Has Political Correctness Gone too Far?

[Ostroeuropa]

Not so. I can point out why their use in specific instances is a social evil.

Violence is a tool, but there is a difference between a thug beating people up to take their money, and someone who's role in society is to take down the thug.

PC should be used to suppress SJWs, feminists, and social conservatives and prevent them from abusing positions of power, or attaining them, which they have shown repeatedly they will use to infest institutions with more of their kind and engage on witch hunts against critics, before curtailing mens rights in the institutions they capture and breeding misandry.

I wouldn't let the Klan obtain offices either, why would I let a feminist?

Special Snowflake Pleading. More Nietzhean hypocrisy.

On the contrary. I'm only in favor of suppressing specific types of ideology that have proven themselves dangerous to society. My default position is to allow people a chance. Institutional Feminists and such meanwhile, have a default position of assuming you have to agree with them or they'll suppress you.

These are two very different stances.

It's the difference between a one party state, and a state which bans a terrorist organization.

[Bogdanov Vishniac]

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/37b2na/serious_sjws_of_reddit_what_is_your_response_to/


Also nails why political correctness is bad and SJWs are terrible for society.



Instead of engaging in a disucssion, the SJWs take the time to bitch and complain that they are offended.

SJW's are pr ogres, bruh.

And free meal tickets for journalists and dying news media outlets who make a living perpetuating the outrage counter-outrage counter-counter-outrage cycle. Similar to how people do the same thing for 'Millennial'.

[Ostroeuropa]

SJW's are pr ogres, bruh.

And free meal tickets for journalists and dying news media outlets who make a living perpetuating the outrage counter-outrage counter-counter-outrage cycle. Similar to how people do the same thing for 'Millennial'.

Two classes of people who are rapidly becoming useless to society develop a symbiotic relationship.
Gender studies graduates and journalists.

[Gauthier]

Special Snowflake Pleading. More Nietzhean hypocrisy.

On the contrary. I'm only in favor of suppressing specific types of ideology that have proven themselves dangerous to society. My default position is to allow people a chance. Institutional Feminists and such meanwhile, have a default position of assuming you have to agree with them or they'll suppress you.

These are two very different stances.

It's the difference between a one party state, and a state which bans a terrorist organization.

It's Justified When WE Do It.

Pure Consistency and Integrity. Why not call for the extermination of all women for bonus points?

[Ostroeuropa]

On the contrary. I'm only in favor of suppressing specific types of ideology that have proven themselves dangerous to society. My default position is to allow people a chance. Institutional Feminists and such meanwhile, have a default position of assuming you have to agree with them or they'll suppress you.

These are two very different stances.

It's the difference between a one party state, and a state which bans a terrorist organization.

It's Justified When WE Do It.

Pure Consistency and Integrity. Why not call for the extermination of all women for bonus points?

I've literally just explained to you why you're wrong, but it sailed right over your head. That's assuming you're genuine, ofcourse.

[Gauthier]

It's Justified When WE Do It.

Pure Consistency and Integrity. Why not call for the extermination of all women for bonus points?

I've literally just explained to you why you're wrong, but it sailed right over your head. That's assuming you're genuine, ofcourse.

You rant about Special Snowflakes only to do it yourself.

More Consistency.

[Morr]

And free meal tickets for journalists and dying news media outlets who make a living perpetuating the outrage counter-outrage counter-counter-outrage cycle. Similar to how people do the same thing for 'Millennial'.

Two classes of people who are rapidly becoming useless to society develop a symbiotic relationship.
Gender studies graduates and journalists.

Gender shouldn't be an academic study?
Journalism is a bad thing?

[Ostroeuropa]

Two classes of people who are rapidly becoming useless to society develop a symbiotic relationship.
Gender studies graduates and journalists.

Gender shouldn't be an academic study?
Journalism is a bad thing?

Perhaps it should, but not as it currently is done. There is a complete lack of actual academics, scientific rigour, etc. It's all a pack of lies and an indoctrination process, and is kept that way by bigots and misandrists running the show and suppressing dissent, an example of why these people cannot be allowed to control any institution.

