Atheists why do you all hate Christians?

[Resolute Prime]

your reasons for hating christians are BS due to the fact that not all christians do those things.

Many² do and they make others who will do such things. The only way to stop this is to wipe out all religion of any sort.³

1) Fixed your quote to show who actually wrote what you're responding to.
2) Not "many" "some"
3) So you're one of those that ignorantly believes that religion only fosters evil Wiping out all religion is both not possible and not desirable.

I beg to differ.

There is a way to end religion, world hunger, poverty and wars at the same time.
These devices are called thermonuclear warheads (or nukes). If sufficient numbers of these were to be detonated with inter meshing blast throughout the world, there is a 90% chance of all of the world's problems being solved.

Its still undesirable though.

Fine...
Short of wiping out all of humanity it is not possible to wipe out religion.

I feel I have to point out - in the event of nuclear extermination of the whole human species... cockroaches may well survive, and we don't know much about their religious leanings.

It's entirely possible that religion could survive the destruction of humans.

contrary to common belief, cockroaches cannot survive the nuclear blast, but can survive the radioactive fallout due to having significantly less cells. In any case, the detonation of sufficient nuclear weapons should destroy enough of the biosphere that all life will be extinguished eventually. (ash will be hurled to the upper atmosphere, thus blocking sun light, which kills all the plants and therefore the rest of the animals, who would not have anything to eat.)

[Dyakovo]

Your whole counterargument is rubbish. There is no counterargument, you're just trying to incite a flamewar. Go back to church.

How about you read the thread you're posting in? I'm an atheist. I just can't stand ignorant bigots regardless of whether they are theists or atheists.

[Caligaria Draconis]

your reasons for hating christians are BS due to the fact that not all christians do those things.

Many² do and they make others who will do such things. The only way to stop this is to wipe out all religion of any sort.³

1) Fixed your quote to show who actually wrote what you're responding to.
2) Not "many" "some"
3) So you're one of those that ignorantly believes that religion only fosters evil Wiping out all religion is both not possible and not desirable.

I beg to differ.

There is a way to end religion, world hunger, poverty and wars at the same time.
These devices are called thermonuclear warheads (or nukes). If sufficient numbers of these were to be detonated with inter meshing blast throughout the world, there is a 90% chance of all of the world's problems being solved.

Its still undesirable though.

Fine...
Short of wiping out all of humanity it is not possible to wipe out religion.

I feel I have to point out - in the event of nuclear extermination of the whole human species... cockroaches may well survive, and we don't know much about their religious leanings.

It's entirely possible that religion could survive the destruction of humans.

contrary to common belief, cockroaches cannot survive the nuclear blast, but can survive the radioactive fallout due to having significantly less cells. In any case, the detonation of sufficient nuclear weapons should destroy enough of the biosphere that all life will be extinguished eventually. (ash will be hurled to the upper atmosphere, thus blocking sun light, which kills all the plants and therefore the rest of the animals, who would not have anything to eat.)

Veering off topic, cockroaches cannot even survive the fallout, rats are better off, not because they can survive the radiation, but because they're relatively well shielded in their many habitats.

[Resolute Prime]

Also: So I make this absolutely clear: the nuke solution was intended a joke.

I will now go back on topic.

[Caligaria Draconis]

Your whole counterargument is rubbish. There is no counterargument, you're just trying to incite a flamewar. Go back to church.

How about you read the thread you're posting in? I'm an atheist. I just can't stand ignorant bigots regardless of whether they are theists or atheists.

I know you're claiming to be an atheist, bur right now, no matter what of your religious beliefs, it seems you only read half of the post, or half a phrase, and answer to that, or produce counterarguments that aren't either feasible or have no meaning whatsoever.

Right now, you're just trying the hardest you can to incite a flamewar. Crawl back to your hole.

[Dyakovo]

Your whole counterargument is rubbish. There is no counterargument, you're just trying to incite a flamewar. Go back to church.

How about you read the thread you're posting in? I'm an atheist. I just can't stand ignorant bigots regardless of whether they are theists or atheists.

I know you're claiming to be an atheist, bur right now, no matter what of your religious beliefs, it seems you only read half of the post, or half a phrase, and answer to that, or produce counterarguments that aren't either feasible or have no meaning whatsoever.

