About time we got some equality of the sexes in the whole Santa myth!
Advertisement

by Hurdegaryp » Fri Dec 04, 2015 7:51 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by The Jaclean Empire » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:14 pm

by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:19 pm

by Gim » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:23 pm
Ugatoo wrote:Honestly I find Santa a lot less damaging of a lie to children than say... Christianity.
No wars have been fought over Santa.
No one has ever been stoned to death for being homosexual because Santa disapproves.
No one goes around molesting children under the guise of a servant of Santa.
No one has ever used Santa in defence of their racist hate group.

by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:26 pm
Gim wrote:Ugatoo wrote:Honestly I find Santa a lot less damaging of a lie to children than say... Christianity.
No wars have been fought over Santa.
No one has ever been stoned to death for being homosexual because Santa disapproves.
No one goes around molesting children under the guise of a servant of Santa.
No one has ever used Santa in defence of their racist hate group.
Christianity, nowadays, does not support warfare or violence.

by Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:29 pm

by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:30 pm
Patridam wrote:I no way do I support banning santa... but I can at least comprehend your points, though I don't agree with them.
What I don't understand is how it would be logistically possible to ENFORCE a ban on Santa Claus? Does the government force close department stores that have santa? Does it launch a massive lawsuit against the Salvation Army? Does a S.W.A.T. team bust through your window and taze your child if they put out milk and cookies?

by Vaulfenstein » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:33 pm

by Fartsniffage » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:34 pm

by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:34 pm
Vaulfenstein wrote:No, we should just turn Santa into a porn-star instead.

by Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:37 pm
Ugatoo wrote:Patridam wrote:I no way do I support banning santa... but I can at least comprehend your points, though I don't agree with them.
What I don't understand is how it would be logistically possible to ENFORCE a ban on Santa Claus? Does the government force close department stores that have santa? Does it launch a massive lawsuit against the Salvation Army? Does a S.W.A.T. team bust through your window and taze your child if they put out milk and cookies?
It's not that hard to enforce a ban on iconography, Germany does it with Nazi related images.

by Vaulfenstein » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:38 pm

by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:39 pm
Patridam wrote:Ugatoo wrote:It's not that hard to enforce a ban on iconography, Germany does it with Nazi related images.
Yes, and that's Germany. I don't think, for example, America could handle it nearly as well. Blatantly racist/homophobic things get protected under free speech here, as does religious association (although Santa Claus is might disparate from Christianity nowadays), so if very obviously "bad" things get a free pass something (at least widely perceived as) harmless/good isn't going to get censored without a serious fight from both the population and the bill of rights. But I digress, back to Germany:
But do they enforce it within the private home? Such a ban would lose any power if the kids still get taught it at home - and you know almost all parents would recognize such a ban as the crock it is and would go ahead and encourage kids to believe in manta.

by Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:42 pm
Ugatoo wrote:Patridam wrote:
Yes, and that's Germany. I don't think, for example, America could handle it nearly as well. Blatantly racist/homophobic things get protected under free speech here, as does religious association (although Santa Claus is might disparate from Christianity nowadays), so if very obviously "bad" things get a free pass something (at least widely perceived as) harmless/good isn't going to get censored without a serious fight from both the population and the bill of rights. But I digress, back to Germany:
But do they enforce it within the private home? Such a ban would lose any power if the kids still get taught it at home - and you know almost all parents would recognize such a ban as the crock it is and would go ahead and encourage kids to believe in manta.
As far as I know there has been no Fourth Reich

by Vaulfenstein » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:50 pm

by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 8:53 pm
Patridam wrote:Ugatoo wrote:As far as I know there has been no Fourth Reich
Belief in the value of santa claus (not saying adults actually believe he exists, just that they find him a positive force) has got to run in the 90-99% range. Nazism was never that popular, especially immediately following the war. False comparison.
And while it's neither here nor there I don't support banning any ideology or iconography, Nazi or otherwise.
by Personal Freedom » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:00 pm
Ugatoo wrote:Patridam wrote:
Belief in the value of santa claus (not saying adults actually believe he exists, just that they find him a positive force) has got to run in the 90-99% range. Nazism was never that popular, especially immediately following the war. False comparison.
And while it's neither here nor there I don't support banning any ideology or iconography, Nazi or otherwise.
I'd like to see the source for that 90-99% range because anecdotal evidence from my life shows most people either neutral to santa or dislike him because of rampant commercialism