As for journalism, no, it's not a bad thing.
Nor are horse drawn carriages.

[Dragonia Re Xzua]

It's Justified When WE Do It.

Pure Consistency and Integrity. Why not call for the extermination of all women for bonus points?

I've literally just explained to you why you're wrong, but it sailed right over your head. That's assuming you're genuine, ofcourse.

Because Gauth doesn't let facts and logic get in the way of anything, just as long as his emotions trump everyone else, as seen in many of his posts.

[Morr]

Gender shouldn't be an academic study?
Journalism is a bad thing?

Perhaps it should, but not as it currently is done. There is a complete lack of actual academics, scientific rigour, etc. It's all a pack of lies and an indoctrination process, and is kept that way by bigots and misandrists running the show and suppressing dissent, an example of why these people cannot be allowed to control any institution.

As for journalism, no, it's not a bad thing.
Nor are horse drawn carriages.

Gender studies are one of the humanities, not natural science.

I'm not sure what your point is about journalism. It's obsolete?

[Ostroeuropa]

Perhaps it should, but not as it currently is done. There is a complete lack of actual academics, scientific rigour, etc. It's all a pack of lies and an indoctrination process, and is kept that way by bigots and misandrists running the show and suppressing dissent, an example of why these people cannot be allowed to control any institution.

As for journalism, no, it's not a bad thing.
Nor are horse drawn carriages.

Gender studies are one of the humanities, not natural science.

I'm not sure what your point is about journalism. It's obsolete?

Mass journalism is fairly obsolete, yes.

[Dragonia Re Xzua]

Perhaps it should, but not as it currently is done. There is a complete lack of actual academics, scientific rigour, etc. It's all a pack of lies and an indoctrination process, and is kept that way by bigots and misandrists running the show and suppressing dissent, an example of why these people cannot be allowed to control any institution.

As for journalism, no, it's not a bad thing.
Nor are horse drawn carriages.

Gender studies are one of the humanities, not natural science.

I'm not sure what your point is about journalism. It's obsolete?

Journalism in general is not obsolete, it just gets fragged if it (a) doesn't fit the agenda of a particular news organization, or (b) is labeled politically incorrect by nutjobs looking for attention.

[Morr]

Gender studies are one of the humanities, not natural science.

I'm not sure what your point is about journalism. It's obsolete?

Mass journalism is fairly obsolete, yes.

What has replaced journalism?

[Dragonia Re Xzua]

Mass journalism is fairly obsolete, yes.

What has replaced journalism?

Independent journalism, to a degree.

[Ostroeuropa]

What has replaced journalism?

Independent journalism, to a degree.

This.

It's sort of like how the gaming industry is in trouble. These massive institutions and such have built themselves up, and now technology has made them obsolete.

[Ostroeuropa]

http://www.onionstudios.com/videos/prog ... chair-3494


The onion is loling at PC culture, so it's pretty much official

[Gauthier]

Independent journalism, to a degree.

This.

It's sort of like how the gaming industry is in trouble. These massive institutions and such have built themselves up, and now technology has made them obsolete.

Independent Journalism with nothing to verify their accuracy.

Truthiness is the new cocaine. And no doubt something you'd rant about when The Other Side does it.

[Ostroeuropa]

This.

It's sort of like how the gaming industry is in trouble. These massive institutions and such have built themselves up, and now technology has made them obsolete.

Independent Journalism with nothing to verify their accuracy.

Truthiness is the new cocaine. And no doubt something you'd rant about when The Other Side does it.

Mainstream Journalism /=/ Accuracy. The opposite has been consistently shown.

[Valystria]

I've literally just explained to you why you're wrong, but it sailed right over your head. That's assuming you're genuine, ofcourse.

Because Gauth doesn't let facts and logic get in the way of anything, just as long as his emotions trump everyone else, as seen in many of his posts.

Before I started over on NS I had that same off-the-wall emotional kneejerk reaction to everything, making every post as emotionally loaded as Gauthier's. Then I was given antidepressants and I've been a lot more mellow since then, focusing on actual content instead of just OH MY GOD YOU [INSERT BUZZWORD], OMG OMG [INSERT EMOTIONALLY LOADED SCENE HERE].

Seriously though, I'd recommend antidepressants to anyone who finds themselves unhealthily emotionally invested in posting. It's not okay making every post with shrilling emotional rhetoric as a standard posting style.

Two classes of people who are rapidly becoming useless to society develop a symbiotic relationship.
Gender studies graduates and journalists.

Gender shouldn't be an academic study?
Journalism is a bad thing?

Gender studies shouldn't exist as its own field. Gender can be a subfield of other fields. Gender psychology, gender sociology, etc.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/37b2na/serious_sjws_of_reddit_what_is_your_response_to/


Also nails why political correctness is bad and SJWs are terrible for society.



Instead of engaging in a disucssion, the SJWs take the time to bitch and complain that they are offended.

SJW's are pr ogres, bruh.

When all you can do is engage in name calling... it means you have nothing to make your case on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

[Morr]

Independent journalism, to a degree.

This.

It's sort of like how the gaming industry is in trouble. These massive institutions and such have built themselves up, and now technology has made them obsolete.

Who are some your favorite independent journalists?

[Ostroeuropa]

This.

It's sort of like how the gaming industry is in trouble. These massive institutions and such have built themselves up, and now technology has made them obsolete.

Who are some your favorite independent journalists?

Secular Talk is pretty good, Sargon of Akkad, Amazing Atheist, but for the most part, it's worth going to places like reddit and seeing the publics commentary on news.
Often, the upvoted comments will have citations and such pointing out why the article is a pack of lies.

A lot of articles about SJW or feminist bullshit disable comments to prevent exactly this debunking.

[Morr]

Gender studies shouldn't exist as its own field. Gender can be a subfield of other fields. Gender psychology, gender sociology, etc.

Gender studies more has to do with met analysis of other humanities. If you try to slice it up for each of the humanities it applies to, it sort of defeats the purpose of more unified theory.

When all you can do is engage in name calling... it means you have nothing to make your case on.

That's not name calling. I'm saying SJW's are progress, which you support.

[Ostroeuropa]

Gender studies shouldn't exist as its own field. Gender can be a subfield of other fields. Gender psychology, gender sociology, etc.

Gender studies more has to do with met analysis of other humanities. If you try to slice it up for each of the humanities it applies to, it sort of defeats the purpose of more unified theory.

When all you can do is engage in name calling... it means you have nothing to make your case on.

That's not name calling. I'm saying SJW's are progress, which you support.

SJWs are regressive, not progressive.
Further, gender studies as it is currently constituted is extremely sexist and bigoted.

[Gauthier]

Because Gauth doesn't let facts and logic get in the way of anything, just as long as his emotions trump everyone else, as seen in many of his posts.

Before I started over on NS I had that same off-the-wall emotional kneejerk reaction to everything, making every post as emotionally loaded as Gauthier's. Then I was given antidepressants and I've been a lot more mellow since then, focusing on actual content instead of just OH MY GOD YOU [INSERT BUZZWORD], OMG OMG [INSERT EMOTIONALLY LOADED SCENE HERE].

Seriously though, I'd recommend antidepressants to anyone who finds themselves unhealthily emotionally invested in posting. It's not okay making every post with shrilling emotional rhetoric as a standard posting style.

It's not a character attack when you do it. *nod nod*

[Morr]

Who are some your favorite independent journalists?

Secular Talk is pretty good, Sargon of Akkad, Amazing Atheist, but for the most part, it's worth going to places like reddit and seeing the publics commentary on news.
Often, the upvoted comments will have citations and such pointing out why the article is a pack of lies.

A lot of articles about SJW or feminist bullshit disable comments to prevent exactly this debunking.