Advertisement

by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 17, 2018 8:35 am

by Petrolheadia » Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:52 am

by East Fredonia » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:35 pm
Petrolheadia wrote:Imagine it's 1987. You're a Tennessee fertilizer factory worker with a wife and 4 kids. Your younger son is turning 16 next year, and he wants "some sort of a muscle, sports car" as his first car. The budget is meager, but it still allows for a purchase of some (thankfully!) relatively low-power vehicle. It has to be cheap to run and safe. The options are:
- 1972 automatic 225 ci Dodge Challenger coupe,
- 1974 automatic 2.0 Mercury Capri coupe,
- 1973 manual 1.3 VW Karmann-Ghia coupe.
Which one would you buy?
I'd choose the Dodge. Reliable engine, pretty cheap parts, good interior space, well-liked pony car styling.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Well, that's part of a larger problem in general where the younger generation is being priced out of f***ing everything and instead of addressing the mess they made the older generation is blaming it on f***ing avocado toast. But that's another thread.

by NeoOasis » Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:57 pm
East Fredonia wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:Imagine it's 1987. You're a Tennessee fertilizer factory worker with a wife and 4 kids. Your younger son is turning 16 next year, and he wants "some sort of a muscle, sports car" as his first car. The budget is meager, but it still allows for a purchase of some (thankfully!) relatively low-power vehicle. It has to be cheap to run and safe. The options are:
- 1972 automatic 225 ci Dodge Challenger coupe,
- 1974 automatic 2.0 Mercury Capri coupe,
- 1973 manual 1.3 VW Karmann-Ghia coupe.
Which one would you buy?
I'd choose the Dodge. Reliable engine, pretty cheap parts, good interior space, well-liked pony car styling.
Why no Ford Maverick?

by Auzkhia » Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:02 pm

by Petrolheadia » Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:37 pm
East Fredonia wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:Imagine it's 1987. You're a Tennessee fertilizer factory worker with a wife and 4 kids. Your younger son is turning 16 next year, and he wants "some sort of a muscle, sports car" as his first car. The budget is meager, but it still allows for a purchase of some (thankfully!) relatively low-power vehicle. It has to be cheap to run and safe. The options are:
- 1972 automatic 225 ci Dodge Challenger coupe,
- 1974 automatic 2.0 Mercury Capri coupe,
- 1973 manual 1.3 VW Karmann-Ghia coupe.
Which one would you buy?
I'd choose the Dodge. Reliable engine, pretty cheap parts, good interior space, well-liked pony car styling.
Why no Ford Maverick?

by Petrolheadia » Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:09 pm
Auzkhia wrote:What's your local car scene like?
In Pennsylvania, there's always going to be at least a couple of tuned Golfs or Jettas at every car meet, show, and C&C. We call those PA Dubbers.

by Petrolheadia » Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:09 pm

by Petrolheadia » Thu Feb 22, 2018 3:17 pm

by Auzkhia » Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:47 pm
Petrolheadia wrote:What's the deal with fast-food-branded donk cars?
Personally, I think it's some kind of a parody of racing liveries by sticking one on something that is very, very far from a racecar.

by The Two Jerseys » Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:53 pm
Auzkhia wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:What's the deal with fast-food-branded donk cars?
Personally, I think it's some kind of a parody of racing liveries by sticking one on something that is very, very far from a racecar.
Yes, they're supposed to be silly and satirical.
Speaking of which, would you rather have to drive a stanced car or a Donk, assuming both are the same exact car.
by Cannot think of a name » Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:31 pm
Auzkhia wrote:What's your local car scene like?
In Pennsylvania, there's always going to be at least a couple of tuned Golfs or Jettas at every car meet, show, and C&C. We call those PA Dubbers.

by NeoOasis » Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:32 pm
Auzkhia wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:What's the deal with fast-food-branded donk cars?
Personally, I think it's some kind of a parody of racing liveries by sticking one on something that is very, very far from a racecar.
Yes, they're supposed to be silly and satirical.
Speaking of which, would you rather have to drive a stanced car or a Donk, assuming both are the same exact car.

by Costa Fierro » Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:39 pm
Auzkhia wrote:What's your local car scene like?
by Cannot think of a name » Thu Feb 22, 2018 9:38 pm
Auzkhia wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:What's the deal with fast-food-branded donk cars?
Personally, I think it's some kind of a parody of racing liveries by sticking one on something that is very, very far from a racecar.
Yes, they're supposed to be silly and satirical.
Speaking of which, would you rather have to drive a stanced car or a Donk, assuming both are the same exact car.


by Auzkhia » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:10 pm

by Petrolheadia » Fri Feb 23, 2018 6:58 am
Auzkhia wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:What's the deal with fast-food-branded donk cars?
Personally, I think it's some kind of a parody of racing liveries by sticking one on something that is very, very far from a racecar.
Yes, they're supposed to be silly and satirical.
Speaking of which, would you rather have to drive a stanced car or a Donk, assuming both are the same exact car.

by Aillyria » Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:33 am
Auzkhia wrote:What's your local car scene like?
In Pennsylvania, there's always going to be at least a couple of tuned Golfs or Jettas at every car meet, show, and C&C. We call those PA Dubbers.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

by Petrolheadia » Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:46 am

by Auzkhia » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:15 am
Petrolheadia wrote:Imagine it's 1992. You are a 46-year-old married fertilizer factory worker from Tennessee with 4 kids. Your older daughter is turning 16, so you're looking for a cheap car for her. It has to be relatively cheap and easy-to-own, as well as quite safe. The options are:
- 1979 260 ci Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme,
- 1977 232 ci 4WD International Harvester Scout II,
- 1976 2.0 Saab 99 sedan.
Which one would you buy?
I think I'd risk it and end up buying the Saab.
Aillyria wrote:Auzkhia wrote:What's your local car scene like?
In Pennsylvania, there's always going to be at least a couple of tuned Golfs or Jettas at every car meet, show, and C&C. We call those PA Dubbers.
Alot of 90s to mid 2000s Hondas (mostly Accords and Civics), Mustangs and Cougars (all eras), Teslas, BMWs (mostly 3series or 5series), Miatas, RX7s (mostly FCs, occasionally FDs), MR2s (usually SW20s).....all I can think off the top of my head.

by Petrolheadia » Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:54 am
Auzkhia wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:Imagine it's 1992. You are a 46-year-old married fertilizer factory worker from Tennessee with 4 kids. Your older daughter is turning 16, so you're looking for a cheap car for her. It has to be relatively cheap and easy-to-own, as well as quite safe. The options are:
- 1979 260 ci Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme,
- 1977 232 ci 4WD International Harvester Scout II,
- 1976 2.0 Saab 99 sedan.
Which one would you buy?
I think I'd risk it and end up buying the Saab.
Saabs are safe, so safe that it bankrupted them.Aillyria wrote:Alot of 90s to mid 2000s Hondas (mostly Accords and Civics), Mustangs and Cougars (all eras), Teslas, BMWs (mostly 3series or 5series), Miatas, RX7s (mostly FCs, occasionally FDs), MR2s (usually SW20s).....all I can think off the top of my head.
Which state?

by Aillyria » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:13 pm
Auzkhia wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:Imagine it's 1992. You are a 46-year-old married fertilizer factory worker from Tennessee with 4 kids. Your older daughter is turning 16, so you're looking for a cheap car for her. It has to be relatively cheap and easy-to-own, as well as quite safe. The options are:
- 1979 260 ci Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme,
- 1977 232 ci 4WD International Harvester Scout II,
- 1976 2.0 Saab 99 sedan.
Which one would you buy?
I think I'd risk it and end up buying the Saab.
Saabs are safe, so safe that it bankrupted them.Aillyria wrote:Alot of 90s to mid 2000s Hondas (mostly Accords and Civics), Mustangs and Cougars (all eras), Teslas, BMWs (mostly 3series or 5series), Miatas, RX7s (mostly FCs, occasionally FDs), MR2s (usually SW20s).....all I can think off the top of my head.
Which state?
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

by Auzkhia » Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:41 pm

by Patridam » Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:01 am
Petrolheadia wrote:Imagine it's 1992. You are a 46-year-old married fertilizer factory worker from Tennessee with 4 kids. Your older daughter is turning 16, so you're looking for a cheap car for her. It has to be relatively cheap and easy-to-own, as well as quite safe. The options are:
- 1979 260 ci Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme,
- 1977 232 ci 4WD International Harvester Scout II,
- 1976 2.0 Saab 99 sedan.
Which one would you buy?
I think I'd risk it and end up buying the Saab.

by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:28 am
Patridam wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:Imagine it's 1992. You are a 46-year-old married fertilizer factory worker from Tennessee with 4 kids. Your older daughter is turning 16, so you're looking for a cheap car for her. It has to be relatively cheap and easy-to-own, as well as quite safe. The options are:
- 1979 260 ci Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme,
- 1977 232 ci 4WD International Harvester Scout II,
- 1976 2.0 Saab 99 sedan.
Which one would you buy?
I think I'd risk it and end up buying the Saab.
The Cutlass. By all means a very competent all around package of a car back in the day (even according to reviews of the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DErl3b7T7Vk, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQZFM7A7zKU) which is why it became popular, its safety was perhaps not as designed-in as the Saab, but the size more than made up for that; and almost anything is safer than a Scout. Plus she'll appreciate the comfort and better power, and your pocketbook will appreciate the ease of finding parts for literally the most popular car in America.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0cala, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, El Lazaro, The Most Grand Feline Empire, The Pirateariat, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement