NATION

PASSWORD

Santa Should be Banned

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Fri Dec 04, 2015 7:51 pm

Kannap wrote:
Personal Freedom wrote:What about female Santa type characters?

Sexy

About time we got some equality of the sexes in the whole Santa myth!
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
The Jaclean Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2649
Founded: Nov 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Jaclean Empire » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:14 pm

If you want to have Santa banned... you've gone too far.
A limited Monarchy with high constitutional and civil rights and little economic regulation

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:19 pm

Honestly I find Santa a lot less damaging of a lie to children than say... Christianity.

No wars have been fought over Santa.
No one has ever been stoned to death for being homosexual because Santa disapproves.
No one goes around molesting children under the guise of a servant of Santa.
No one has ever used Santa in defence of their racist hate group.
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Gim
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31363
Founded: Jul 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Gim » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:23 pm

Ugatoo wrote:Honestly I find Santa a lot less damaging of a lie to children than say... Christianity.

No wars have been fought over Santa.
No one has ever been stoned to death for being homosexual because Santa disapproves.
No one goes around molesting children under the guise of a servant of Santa.
No one has ever used Santa in defence of their racist hate group.


Christianity, nowadays, does not support warfare or violence.
All You Need to Know about Gim
Male, 17, Protestant Christian, British

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:26 pm

Gim wrote:
Ugatoo wrote:Honestly I find Santa a lot less damaging of a lie to children than say... Christianity.

No wars have been fought over Santa.
No one has ever been stoned to death for being homosexual because Santa disapproves.
No one goes around molesting children under the guise of a servant of Santa.
No one has ever used Santa in defence of their racist hate group.


Christianity, nowadays, does not support warfare or violence.

But molesting children is still on the table?
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:29 pm

I no way do I support banning santa... but I can at least comprehend your points, though I don't agree with them.

What I don't understand is how it would be logistically possible to ENFORCE a ban on Santa Claus? Does the government force close department stores that have santa? Does it launch a massive lawsuit against the Salvation Army? Does a S.W.A.T. team bust through your window and taze your child if they put out milk and cookies?
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:30 pm

Patridam wrote:I no way do I support banning santa... but I can at least comprehend your points, though I don't agree with them.

What I don't understand is how it would be logistically possible to ENFORCE a ban on Santa Claus? Does the government force close department stores that have santa? Does it launch a massive lawsuit against the Salvation Army? Does a S.W.A.T. team bust through your window and taze your child if they put out milk and cookies?

It's not that hard to enforce a ban on iconography, Germany does it with Nazi related images.
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Vaulfenstein
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Vaulfenstein » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:33 pm

Banning Santa would ruin one man's joy. He has the joy of pretending to be santa. To grow his white beard for every december and just work even though he doesn't have to. He finds it fun, because it's better than the actual holiday, because to him it is the holiday.

Just to be serious now.
Last edited by Vaulfenstein on Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41257
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:34 pm

Ugatoo wrote:
Gim wrote:
Christianity, nowadays, does not support warfare or violence.

But molesting children is still on the table?


What the fuck dude?

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:34 pm

Vaulfenstein wrote:No, we should just turn Santa into a porn-star instead.

Unless you have reasons as to why I'd call this spam.
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:37 pm

Ugatoo wrote:
Patridam wrote:I no way do I support banning santa... but I can at least comprehend your points, though I don't agree with them.

What I don't understand is how it would be logistically possible to ENFORCE a ban on Santa Claus? Does the government force close department stores that have santa? Does it launch a massive lawsuit against the Salvation Army? Does a S.W.A.T. team bust through your window and taze your child if they put out milk and cookies?

It's not that hard to enforce a ban on iconography, Germany does it with Nazi related images.


Yes, and that's Germany. I don't think, for example, America could handle it nearly as well. Blatantly racist/homophobic things get protected under free speech here, as does religious association (although Santa Claus is might disparate from Christianity nowadays), so if very obviously "bad" things get a free pass something (at least widely perceived as) harmless/good isn't going to get censored without a serious fight from both the population and the bill of rights. But I digress, back to Germany:

But do they enforce it within the private home? Such a ban would lose any power if the kids still get taught it at home - and you know almost all parents would recognize such a ban as the crock it is and would go ahead and encourage kids to believe in manta.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Vaulfenstein
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Vaulfenstein » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:38 pm

Banning Santa would be like banning Jesus Christ. I don't doubt there is a church out there that replaces Jesus with Santa.

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:39 pm

Patridam wrote:
Ugatoo wrote:It's not that hard to enforce a ban on iconography, Germany does it with Nazi related images.


Yes, and that's Germany. I don't think, for example, America could handle it nearly as well. Blatantly racist/homophobic things get protected under free speech here, as does religious association (although Santa Claus is might disparate from Christianity nowadays), so if very obviously "bad" things get a free pass something (at least widely perceived as) harmless/good isn't going to get censored without a serious fight from both the population and the bill of rights. But I digress, back to Germany:

But do they enforce it within the private home? Such a ban would lose any power if the kids still get taught it at home - and you know almost all parents would recognize such a ban as the crock it is and would go ahead and encourage kids to believe in manta.

As far as I know there has been no Fourth Reich
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:42 pm

Ugatoo wrote:
Patridam wrote:
Yes, and that's Germany. I don't think, for example, America could handle it nearly as well. Blatantly racist/homophobic things get protected under free speech here, as does religious association (although Santa Claus is might disparate from Christianity nowadays), so if very obviously "bad" things get a free pass something (at least widely perceived as) harmless/good isn't going to get censored without a serious fight from both the population and the bill of rights. But I digress, back to Germany:

But do they enforce it within the private home? Such a ban would lose any power if the kids still get taught it at home - and you know almost all parents would recognize such a ban as the crock it is and would go ahead and encourage kids to believe in manta.

As far as I know there has been no Fourth Reich


Belief in the value of santa claus (not saying adults actually believe he exists, just that they find him a positive force) has got to run in the 90-99% range. Nazism was never that popular, especially immediately following the war. False comparison.

And while it's neither here nor there I don't support banning any ideology or iconography, Nazi or otherwise.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Vaulfenstein
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Vaulfenstein » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:50 pm

Plus you'd be banning tons of bad christmas movies which people like to watch and make fun of.

Who else are we going to make fun of? Soon we'll have a Fourth Reich type thing and this time the French Resistance or whatever will dress like elves and their leader will be Santa Claus. Just saying, humans would do it. Then Santa Claus would be the symbol of warfare and instead of our "peaceful" gods we would actually have a straight up warlord or a god. Then all this would basically happen again except with different land mass probably. Except since this Santa is going to be like a Cossack or something the world's going to start out all Russian/Ukrainian like. Or something.

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:53 pm

Patridam wrote:
Ugatoo wrote:As far as I know there has been no Fourth Reich


Belief in the value of santa claus (not saying adults actually believe he exists, just that they find him a positive force) has got to run in the 90-99% range. Nazism was never that popular, especially immediately following the war. False comparison.

And while it's neither here nor there I don't support banning any ideology or iconography, Nazi or otherwise.

I'd like to see the source for that 90-99% range because anecdotal evidence from my life shows most people either neutral to santa or dislike him because of rampant commercialism
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Personal Freedom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11256
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Personal Freedom » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:00 pm

Ugatoo wrote:
Patridam wrote:
Belief in the value of santa claus (not saying adults actually believe he exists, just that they find him a positive force) has got to run in the 90-99% range. Nazism was never that popular, especially immediately following the war. False comparison.

And while it's neither here nor there I don't support banning any ideology or iconography, Nazi or otherwise.

I'd like to see the source for that 90-99% range because anecdotal evidence from my life shows most people either neutral to santa or dislike him because of rampant commercialism

I'm enraged not because I care about Santa but because this is jingoistic and a violation of human rights. You can't ban traditions because you don't like them. You can only ban what is harmful to others.
Economic Left/Right: -10.0 (previously -6.45)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.18 (previously -4.72 )
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves;
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67203
Founded: May 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kannap » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:03 pm

Vaulfenstein wrote:Banning Santa would ruin one man's joy. He has the joy of pretending to be santa. To grow his white beard for every december and just work even though he doesn't have to. He finds it fun, because it's better than the actual holiday, because to him it is the holiday.

Just to be serious now.


And think of all the unemployment, all those poor jobless mall Santas if you ban Santa.
25 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
RYM || Political test results
.::The List of National Sports::.

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:03 pm

Ugatoo wrote:
Patridam wrote:
Belief in the value of santa claus (not saying adults actually believe he exists, just that they find him a positive force) has got to run in the 90-99% range. Nazism was never that popular, especially immediately following the war. False comparison.

And while it's neither here nor there I don't support banning any ideology or iconography, Nazi or otherwise.

I'd like to see the source for that 90-99% range because anecdotal evidence from my life shows most people either neutral to santa or dislike him because of rampant commercialism


I don't believe there's a source on how many would support a ban on santa or not because it's such an asinine idea that no one outside this website could ever think it up.

Anyway, keep in mind a ban on santa iconography would equate to a ban on the vast vast majority Christmas movies: Miracle on 34th Street, The Santa Clause, Elf, A Christmas Story, How the Grich Stole Christmas Christmas Vacation, Home Alone, The Polar Express.... and several more that have Santa mentioned incidentally, that might not even be Christmas movies.

And probably over 3/4 of holiday-related songs, and the same thing with incidentals, millions upon millions of decorations, and every book that has any portion its story taking place over Christmas - including classics like To Kill a Mockingbird and Little Women.

Do you really think most of the people you know would support taking all of those things and throwing on the burn pile for heresy?
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:05 pm

Patridam wrote:
Ugatoo wrote:I'd like to see the source for that 90-99% range because anecdotal evidence from my life shows most people either neutral to santa or dislike him because of rampant commercialism


I don't believe there's a source on how many would support a ban on santa or not because it's such an asinine idea that no one outside this website could ever think it up.