by Kannap » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:03 pm
Vaulfenstein wrote:Banning Santa would ruin one man's joy. He has the joy of pretending to be santa. To grow his white beard for every december and just work even though he doesn't have to. He finds it fun, because it's better than the actual holiday, because to him it is the holiday.
Just to be serious now.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:03 pm
Ugatoo wrote:Patridam wrote:
Belief in the value of santa claus (not saying adults actually believe he exists, just that they find him a positive force) has got to run in the 90-99% range. Nazism was never that popular, especially immediately following the war. False comparison.
And while it's neither here nor there I don't support banning any ideology or iconography, Nazi or otherwise.
I'd like to see the source for that 90-99% range because anecdotal evidence from my life shows most people either neutral to santa or dislike him because of rampant commercialism

by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:05 pm
See you're acting like losing Christmas movies and songs is a bad thing, legitimately the only thing I'd miss is Die Hard but if that means no Christmas crap I'll do it.Patridam wrote:Ugatoo wrote:I'd like to see the source for that 90-99% range because anecdotal evidence from my life shows most people either neutral to santa or dislike him because of rampant commercialism
I don't believe there's a source on how many would support a ban on santa or not because it's such an asinine idea that no one outside this website could ever think it up.
Anyway, keep in mind a ban on santa iconography would equate to a ban on the vast vast majority Christmas movies: Miracle on 34th Street, The Santa Clause, Elf, A Christmas Story, How the Grich Stole Christmas Christmas Vacation, Home Alone, The Polar Express.... and several more that have Santa mentioned incidentally, that might not even be Christmas movies.
And probably over 3/4 of holiday-related songs, and the same thing with incidentals, millions upon millions of decorations, and every book that has any portion its story taking place over Christmas - including classics like To Kill a Mockingbird and Little Women.
Do you really think most of the people you know would support taking all of those things and throwing on the burn pile for heresy?

by Vaulfenstein » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:07 pm
Ugatoo wrote:See you're acting like losing Christmas movies and songs is a bad thing, legitimately the only thing I'd miss is Die Hard but if that means no Christmas crap I'll do it.Patridam wrote:
I don't believe there's a source on how many would support a ban on santa or not because it's such an asinine idea that no one outside this website could ever think it up.
Anyway, keep in mind a ban on santa iconography would equate to a ban on the vast vast majority Christmas movies: Miracle on 34th Street, The Santa Clause, Elf, A Christmas Story, How the Grich Stole Christmas Christmas Vacation, Home Alone, The Polar Express.... and several more that have Santa mentioned incidentally, that might not even be Christmas movies.
And probably over 3/4 of holiday-related songs, and the same thing with incidentals, millions upon millions of decorations, and every book that has any portion its story taking place over Christmas - including classics like To Kill a Mockingbird and Little Women.
Do you really think most of the people you know would support taking all of those things and throwing on the burn pile for heresy?

by Patridam » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Ugatoo wrote:See you're acting like losing Christmas movies and songs is a bad thing, legitimately the only thing I'd miss is Die Hard but if that means no Christmas crap I'll do it.Patridam wrote:
I don't believe there's a source on how many would support a ban on santa or not because it's such an asinine idea that no one outside this website could ever think it up.
Anyway, keep in mind a ban on santa iconography would equate to a ban on the vast vast majority Christmas movies: Miracle on 34th Street, The Santa Clause, Elf, A Christmas Story, How the Grich Stole Christmas Christmas Vacation, Home Alone, The Polar Express.... and several more that have Santa mentioned incidentally, that might not even be Christmas movies.
And probably over 3/4 of holiday-related songs, and the same thing with incidentals, millions upon millions of decorations, and every book that has any portion its story taking place over Christmas - including classics like To Kill a Mockingbird and Little Women.
Do you really think most of the people you know would support taking all of those things and throwing on the burn pile for heresy?

by Ugatoo » Fri Dec 04, 2015 9:14 pm
Patridam wrote:Ugatoo wrote:See you're acting like losing Christmas movies and songs is a bad thing, legitimately the only thing I'd miss is Die Hard but if that means no Christmas crap I'll do it.
Yes, I act like it's a bad thing, because it damn well IS a bad thing. With this ban there will literally be no Christmas. In fact, the whole thing sounds like some villain's plan in a Christmas B-movie, not even stealing christmas like the Grinch but just destroying the whole kaboodle and making everyone act like it never existed soley because what? You don't like eggnog?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Calption, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Dakran, Duvniask, Femcia, Grinning Dragon, GuessTheAltAccount, Herador, Kashimura, Reloviskistan, Riviere Renard, Rusozak, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, Thermodolia, Umeria, Valyxias, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement