Tell me about it my family left Ireland in the 80's to escape the violence.
Advertisement

by Ugatoo » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:12 pm

by Fartsniffage » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:12 pm
Uxupox wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Do you have any friends that have them only for recreational use and would never use them for self defense?
Well in my country (Puerto Rico) gun laws are very strict. Though yes I have a friend regularly goes to the range and uses the weapon that the range owns for recreational use (As in have fun). The weapon he uses on the range is the gun that he technically loans to the range is the AR-15 that given to him by his late grandfather.


by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:13 pm
Camicon wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:I wasn't aware we were talking about you in particular, as the statements made were general statements applied to a broad category of inanimate objects as opposed to yourself.
Let's not pretend otherwise. Firearms were designed to kill things, and as the technology developed and you were actually able to hit what you were aiming at, people decided to do things like target shooing with them.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Ardoki » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:13 pm
Uxupox wrote:Ardoki wrote:The Irish Republican Army had nothing to do with Catholicism. Never did it claim to be acting due to or in favour of Catholicism (or any other type of Christianity). It's motivations and actions were entirely political, it wanted to achieve a united Ireland. Please stop making up lies.
I guess you are right about the Islamic State though.
Never knew the IRA was espousing both a theocracy and an united Ireland at the same time. But hey since this is the internet it must be true.

by Greed and Death » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:13 pm
Uxupox wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Do you have any friends that have them only for recreational use and would never use them for self defense?
Well in my country (Puerto Rico) gun laws are very strict. Though yes I have a friend regularly goes to the range and uses the weapon that the range owns for recreational use (As in have fun). The weapon he uses on the range is the gun that he technically loans to the range is the AR-15 that given to him by his late grandfather.

by Ganos Lao » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:14 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:14 pm

by North Calaveras » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:14 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Camicon wrote:Let's not pretend otherwise. Firearms were designed to kill things, and as the technology developed and you were actually able to hit what you were aiming at, people decided to do things like target shooing with them.
^ This
Yes, I like guns myself. But I just don't delude myself that guns are not weapons designed to kill. That's exactly what the fuck they were designed to do. That it has multiple purposes, like you would give a hammer multiple purposes? Nobody is denying that, I'm not. But just because you give something a personal purpose that doesn't mean the thing was invented with that particular purpose in mind.

by Mushet » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:15 pm

by Uxupox » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:15 pm
greed and death wrote:Uxupox wrote:
Well in my country (Puerto Rico) gun laws are very strict. Though yes I have a friend regularly goes to the range and uses the weapon that the range owns for recreational use (As in have fun). The weapon he uses on the range is the gun that he technically loans to the range is the AR-15 that given to him by his late grandfather.
Sounds like the NRA needs to bring some law suits in PR.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:15 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Camicon wrote:Let's not pretend otherwise. Firearms were designed to kill things, and as the technology developed and you were actually able to hit what you were aiming at, people decided to do things like target shooing with them.
Indeed.
And? This doesn't make all firearms still conform to that 'designed to kill things' anymore than it makes all rockets conform to the same standard.
Technology can change the uses of things and expand their purpose. Not much news there, it's something that's been happening for pretty much all of human history.
The only place 'firearms were designed to kill things' (and nothing else!) claims are appropriate is in discussions of the historical development of firearms in China back in whenever-the-hell. It bears zero relevance to the modern items descended from those 'first' firearms.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Ganos Lao » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:15 pm

by Irona » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:15 pm

by Ardoki » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:15 pm
Ugatoo wrote:Ardoki wrote:The Irish Republican Army had nothing to do with Catholicism. Never did it claim to be acting due to or in favour of Catholicism (or any other type of Christianity). It's motivations and actions were entirely political, it wanted to achieve a united Ireland. Please stop making up lies.
I guess you are right about the Islamic State though.
Yeah Catholic Irish bombing the Protestant English
Nothing to do with religion.

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:16 pm
Ganos Lao wrote:Just took a gander at the scanner.
Apparently a "male with dark skin is all we have on this frequency" the all the policewoman could tell the policeman, who said he was heading towards what sounded like a school.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:16 pm

by Ganos Lao » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:17 pm

by Fartsniffage » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:17 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:Indeed.
And? This doesn't make all firearms still conform to that 'designed to kill things' anymore than it makes all rockets conform to the same standard.
Technology can change the uses of things and expand their purpose. Not much news there, it's something that's been happening for pretty much all of human history.
The only place 'firearms were designed to kill things' (and nothing else!) claims are appropriate is in discussions of the historical development of firearms in China back in whenever-the-hell. It bears zero relevance to the modern items descended from those 'first' firearms.
Like I said, a hammer is meant to be designed for nailing shit; that doesn't mean you can't give it another purpose like break shit.
However, just because you give it a purpose it doesn't change what it was designed for.

by Uxupox » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:17 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Ardoki wrote:I didn't know you believe Islamic State was representative of Islam. Sorry for my error.
I just made a broad statement about why I believed the Islamic State may have justified this attack, based on how some might interpret the Abrahamic texts.
Whether you like it or not, ISIS/ISIL is representative of Islam in the same way that the IRA, or LRA, is representative of Catholicism and Christian Orthodoxy.
It represents the misinformed, misguided, and extreme segments.

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:18 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:18 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
^ This
Yes, I like guns myself. But I just don't delude myself that guns are not weapons designed to kill. That's exactly what the fuck they were designed to do. That it has multiple purposes, like you would give a hammer multiple purposes? Nobody is denying that, I'm not. But just because you give something a personal purpose that doesn't mean the thing was invented with that particular purpose in mind.
Indeed there are many guns designed not to be used to kill, like in the olympics, granted they are vapable but these guns were not made for that purpose.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Ganos Lao » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:18 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:
Got it, still ongoing. I'll be severely disappointed if this is related to an Islamist group.

by Ardoki » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:19 pm
Irona wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
It's was far more complex than that. Religion really didn't have all that much to do with the Troubles, it was more about politics.
Your right it is a hugely complex situation but religion was still at the heart of the conflict. Anybody who claims The Troubles were a solely religious conflict is obviously wrong, but you still have to recognise the part it played.
by Alyakia » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:19 pm

by Noraika » Wed Dec 02, 2015 4:19 pm
LOVEWHOYOUARE~TRANS⚧EQUALITY~~ Economic Left -9.38 | Social Libertarian -2.77 ~
~ 93 Equality - 36 Liberty - 50 Stability ~Democratic Socialism ● Egalitarianism ● Feminism ● LGBT+ rights ● Monarchism ● Social Justice ● Souverainism ● StatismPronouns: She/Her ♀️⛦ Pagan and proud! ⛦⚧Gender and sex aren't the same thing!⚧
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, American Legionaries, Dakran, Google [Bot], Nanatsu no Tsuki, Port Caverton, Stellar Colonies
Advertisement