All Cars Should Be Tracked and Locked

[The Wolfussian Colony of Oceania]

All hail big Brother.

I love this idea.

[Galloism]

All hail big Brother.

I love this idea.

How would YOU pay for the trillions it'll cost?

[The Two Jerseys]

You know, doing all the research for this thread makes me REALLY want a WAAS receiver system for my airplane. It's flat out amazing.

Someone get to work and figure out how to make the government pay for it.

I have the solution. Wait for this to pass, take the GPS receiver out of your car, and mount it in your airplane. The only downside is, you'll be getting a lot of speeding tickets.

For that matter, how would the system treat an amphibious car?

[Gun Manufacturers]

I have the solution. Wait for this to pass, take the GPS receiver out of your car, and mount it in your airplane. The only downside is, you'll be getting a lot of speeding tickets.

For that matter, how would the system treat an amphibious car?

It would be like dividing by 0, and it would explode.

[Esternial]

Now that I think about it, maybe we can track and lock more things than just cars?

Bikes? Cutlery? Guns? Power outlets?

[The Wolfussian Colony of Oceania]

All hail big Brother.

I love this idea.

How would YOU pay for the trillions it'll cost?

Why do we even have welfare anyway? I cant think of one reason.

[Vassenor]

How would YOU pay for the trillions it'll cost?

Why do we even have welfare anyway? I cant think of one reason.

Because people need to stay alive and not starve to death while they're trying to find work.

[Galloism]

How would YOU pay for the trillions it'll cost?

Why do we even have welfare anyway? I cant think of one reason.

You could cancel every welfare program in the country, including social security, and it wouldn't be enough.

[Ifreann]

Now that I think about it, maybe we can track and lock more things than just cars?

Bikes? Cutlery? Guns? Power outlets?

Dogs? Suits?

[Galloism]

Now that I think about it, maybe we can track and lock more things than just cars?

Bikes? Cutlery? Guns? Power outlets?

Dogs? Suits?

Boxing gloves.

*nods*

[Ifreann]

Dogs? Suits?

Boxing gloves.

*nods*

Could we track the Socratic method somehow?

[Galloism]

Boxing gloves.

*nods*

Could we track the Socratic method somehow?

Tracking intangibles is imposs-

*electrically shocked*

I mean, "we'll figure it out. You're insulting the United States ingenuity if you think we can't figure out how to GPS track intangible concepts."

[Gauthier]

Could we track the Socratic method somehow?

Tracking intangibles is imposs-

*electrically shocked*

I mean, "we'll figure it out. You're insulting the United States ingenuity if you think we can't figure out how to GPS track intangible concepts."

Tracking chips can be sewn into every suit made, and wi-fi surveillance cameras can be installed in every bedroom across the country to make sure nobody is making their beds as well!

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Could we track the Socratic method somehow?

Tracking intangibles is imposs-

*electrically shocked*

I mean, "we'll figure it out. You're insulting the United States ingenuity if you think we can't figure out how to GPS track intangible concepts."

I... I... I love you. Marry me.

[Gauthier]

Tracking intangibles is imposs-

*electrically shocked*

I mean, "we'll figure it out. You're insulting the United States ingenuity if you think we can't figure out how to GPS track intangible concepts."

I... I... I love you. Marry me.

I see someone has the remote for the collar.

[Ifreann]

Could we track the Socratic method somehow?

Tracking intangibles is imposs-

*electrically shocked*

I mean, "we'll figure it out. You're insulting the United States ingenuity if you think we can't figure out how to GPS track intangible concepts."

Excellent!

[Hetland 2]

Dogs? Suits?

Boxing gloves.

*nods*

I'm all for tracking boxing gloves. Someone keeps running up and punching me with them.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Boxing gloves.

*nods*

I'm all for tracking boxing gloves. Someone keeps running up and punching me with them.

Is it your brother?

[Ifreann]

I'm all for tracking boxing gloves. Someone keeps running up and punching me with them.

Is it your brother?

Is it Conor McGregor?

[Hetland 2]

I'm all for tracking boxing gloves. Someone keeps running up and punching me with them.

Is it your brother?

Is it your brother?

Is it Conor McGregor?

Yes to both.Quietly googles who that is.

[Ifreann]

Is it your brother?

Is it Conor McGregor?

Yes to both.Quietly googles who that is.

I'm given to understand that he kicks the shit out of people for a living.

[Farnhamia]

The whole, ''X doesn't have a right to argue Y because they've also said Z'' is a character attack fallacy and not a legitimate debate tactic. Why? Regardless of whether or not X also said Z, the content of point Y deserves its independent analysis of whether or not its a valuable point (the authorship is irrelevant).

To draw an inference about the validity (or lack of) of point Y based on the character or actions of author X, would be prejudicial. Its probative effect (limited to non-existent) would be far outweighed by its prejudicial effect. To infer a lack of validity (or validity) of a point merely on the account of actions or character traits of its authors (which are in of themselves alleged), would be to commit a character attack flaw. Its a distraction from the main issues of the inquiry.

Please don't try to be all technically-minded on any of this, when its been clear for a very long time your primary function in posting any of this is to get a reaction from people - which they continue to give you, in droves, eeeeevery troll-in-sheeps-clothing OP you toss out there. Yes, me included due to my disbelief that so many argue so hard for so little for so long. Every. Damn. Time. Your OPs tend to be disingenuous, full of click-and-respond bait for the NSG forum, and you regularly get personal and then cry foul when anyone else responds even slightly in kind. You regularly ignore pertinent points in favor of vapid responses and pithy counterarguments that do nothing to give a worthwhile answer, and everything to drive the rabid 'take down the 'shroom with logic' mindset.

It's ridiculous, the whole thing. And frankly, I've better things to do having said my piece. Good luck - not that you've needed it in your rather long and spotted career here.

Unofficial warning for baiting.

[Gurori]

Your posts cause quite the controversy but I'm just going to post my opinion instead of a 20 paragraph long hi-jack.

No tracking unless you're a convict.

[Valystria]

Your posts cause quite the controversy but I'm just going to post my opinion instead of a 20 paragraph long hi-jack.

No tracking unless you're a convict.

Everyone with a record of drug possession gets a tracker in their car? Why? Aren't illicit drug users stigmatized enough already?

[Gauthier]

Your posts cause quite the controversy but I'm just going to post my opinion instead of a 20 paragraph long hi-jack.

No tracking unless you're a convict.

Everyone with a record of drug possession gets a tracker in their car? Why? Aren't illicit drug users stigmatized enough already?

You're preaching the Gospel of Mushroom and now you're concerned about convicts being tracked as a stigma?