Right now, you're just trying the hardest you can to incite a flamewar. Crawl back to your hole.

Not claiming to be, I am one. I'm just not an intolerant bigot. Also, I'll offer you the same advice I gave out earlier, learn how to spell.

[Seperates]

Alright... I'll admit it and come clean. I just make fun of religions because I'm jealous of them. I mean... How could I not be jealous of a man in a white robe with a ring of light around his head?

And yet the message he preached is so screwed up... I mean... Love everybody despite their religious, social, and ethnic background? That man must have been on some gooooood shit right there. /sarcastic rant

I dislike most Christians because they don't follow Christ. I doubt that Christ, if/when he comes back, will even recognize his own faith. It has been screwed up so much that I don't even get the "God is with me feeling" in mass that I get when I'm hanging out with people who are accepting to differences, be they Muslim, Hindu, or Christian.

[Albia land of norns]

Also: So I make this absolutely clear: the nuke solution was intended a joke.

Nevertheless it would work.

[Resolute Prime]

Also: So I make this absolutely clear: the nuke solution was intended a joke.

Nevertheless it would work.

Nukes makes everything better.

[Caligaria Draconis]

Your whole counterargument is rubbish. There is no counterargument, you're just trying to incite a flamewar. Go back to church.

How about you read the thread you're posting in? I'm an atheist. I just can't stand ignorant bigots regardless of whether they are theists or atheists.

I know you're claiming to be an atheist, bur right now, no matter what of your religious beliefs, it seems you only read half of the post, or half a phrase, and answer to that, or produce counterarguments that aren't either feasible or have no meaning whatsoever.

Right now, you're just trying the hardest you can to incite a flamewar. Crawl back to your hole.

Not claiming to be, I am one1. I'm just not an intolerant bigot. 2 Also, I'll offer you the same advice I gave out earlier3, learn how to spell. 4

Learn how to remember things you have done within the last hour, you did not give me any advice or pointless critique on my spelling. However, typos do not count as spelling errors, it just so happens to be that "R" is next to "T".

In addition, since you bring this up and really really want to nitpick, here, have some red markers.

1 : Subject not clear, use definition markers. [Atheist], or better yet, since you're not quoting anyone directly, state that you are an atheist.

2 : Sentence construction lacking. You are "speaking" in short phrases. This is not natural. Not to be condoned. You sound like a voice synth. Stop doing this. In addition; statement incorrect.

3 : "I" appearing twice in short timespan within the same sentence is not condoned or necessary, grammatically speaking. Find a better sentence structure... for instance "I will repeat the advice given earlier". There is no need to double-state it is by you.

4 : As mentioned above, a mistaken buttonpress, commonly referred to as "a typo", does not make a spelling mistake. It is simply a mistake.


So how's that spellchecker working out for you? Will you next find out that i will not capitalize "i"? Will this make you feel better of yourself, or will it perhaps make you a better person?

Find out in the next exciting episode of "Internet Arguments Gone Wild"

[Dyakovo]

Your whole counterargument is rubbish. There is no counterargument, you're just trying to incite a flamewar. Go back to church.

How about you read the thread you're posting in? I'm an atheist. I just can't stand ignorant bigots regardless of whether they are theists or atheists.

I know you're claiming to be an atheist, bur right now, no matter what of your religious beliefs, it seems you only read half of the post, or half a phrase, and answer to that, or produce counterarguments that aren't either feasible or have no meaning whatsoever.

Right now, you're just trying the hardest you can to incite a flamewar. Crawl back to your hole.

Not claiming to be, I am one1. I'm just not an intolerant bigot. 2 Also, I'll offer you the same advice I gave out earlier3, learn how to spell. 4

Learn how to remember things you have done within the last hour, you did not give me any advice or pointless critique on my spelling. However, typos do not count as spelling errors, it just so happens to be that "R" is next to "T".

In addition, since you bring this up and really really want to nitpick, here, have some red markers.

1 : Subject not clear, use definition markers. [Atheist], or better yet, since you're not quoting anyone directly, state that you are an atheist.

2 : Sentence construction lacking. You are "speaking" in short phrases. This is not natural. Not to be condoned. You sound like a voice synth. Stop doing this. In addition; statement incorrect.

3 : "I" appearing twice in short timespan within the same sentence is not condoned or necessary, grammatically speaking. Find a better sentence structure, for instance "I will repeat the advice given earlier". There is no need to double-state it is by you.

4 : As mentioned above, a mistaken buttonpress, commonly referred to as "a typo", does not make a spelling mistake. It is simply a mistake.


So how's that spellchecker working out for you? Will you next find out that i will not capitalize "i"? Will this make you feel better of yourself, or will it perhaps make you a better person?

Find out in the next exciting episode of "Internet Arguments Gone Wild"

lol
Please, elaborate on how it is that I am an intolerant bigot...

[Caligaria Draconis]

Your whole counterargument is rubbish. There is no counterargument, you're just trying to incite a flamewar. Go back to church.

How about you read the thread you're posting in? I'm an atheist. I just can't stand ignorant bigots regardless of whether they are theists or atheists.

I know you're claiming to be an atheist, bur right now, no matter what of your religious beliefs, it seems you only read half of the post, or half a phrase, and answer to that, or produce counterarguments that aren't either feasible or have no meaning whatsoever.

Right now, you're just trying the hardest you can to incite a flamewar. Crawl back to your hole.

Not claiming to be, I am one1. I'm just not an intolerant bigot. 2 Also, I'll offer you the same advice I gave out earlier3, learn how to spell. 4

Learn how to remember things you have done within the last hour, you did not give me any advice or pointless critique on my spelling. However, typos do not count as spelling errors, it just so happens to be that "R" is next to "T".

In addition, since you bring this up and really really want to nitpick, here, have some red markers.

1 : Subject not clear, use definition markers. [Atheist], or better yet, since you're not quoting anyone directly, state that you are an atheist.

2 : Sentence construction lacking. You are "speaking" in short phrases. This is not natural. Not to be condoned. You sound like a voice synth. Stop doing this. In addition; statement incorrect.

3 : "I" appearing twice in short timespan within the same sentence is not condoned or necessary, grammatically speaking. Find a better sentence structure, for instance "I will repeat the advice given earlier". There is no need to double-state it is by you.

4 : As mentioned above, a mistaken buttonpress, commonly referred to as "a typo", does not make a spelling mistake. It is simply a mistake.


So how's that spellchecker working out for you? Will you next find out that i will not capitalize "i"? Will this make you feel better of yourself, or will it perhaps make you a better person?

Find out in the next exciting episode of "Internet Arguments Gone Wild"

lol
Please, elaborate on how it is that I am an intolerant bigot...

That is simply easy. Read the last 20 posts you made and imagine they were by someone who is not you. Tadah! You have found an intolerant bigot. One of your intolyrances is fuond in bad speeling. Et siims 2 somehowe insite raeg within you ven you sii this kind of stuf.


"Statement incorrect" is a joke, but it still is grammatically correct, so long it is not it's own sentence. In this instance, it is a portion of a phrase following a semicolon, which curiously is one of the few usages of semicolon, however not very common nowadays. If i had used "Statement is incorrect", i would've broken the reprimanding tone of the entire paragraph, it was also wordplay on the whole ''synthetisized'' portion of your writing style in the previous post, as in "Statement incorrect" is something a robot would say.

[Grave_n_idle]

Your whole counterargument is rubbish. There is no counterargument, you're just trying to incite a flamewar. Go back to church.

How about you read the thread you're posting in? I'm an atheist. I just can't stand ignorant bigots regardless of whether they are theists or atheists.

I know you're claiming to be an atheist, bur right now, no matter what of your religious beliefs, it seems you only read half of the post, or half a phrase, and answer to that, or produce counterarguments that aren't either feasible or have no meaning whatsoever.

Right now, you're just trying the hardest you can to incite a flamewar. Crawl back to your hole.

Not claiming to be, I am one1. I'm just not an intolerant bigot. 2 Also, I'll offer you the same advice I gave out earlier3, learn how to spell. 4

Learn how to remember things you have done within the last hour, you did not give me any advice or pointless critique on my spelling. However, typos do not count as spelling errors, it just so happens to be that "R" is next to "T".

