Sin for pretty much every suffering in this world.
Advertisement
by The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Sat Nov 14, 2015 3:58 pm
by The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Sat Nov 14, 2015 3:59 pm
by The Alexanderians » Sat Nov 14, 2015 4:08 pm
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
by Diopolis » Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:47 pm
by Luminesa » Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:24 pm
by Luminesa » Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:38 pm
by Grand Calvert » Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:46 pm
by Nordengrund » Sat Nov 14, 2015 8:10 pm
by Grand Calvert » Sat Nov 14, 2015 8:33 pm
Nordengrund wrote:I am reading through 2 Peter and in the second chapter is talking about false prophets. It says the will secretly introduce heresies, even denying the One who "bought" them.
I was raised to believe you cannot lose your salvation, yet the verse is saying the Master bought the false prophets. I think that "bought" means that God has claimed them as his own, yet they will be destroyed. Does this verse refute the concept that salvation cannot be lost?
This question is mainly targeted at my Reformed friends.
by The Hobbesian Metaphysician » Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:15 pm
by Constantinopolis » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:05 pm
by The Alexanderians » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:26 pm
Constantinopolis wrote:The Hobbesian Metaphysician wrote:Trying to claim concubinage is adultery is rather a stretch.
Well, I'm not sure about the Old Law of Judaism, but in the New Covenant of Christianity, concubinage is definitely adultery. A wife has no authority to give her husband "permission" to have sex with someone else. And, likewise, a husband has no authority to give his wife "permission" to have sex with someone else.
Just like Christ could not give His Church "permission" to worship other gods.
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
by Constantinopolis » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:00 pm
The Alexanderians wrote:Constantinopolis wrote:Well, I'm not sure about the Old Law of Judaism, but in the New Covenant of Christianity, concubinage is definitely adultery. A wife has no authority to give her husband "permission" to have sex with someone else. And, likewise, a husband has no authority to give his wife "permission" to have sex with someone else.
Just like Christ could not give His Church "permission" to worship other gods.
So open relationships
by Luminesa » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:03 pm
by The Alexanderians » Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:05 pm
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
by Menassa » Sun Nov 15, 2015 11:10 am
Constantinopolis wrote:The Hobbesian Metaphysician wrote:Trying to claim concubinage is adultery is rather a stretch.
Well, I'm not sure about the Old Law of Judaism, but in the New Covenant of Christianity, concubinage is definitely adultery. A wife has no authority to give her husband "permission" to have sex with someone else. And, likewise, a husband has no authority to give his wife "permission" to have sex with someone else.
Just like Christ could not give His Church "permission" to worship other gods.
by Diopolis » Sun Nov 15, 2015 11:29 am
by Menassa » Sun Nov 15, 2015 11:40 am
Diopolis wrote:The Hobbesian Metaphysician wrote:Trying to claim concubinage is adultery is rather a stretch. I mean at most Diopolis is correct they didn't trust God, but given how old Abraham wife's was it is understandable why they were questioning of this.
Yes, but we're talking about a man who was willing to sacrifice his son on God's command- my point is, he clearly knew better than to doubt God.
by Tarsonis Survivors » Sun Nov 15, 2015 12:41 pm
by Menassa » Sun Nov 15, 2015 12:51 pm
Tarsonis Survivors wrote:King David has 13 wives and concubines and was still counted as righteous.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aadhiris, Cavirfi, El Lazaro, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Ineva, New Temecula, Nu Elysium, Port Carverton, Quiri, Rusrunia, Saiwana, Statesburg, Tesseris, The Vooperian Union
Advertisement