Anyway, keep in mind a ban on santa iconography would equate to a ban on the vast vast majority Christmas movies: Miracle on 34th Street, The Santa Clause, Elf, A Christmas Story, How the Grich Stole Christmas Christmas Vacation, Home Alone, The Polar Express.... and several more that have Santa mentioned incidentally, that might not even be Christmas movies.

And probably over 3/4 of holiday-related songs, and the same thing with incidentals, millions upon millions of decorations, and every book that has any portion its story taking place over Christmas - including classics like To Kill a Mockingbird and Little Women.

Do you really think most of the people you know would support taking all of those things and throwing on the burn pile for heresy?
See you're acting like losing Christmas movies and songs is a bad thing, legitimately the only thing I'd miss is Die Hard but if that means no Christmas crap I'll do it.
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Vaulfenstein
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Vaulfenstein » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:07 pm

Ugatoo wrote:
Patridam wrote:
I don't believe there's a source on how many would support a ban on santa or not because it's such an asinine idea that no one outside this website could ever think it up.

Anyway, keep in mind a ban on santa iconography would equate to a ban on the vast vast majority Christmas movies: Miracle on 34th Street, The Santa Clause, Elf, A Christmas Story, How the Grich Stole Christmas Christmas Vacation, Home Alone, The Polar Express.... and several more that have Santa mentioned incidentally, that might not even be Christmas movies.

And probably over 3/4 of holiday-related songs, and the same thing with incidentals, millions upon millions of decorations, and every book that has any portion its story taking place over Christmas - including classics like To Kill a Mockingbird and Little Women.

Do you really think most of the people you know would support taking all of those things and throwing on the burn pile for heresy?
See you're acting like losing Christmas movies and songs is a bad thing, legitimately the only thing I'd miss is Die Hard but if that means no Christmas crap I'll do it.

It is a bad thing.

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:08 pm

Ugatoo wrote:
Patridam wrote:
I don't believe there's a source on how many would support a ban on santa or not because it's such an asinine idea that no one outside this website could ever think it up.

Anyway, keep in mind a ban on santa iconography would equate to a ban on the vast vast majority Christmas movies: Miracle on 34th Street, The Santa Clause, Elf, A Christmas Story, How the Grich Stole Christmas Christmas Vacation, Home Alone, The Polar Express.... and several more that have Santa mentioned incidentally, that might not even be Christmas movies.

And probably over 3/4 of holiday-related songs, and the same thing with incidentals, millions upon millions of decorations, and every book that has any portion its story taking place over Christmas - including classics like To Kill a Mockingbird and Little Women.

Do you really think most of the people you know would support taking all of those things and throwing on the burn pile for heresy?
See you're acting like losing Christmas movies and songs is a bad thing, legitimately the only thing I'd miss is Die Hard but if that means no Christmas crap I'll do it.


Yes, I act like it's a bad thing, because it damn well IS a bad thing. With this ban there will literally be no Christmas. In fact, the whole thing sounds like some villain's plan in a Christmas B-movie, not even stealing christmas like the Grinch but just destroying the whole kaboodle and making everyone act like it never existed soley because what? You don't like eggnog?
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

User avatar
Gim
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31363
Founded: Jul 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Gim » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:13 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ugatoo wrote:But molesting children is still on the table?


What the fuck dude?


He's probably referring to Mormonism, which is really not a part of Christianity.
All You Need to Know about Gim
Male, 17, Protestant Christian, British

User avatar
Ugatoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Nov 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:14 pm

Patridam wrote:
Ugatoo wrote:See you're acting like losing Christmas movies and songs is a bad thing, legitimately the only thing I'd miss is Die Hard but if that means no Christmas crap I'll do it.


Yes, I act like it's a bad thing, because it damn well IS a bad thing. With this ban there will literally be no Christmas. In fact, the whole thing sounds like some villain's plan in a Christmas B-movie, not even stealing christmas like the Grinch but just destroying the whole kaboodle and making everyone act like it never existed soley because what? You don't like eggnog?

Oh no! No Christmas? I suppose you'll just have to show your loved ones that you care about them at other non-socially obligated times of the year. You haven't actually made any point as to why Christmas or Santa is important as far as I've seen
Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology but only remember learning about photosynthesis
Unlike marijuana, religion and capitalism will kill you.
Kannap wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:Is Ugatoo really here on their anti-rape crusade? Like seriously, TET is for having a laugh, not a soapbox for someone's rants.


We should banish Ugatoo from TET *nods*

User avatar
Patridam
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5313
Founded: May 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:15 pm

Gim wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
What the fuck dude?


He's probably referring to Mormonism, which is really not a part of Christianity.


I was thinking he meant that whole Catholic priest stereotype myself.
Lassiez Faire Capitalist / Libertarian
Past-Tech (1950s-1980s)

_[' ]_

Republican
White male, 24 yrs old
Michigan, USA
ISTJ
(-_Q)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Calption, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Dakran, Duvniask, Femcia, Grinning Dragon, GuessTheAltAccount, Herador, Kashimura, Reloviskistan, Riviere Renard, Rusozak, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, Thermodolia, Umeria, Valyxias, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads