Soldati senza confini wrote:Camicon wrote:Let's not pretend otherwise. Firearms were designed to kill things, and as the technology developed and you were actually able to hit what you were aiming at, people decided to do things like target shooing with them.
^ This
Yes, I like guns myself. But I just don't delude myself that guns are not weapons designed to kill. That's exactly what the fuck they were designed to do. That it has multiple purposes, like you would give a hammer multiple purposes? Nobody is denying that, I'm not. But just because you give something a personal purpose that doesn't mean the thing was invented with that particular purpose in mind.
Huh.
I hope we can emphasize rockets being invented with killing people in mind to direct some of that sweet funding that'd otherwise go to the military into NASA. Sure, we can wave off the 'multiple purposes' NASA puts their rockets to, surely if we advertise the totally-sensible standard of all rockets being invented for killing people we can finally get a dedicated launch platform made.
...Of course, we'd be lying but hey, for space, I'm down I suppose...
In any case, too little information to say very much at this point. Rather plausible the 'body armor' might have been load-carrying vests (I believe the same misperception occurred after the Holmes shooting).
Apparently, NYT is reporting a gunfight, 'suspect down', and request for a bearcat (armored vehicle) by the local PD.