United States of Conner wrote:I dont know how to convince some people that I would rather go sit in a nice little café than go to church. It doesn't seem complex.
Find a cafe called "Church", then tell people you're going to church.
Advertisement
by The Grim Reaper » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:49 am
United States of Conner wrote:I dont know how to convince some people that I would rather go sit in a nice little café than go to church. It doesn't seem complex.
by Hurdegaryp » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:49 am
United States of Conner wrote:I dont know how to convince some people that I would rather go sit in a nice little café than go to church. It doesn't seem complex.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Immoren » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:49 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Jochistan » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:49 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:The Grim Reaper wrote:The Bible has a patent on Jesus Christ.
Just the other day, they sent me a DCMA take-down notice regarding "your belief system". So now I'm a Wiccan.
It's really quite tragic. I was told that the TPP will be extending the Bible's power to Muslims, unless the Koran can mount a successful legal defense.
The Islam will be devastated, because you do not have a Quran without Jesus. There was only so much they could write about the 'prophet' Mohammed without making certain without a doubt that he was nothing more than a highly efficient warlord with a predilection for mass murder and delusions of the divine.
by The Lacedaemonians » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:50 am
Jochistan wrote:It depends what Hadith you're going by.
Not really seeing how much he ensured religious pluralism and lack of civilian casualties. Its also pretty suspicious since, for centuries, resentful communities of Pagans, Radical Jewish sects and Heterodox Ghulat actively spread rumours and lies about Muhammad. Some of wiich, ironically made it into later Hadith.
Also, Conquerers like Mu'awiyah and Yazid tried to use fabricated hadith to justify their actions. And there were infinite opportunities to make such hadith.
by Jochistan » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:51 am
Hurdegaryp wrote:The Grim Reaper wrote:The Bible has a patent on Jesus Christ.
Just the other day, they sent me a DCMA take-down notice regarding "your belief system". So now I'm a Wiccan.
It's really quite tragic. I was told that the TPP will be extending the Bible's power to Muslims, unless the Koran can mount a successful legal defense.
The Islam will be devastated, because you do not have a Quran without Jesus. There was only so much they could write about the 'prophet' Mohammed without making certain without a doubt that he was nothing more than a highly efficient warlord with a predilection for mass murder and delusions of the divine. Hence why the teachings of Jesus were recycled by the people who compiled and edited the Quran in the first few decades after the Arabs successfully stumbled into creating an Islamic empire.
by Gallade » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:54 am
by Dyakovo » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:55 am
United States of Conner wrote:I dont know how to convince some people that I would rather go sit in a nice little café than go to church. It doesn't seem complex.
by Jochistan » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:55 am
The Lacedaemonians wrote:Jochistan wrote:It depends what Hadith you're going by.
Not really seeing how much he ensured religious pluralism and lack of civilian casualties. Its also pretty suspicious since, for centuries, resentful communities of Pagans, Radical Jewish sects and Heterodox Ghulat actively spread rumours and lies about Muhammad. Some of wiich, ironically made it into later Hadith.
Also, Conquerers like Mu'awiyah and Yazid tried to use fabricated hadith to justify their actions. And there were infinite opportunities to make such hadith.
So which of the Hadith are considered valid and by what criteria are they measured?
by The Lacedaemonians » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:55 am
Gallade wrote:It works for pubs called "The Office", at any rate.
by Dyakovo » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:57 am
The Lacedaemonians wrote:Jochistan wrote:It depends what Hadith you're going by.
Not really seeing how much he ensured religious pluralism and lack of civilian casualties. Its also pretty suspicious since, for centuries, resentful communities of Pagans, Radical Jewish sects and Heterodox Ghulat actively spread rumours and lies about Muhammad. Some of wiich, ironically made it into later Hadith.
Also, Conquerers like Mu'awiyah and Yazid tried to use fabricated hadith to justify their actions. And there were infinite opportunities to make such hadith.
So which of the Hadith are considered valid and by what criteria are they measured?
by Gallade » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:57 am
by Jochistan » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:57 am
by The Lacedaemonians » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:59 am
by Jochistan » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:59 am
by Immoren » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:01 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Ethel mermania » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:02 am
by United States of Conner » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:05 am
by Dyakovo » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:07 am
by Hurdegaryp » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:10 am
Jochistan wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:The Islam will be devastated, because you do not have a Quran without Jesus. There was only so much they could write about the 'prophet' Mohammed without making certain without a doubt that he was nothing more than a highly efficient warlord with a predilection for mass murder and delusions of the divine. Hence why the teachings of Jesus were recycled by the people who compiled and edited the Quran in the first few decades after the Arabs successfully stumbled into creating an Islamic empire.
Stumbled? Oh, but they succeeded.
And yeah, Jesus is seen as a Prophet, so yes, his teachings were expanded upon.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Immoren » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:12 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there
by Ethel mermania » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:14 am
by Hurdegaryp » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:18 am
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by United States of Conner » Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:29 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A m e n r i a, Dimetrodon Empire, Dowaesk, Elejamie, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, HISPIDA, Inner Albania, La Xinga, The Jamesian Republic, Unmet Player
Advertisement