Ethel mermania wrote:It has? To me countless times?
I'm sorry, what? I never said it was explained to you specifically, only that it WAS explained.
Ethel mermania wrote:Reading is fundimental, try it some time.
I agree that you should actually read and not use a childish excuse of, "Well, I'll just not read through the thread and correct myself before I make a silly mistake of posting something that not only isn't true, but has been repeatedly demonstrated to not be true in this very thread" in order to justify being wrong as though it's anyone else's fault other than your own.





