by Valaran » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:15 pm
Ugatoo wrote:To play devils advocate amendments can be amended.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Arlenton » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:15 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Titel der Stadt wrote:It should be. It is against the oath, because the oath says, "and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Trumps statements go against the first amendment.
But per the first amendment the government cannot make a law on what you can and cannot say, also the government cannot say who can and who cannot run for president.

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:15 pm

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:16 pm
Ugatoo wrote:Thermodolia wrote:But per the first amendment the government cannot make a law on what you can and cannot say, also the government cannot say who can and who cannot run for president.
Except for that part where the government says you have to have been born in the US to run for president.

by Wisconsin9 » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:16 pm

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:18 pm
Wisconsin9 wrote:Please don't. I can't think of a better guarantee for Democratic victory than Trump running as the Republican candidate.

by Valaran » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:18 pm
Wisconsin9 wrote:Please don't. I can't think of a better guarantee for Democratic victory than Trump running as the Republican candidate.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:19 pm

by Lordareon » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:19 pm

by Valaran » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:20 pm

Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Arlenton » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:20 pm
Wisconsin9 wrote:Please don't. I can't think of a better guarantee for Democratic victory than Trump running as the Republican candidate.

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:21 pm
Lordareon wrote:"FREEDOM... IS THE SOVEREIGN RIGHT OF EVERY AMERICAN
We need a strong leader who will show the world that we are not be pushed around and that they should kowtow or BE ERADICATED we need to look after are own people ad when this nation is in a good state then help others.

by Atomic Utopia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:21 pm
Lordareon wrote:"FREEDOM... IS THE SOVEREIGN RIGHT OF EVERY AMERICAN
We need a strong leader who will show the world that we are not be pushed around and that they should kowtow or BE ERADICATED we need to look after are own people ad when this nation is in a good state then help others.

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:22 pm

by Roski » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:24 pm

by TVRlandia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:25 pm

by Valaran » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:27 pm
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:29 pm

by Thermodolia » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:30 pm
TVRlandia wrote:I honestly think what Trump is up to is getting Hillary elected. I believe his plan is to displace the chances of all valid Republican candidates from getting traction in the polls. He then creates a monster that gains traction which makes the Right look loony. When it is too late for a valid Republican candidate to gain traction against Hillary, Trump will step aside and the relief will create a groundswell for Clinton's election.
My question is what was he promised by Hillary for his charade he is so perfectly executing?
For the record, I am a die-hard Republican, but Trump is losing the election for "us" who are centrist.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Grinning Dragon, Khardsland, Kizekia, Port Caverton, The Two Jerseys, Vernes, Viteri Sangnam, Wingdings, Yoshilandian Tasmania
Advertisement