by Wilgrove » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:01 pm
by Blouman Empire » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:07 pm
by Wilgrove » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:11 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Aren't there a lot of good house going very cheaply at the moment in America?
by Beachchairs » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:14 pm
by Blouman Empire » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:15 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Isn't one of the reason the housing market took a nose dive is because too many people were buying houses they couldn't afford?
I'm just surprised that people are still doing that, and I'm also surprised that banks are still lending out these kinds of loans.
by Grave_n_idle » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:16 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Aren't there a lot of good house going very cheaply at the moment in America?
by Blouman Empire » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:16 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Blouman Empire wrote:Aren't there a lot of good house going very cheaply at the moment in America?
Yep, which is why now is the time to buy buy buy.
by Blouman Empire » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:17 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:No.
Property has been trending back towards a more realistic level after being ridiculously overpriced for many years. It hasn't adjusted far enough, yet... and it might not finish it's adjustment in this economic downturn.
Which means property values now are still way over-represented.
If this market settles now - and those involved directly in the housing market are desperately trying to level it out - anyone buying property at this new level is still going to be stung eventually, when the market finishes this adjustment.
There might be some good houses going 'cheap'. It's certainly not representative.
by Grave_n_idle » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:18 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Isn't one of the reason the housing market took a nose dive is because too many people were buying houses they couldn't afford?
by Grave_n_idle » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:20 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:No.
Property has been trending back towards a more realistic level after being ridiculously overpriced for many years. It hasn't adjusted far enough, yet... and it might not finish it's adjustment in this economic downturn.
Which means property values now are still way over-represented.
If this market settles now - and those involved directly in the housing market are desperately trying to level it out - anyone buying property at this new level is still going to be stung eventually, when the market finishes this adjustment.
There might be some good houses going 'cheap'. It's certainly not representative.
Fair enough, I suppose I have only seen some house prices rather than an average or a trend such as 3 bedroom house I saw being sold by the bank for $10,000
by Wilgrove » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:22 pm
Beachchairs wrote:Leaving the furniture in is often suggested by real estate agents because it makes the house feel homier. It shows that someone could actually live in the house, and is decorativable, etc.
Also house prices vary by region. Vary considerably. You said $300,000 for a house. That sounds like a pittance to me.
by Blouman Empire » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:25 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:That's not strictly speaking accurate - since the bank selling it for 10k doesn't mean it's going to cost you 10k.
That might sound crazy - but you have to bear in mind that what the bank asks you as a price might then open you up to huge amounts of debt which you also assume, and/or huge costs to bring the property to an acceptable level.
In theory, you could buy a 10k house for 10k, then pay off 100k of associated debt, then spend the 90k it costs to get it up to spec...
by Lacadaemon » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:33 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:That's not strictly speaking accurate - since the bank selling it for 10k doesn't mean it's going to cost you 10k.
That might sound crazy - but you have to bear in mind that what the bank asks you as a price might then open you up to huge amounts of debt which you also assume, and/or huge costs to bring the property to an acceptable level.
In theory, you could buy a 10k house for 10k, then pay off 100k of associated debt, then spend the 90k it costs to get it up to spec...
by Lacadaemon » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:36 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:I'll give you that I'm not to sure exactly how it works in America regarding the selling of homes that have been forcloused on, I am aware that one can simply hand back the deed to the house and that is the end of your obligation.
by Tahar Joblis » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:54 pm
Beachchairs wrote:Leaving the furniture in is often suggested by real estate agents because it makes the house feel homier. It shows that someone could actually live in the house, and is decorativable, etc.
Also house prices vary by region. Vary considerably. You said $300,000 for a house. That sounds like a pittance to me.
by Beachchairs » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:00 pm
Tahar Joblis wrote:Beachchairs wrote:Leaving the furniture in is often suggested by real estate agents because it makes the house feel homier. It shows that someone could actually live in the house, and is decorativable, etc.
Also house prices vary by region. Vary considerably. You said $300,000 for a house. That sounds like a pittance to me.
News for them: May work on some, but other people absolutely detest seeing the place cluttered with furniture they simply don't want and will have to go through trouble to get rid of. Stuffed furniture is absolutely terrible for those of us with dust allergies. Can make even just looking a pain. I'm with Wilgrove on this one.
by Tahar Joblis » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:04 pm
Beachchairs wrote:Get rid of? The other people take it with them when they move. Why would you leave your furniture? Do people not know how expensive the shit is?
by Beachchairs » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:12 pm
Tahar Joblis wrote:Beachchairs wrote:Get rid of? The other people take it with them when they move. Why would you leave your furniture? Do people not know how expensive the shit is?
I just helped move my grandmother, so I can answer that. Because it's a pain in the neck to move it and it doesn't always fit in the new place. If it's a long distance, it may be less expensive to buy a new piece than to move the old one all the way over. And yes, people don't always bring all the furniture with them, expensive or not.
by Ryadn » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:30 pm
by Wilgrove » Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:05 am
Ryadn wrote:Sitting on the left coast, I watch those shows and marvel that anyone can buy a home for a measly $300k. Median price in my area has fallen a little, but it's still above $700k.
by Parthenon » Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:48 am
Wilgrove wrote:Ryadn wrote:Sitting on the left coast, I watch those shows and marvel that anyone can buy a home for a measly $300k. Median price in my area has fallen a little, but it's still above $700k.
Well you gotta keep in mind, I live in North Carolina. Here, 300k house gets you a mansion.
by Wilgrove » Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:50 am
Parthenon wrote:Wilgrove wrote:Ryadn wrote:Sitting on the left coast, I watch those shows and marvel that anyone can buy a home for a measly $300k. Median price in my area has fallen a little, but it's still above $700k.
Well you gotta keep in mind, I live in North Carolina. Here, 300k house gets you a mansion.
Wish that was the case in here in the triangle. Where in the dogwood state are you looking to purchase?
by Cabra West » Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:55 am
by Parthenon » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:07 am
Wilgrove wrote:Parthenon wrote:Wish that was the case in here in the triangle. Where in the dogwood state are you looking to purchase?
I'll t'gram that to you. I don't need any NSG stalkers.
by Sarkhaan » Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:54 am
Ryadn wrote:Sitting on the left coast, I watch those shows and marvel that anyone can buy a home for a measly $300k. Median price in my area has fallen a little, but it's still above $700k.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Deblar, Eahland, East Owenistan, El Lazaro, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Plan Neonie, Repreteop, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan, Wisteria and Surrounding Territories
Advertisement