In addition, since you bring this up and really really want to nitpick, here, have some red markers.

1 : Subject not clear, use definition markers. [Atheist], or better yet, since you're not quoting anyone directly, state that you are an atheist.

2 : Sentence construction lacking. You are "speaking" in short phrases. This is not natural. Not to be condoned. You sound like a voice synth. Stop doing this. In addition; statement incorrect.

3 : "I" appearing twice in short timespan within the same sentence is not condoned or necessary, grammatically speaking. Find a better sentence structure, for instance "I will repeat the advice given earlier". There is no need to double-state it is by you.

4 : As mentioned above, a mistaken buttonpress, commonly referred to as "a typo", does not make a spelling mistake. It is simply a mistake.


So how's that spellchecker working out for you? Will you next find out that i will not capitalize "i"? Will this make you feel better of yourself, or will it perhaps make you a better person?

Find out in the next exciting episode of "Internet Arguments Gone Wild"

lol
Please, elaborate on how it is that I am an intolerant bigot...

That is simply easy. Read the last 20 posts you made and imagine they were by someone who is not you. Tadah! You have found an intolerant bigot. One of your intolyrances is fuond in bad speeling. Et siims 2 somehowe insite raeg within you ven you sii this kind of stuf.

I'm not seeing it...

...how is telling people that their universal generalisations are a bad thing, because they (obviously) don't hold true on examination of individual cases... 'intolerant bigotry'?

[Dyakovo]

lol
Please, elaborate on how it is that I am an intolerant bigot...

That is simply easy. Read the last 20 posts you made and imagine they were by someone who is not you. Tadah! You have found an intolerant bigot. One of your intolyrances is fuond in bad speeling. Et siims 2 somehowe insite raeg within you ven you sii this kind of stuf.

Ah, so you don't even know what a bigot is...
Pointing out spelling errors is not bigotry.
I'll give you a hand here:

bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

[Dyakovo]

I'm not seeing it...

...how is telling people that their universal generalisations are a bad thing, because they (obviously) don't hold true on examination of individual cases... 'intolerant bigotry'?

Well, I pointed out some spelling errors, so obviously I'm a bigot...


Wait, no, that's not right. It shows that I am an occasional spelling nazi...

[Caligaria Draconis]

lol
Please, elaborate on how it is that I am an intolerant bigot...

That is simply easy. Read the last 20 posts you made and imagine they were by someone who is not you. Tadah! You have found an intolerant bigot. One of your intolyrances is fuond in bad speeling. Et siims 2 somehowe insite raeg within you ven you sii this kind of stuf.

Ah, so you don't even know what a bigot is...
Pointing out spelling errors is not bigotry.
I'll give you a hand here:

bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

" bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; "
You honestly claim this is not in complete and utter way you? Surely you jest, good sire. You see, sire, "bigotry" is not limited in any way to an ethnic or religious group, no, it is of any group of people.

Let us, forsooth, give an example. You are a bigot for you view people who do not re-read their posts several times in a row, to check the tiniest spelling errors. These people, you view as somehow lower beings, and consider their arguments moot due to a completely superficial flaw, therefore, you are a bigot. Good day sire, it is teatime.

[Blouman Empire]

Only if you can come up with something that is true of all christians.

Before posting giberish read hystory to find out the simply evil things that have been done due to your creationisam.

Would that mean creationism is real?

After all if I can find out the things it has done that means it has to be true, right?

[Dyakovo]

lol
Please, elaborate on how it is that I am an intolerant bigot...

That is simply easy. Read the last 20 posts you made and imagine they were by someone who is not you. Tadah! You have found an intolerant bigot. One of your intolyrances is fuond in bad speeling. Et siims 2 somehowe insite raeg within you ven you sii this kind of stuf.

Ah, so you don't even know what a bigot is...
Pointing out spelling errors is not bigotry.
I'll give you a hand here:

bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

" bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; "
You honestly claim this is not in complete and utter way you? Surely you jest, good sire. You see, sire, "bigotry" is not limited in any way to an ethnic or religious group, no, it is of any group of people.

Let us, forsooth, give an example. You are a bigot for you view people who do not re-read their posts several times in a row, to check the tiniest spelling errors. These people, you view as somehow lower beings, and consider their arguments moot due to a completely superficial flaw, therefore, you are a bigot. Good day sire, it is teatime.

Even with the definition in front of you, and evidence provided that you at least took a cursory glance at it, you still don't know what the word means.

[Arresyl]

lol
Please, elaborate on how it is that I am an intolerant bigot...

That is simply easy. Read the last 20 posts you made and imagine they were by someone who is not you. Tadah! You have found an intolerant bigot. One of your intolyrances is fuond in bad speeling. Et siims 2 somehowe insite raeg within you ven you sii this kind of stuf.

Ah, so you don't even know what a bigot is...
Pointing out spelling errors is not bigotry.
I'll give you a hand here:

bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

" bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; "
You honestly claim this is not in complete and utter way you? Surely you jest, good sire. You see, sire, "bigotry" is not limited in any way to an ethnic or religious group, no, it is of any group of people.

Let us, forsooth, give an example. You are a bigot for you view people who do not re-read their posts several times in a row, to check the tiniest spelling errors. These people, you view as somehow lower beings, and consider their arguments moot due to a completely superficial flaw, therefore, you are a bigot. Good day sire, it is teatime.

I'm not entirely sure if this counts as "completely insane," or not. It's entirely incorrect, as he just dislikes typos/bad spelling, not all people who make spelling errors/typos.

[Pinnopia]

your reasons for hating christians are BS due to the fact that not all christians do those things.

Many do and they make others who will do such things. The only way to stop this is to wipe out all religion of any sort.

I don't think I wrote that. In fact, I'm sure of it! How the hell did you do that?

But I agree with you. I am not a fan of any religion. All it does is create conflict and chaos.

[Dyakovo]

your reasons for hating christians are BS due to the fact that not all christians do those things.

Many do and they make others who will do such things. The only way to stop this is to wipe out all religion of any sort.

I don't think I wrote that. In fact, I'm sure of it! How the hell did you do that?

He quoted your response to my saying it and then did an abysmal job in cutting out your portion.

[Arresyl]

Only if you can come up with something that is true of all christians.

Before posting giberish read hystory to find out the simply evil things that have been done due to your creationisam.

Would that mean creationism is real?

After all if I can find out the things it has done that means it has to be true, right?

Well, creationism is a real idea...

[Blouman Empire]

Because I was the victim of an Elementary school version of a Christian lynch mob when I was in 5th grade because I was an Atheist. I was beaten daily because I was not give in and claim my faith to Christianity. This didnt happen in a little town or county in the south but in a middle class New England town. Yes I hate Christianity and all religions. I look on religion like the way a parent of a child would look upon a sex offender with fear, anger and utter disgust.

So because a few kids bullied you that means you should hate everyone like them?

Just like happened to me. It's logical to hate anyone who beats you.

Yes the people not everyone who may have an association with it.

By your logic I should hate you because people who you have never met and probably never will beat me up cause I went to church and during school went across to the Catholic school for confirmation lessons as I was a "God-boy"

[Dyakovo]

Because I was the victim of an Elementary school version of a Christian lynch mob when I was in 5th grade because I was an Atheist. I was beaten daily because I was not give in and claim my faith to Christianity. This didnt happen in a little town or county in the south but in a middle class New England town. Yes I hate Christianity and all religions. I look on religion like the way a parent of a child would look upon a sex offender with fear, anger and utter disgust.

So because a few kids bullied you that means you should hate everyone like them?

Just like happened to me. It's logical to hate anyone who beats you.

Yes the people not everyone who may have an association with it.

By your logic I should hate you because people who you have never met and probably never will beat me up cause I went to church and during school went across to the Catholic school for confirmation lessons as I was a "God-boy"

*beats up BE*

No, no, you've got it all wrong. It's only logical if it is used as an excuse to hate theists.

[Pinnopia]

your reasons for hating christians are BS due to the fact that not all christians do those things.

Many do and they make others who will do such things. The only way to stop this is to wipe out all religion of any sort.

I don't think I wrote that. In fact, I'm sure of it! How the hell did you do that?

He quoted your response to my saying it and then did an abysmal job in cutting out your portion.

Well, that's annoying.