by Iwassoclose » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:01 am
by Iwassoclose » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:07 am
Ashmoria wrote:maybe you should check the customer reviews on amazon.
by Iwassoclose » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:08 am
by Alyakia » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:08 am
by Iwassoclose » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:12 am
Alyakia wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
A common method of deliberately limiting a product's useful life is to use inferior materials in critical areas, or deliberately suboptimal component layouts which cause excessive wear. Using soft metal in screws and cheap plastic instead of metal in stress-bearing components will increase the speed at which a product will become inoperable through normal usage and render it prone to breakage from even minor forms of abnormal usage.
by Frank Zipper » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:26 am
by The Serbian Empire » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:29 am
Alyakia wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence
by Herrebrugh » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:33 am
by Saiwania » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:38 am
by Uxupox » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:39 am
Iwassoclose wrote:In the past few months, I have replaced 3 ear buds and its going to be 4 soon as my current one is only working on one side. All the problems stem from the same problem with the jack where the ear bud is connected to a device. It starts when one earbud stops working with the other soon following. This has happened with expensive and the cheap earbuds I have had in the past. The solution for this would be pretty easy, put in a bigger more insulated jack and the few inches of wire on top of that but I haven't seen this anywhere.
Does anyone else think there is a global conspiracy on keeping a defective yet on demand item on the market so we spend more money on said product every few weeks/months?
by Tolko Temnota » Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:22 am
Iwassoclose wrote:Alyakia wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescenceA common method of deliberately limiting a product's useful life is to use inferior materials in critical areas, or deliberately suboptimal component layouts which cause excessive wear. Using soft metal in screws and cheap plastic instead of metal in stress-bearing components will increase the speed at which a product will become inoperable through normal usage and render it prone to breakage from even minor forms of abnormal usage.
I knew it was a thing
by Mike from Progressive » Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:34 am
by Tolko Temnota » Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:36 am
Mike from Progressive wrote:I've had mine for a couple of years. Instead of blaming the product, maybe the operator? *cough cough hint hint*
by Mike from Progressive » Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:45 am
by Tolko Temnota » Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:52 am
Mike from Progressive wrote:Tolko Temnota wrote:Not all earbuds are created equal.
Exactly, which is why we should have separate but equal policies in place. For example on the shelf the white earbuds are on the front while the black ones are in the back. We leave the yellow ones where they are because they work well. The red colored earbuds are given their own little promotional stand in the corner of the store separate from the other ones. That's their stand! And it's the least we can do. Finally, we burn all beats ones. They're the Jersey shore of earbuds and a disease.
by The Two Jerseys » Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:10 am
by Gauthier » Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:20 am
Planned obsolescence tends to work best when a producer has at least an oligopoly. Before introducing a planned obsolescence, the producer has to know that the consumer is at least somewhat likely to buy a replacement from them. In these cases of planned obsolescence, there is an information asymmetry between the producer – who knows how long the product was designed to last – and the consumer, who does not. When a market becomes more competitive, product lifespans tend to increase. For example, when Japanese vehicles with longer lifespans entered the American market in the 1960s and 1970s, American carmakers were forced to respond by building more durable products. The interesting fact is that in the 1980s, Japanese car makers realized the size of the American buying force and began making and sustaining durable, reliable cars that left American automakers behind when consumers realized the new quality of the Japanese automobiles.
by Tolko Temnota » Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:07 am
Gauthier wrote:Tolko Temnota wrote:Yeah this isn't just earbuds. Cell phones, textbooks, certain video games, laptops...planned obsolescence has been a thing for a while now. Companies always want more profit.
Shit like that only happens when a market is cornered.Planned obsolescence tends to work best when a producer has at least an oligopoly. Before introducing a planned obsolescence, the producer has to know that the consumer is at least somewhat likely to buy a replacement from them. In these cases of planned obsolescence, there is an information asymmetry between the producer – who knows how long the product was designed to last – and the consumer, who does not. When a market becomes more competitive, product lifespans tend to increase. For example, when Japanese vehicles with longer lifespans entered the American market in the 1960s and 1970s, American carmakers were forced to respond by building more durable products. The interesting fact is that in the 1980s, Japanese car makers realized the size of the American buying force and began making and sustaining durable, reliable cars that left American automakers behind when consumers realized the new quality of the Japanese automobiles.
by Obexer » Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:10 am
Iwassoclose wrote:Does anyone else think there is a global conspiracy on keeping a defective yet on demand item on the market so we spend more money on said product every few weeks/months?
by Gauthier » Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:15 am
Daburuetchi wrote:Clearly a Mossad/CIA scheme
by Katganistan » Sun Nov 22, 2015 11:18 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anarcopia, Cannot think of a name, Emotional Support Crocodile, Philjia, Senkaku
Advertisement