NationStates

Liriena wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
Yet another spectacular failure to read the OP and a reliance on biological essentialism.

Also, what's with this obsession with trans women's penises? I'm violently pansexual, and even I don't spend that much time thinking about other people's genitals.

Because people have it in their heads that whatever hardware you shipped with should dictate your entire life, regardless of what the software actually says.

Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:

Harisistan wrote:well, he has a dude, so he's a dick.

Huhh what? There's a dude stapled between her legs? How'd he get there?!

dude, he has a well, he's so dick a

Harisistan wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
Yet another spectacular failure to read the OP and a reliance on biological essentialism.

well, he has a dude, so he's a dick.

What if it's a trans man called Richard?

Liriena wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
Yet another spectacular failure to read the OP and a reliance on biological essentialism.

Also, what's with this obsession with trans women's penises? I'm violently pansexual, and even I don't spend that much time thinking about other people's genitals.

Teehee~ One would suggest that the obsession with penises is excessive among the strong oppressors of LGBTQ+ rights... Almost... As if they are... Addicted... To penises...

Harisistan wrote:well, he has a dick, so he's a dude.

Heresy

Harisistan wrote:

Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
Huhh what? There's a dude stapled between her legs? How'd he get there?!

dude, he has a well, he's so dick a

You do realise that deliberate misgendering is against the rules, I hope...

Val Halla wrote:

Harisistan wrote:well, he has a dude, so he's a dick.

What if it's a trans man called Richard?

Liriena wrote:Also, what's with this obsession with trans women's penises? I'm violently pansexual, and even I don't spend that much time thinking about other people's genitals.

Teehee~ One would suggest that the obsession with penises is excessive among the strong oppressors of LGBTQ+ rights... Almost... As if they are... Addicted... To penises...

I have nothing against gay, lesbians or bisexuals. Just trans people. I don't understand how you can feel like you're not what you are.

Val Halla wrote:

Harisistan wrote:well, he has a dude, so he's a dick.

What if it's a trans man called Richard?

Liriena wrote:Also, what's with this obsession with trans women's penises? I'm violently pansexual, and even I don't spend that much time thinking about other people's genitals.

Teehee~ One would suggest that the obsession with penises is excessive among the strong oppressors of LGBTQ+ rights... Almost... As if they are... Addicted... To penises...

*insert spiel about vocal homophobia being an indicator for closet homosexuality here*

Harisistan wrote:

Val Halla wrote:What if it's a trans man called Richard?


Teehee~ One would suggest that the obsession with penises is excessive among the strong oppressors of LGBTQ+ rights... Almost... As if they are... Addicted... To penises...

I have nothing against gay, lesbians or bisexuals. Just trans people. I don't understand how you can feel like you're not what you are.

Simple. I am a woman. I don't "feel" like one.

Liriena wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
Yet another spectacular failure to read the OP and a reliance on biological essentialism.

Also, what's with this obsession with trans women's penises? I'm violently pansexual, and even I don't spend that much time thinking about other people's genitals.

Penises are inherently funny, but I don't think that's it, somehow.

Val Halla wrote:

Harisistan wrote:dude, he has a well, he's so dick a

You do realise that deliberate misgendering is against the rules, I hope...

it's like tumblr 2.0... except less suicidal teenagers... and crazy otherkins and headmates.

Harisistan wrote:

Val Halla wrote:What if it's a trans man called Richard?


Teehee~ One would suggest that the obsession with penises is excessive among the strong oppressors of LGBTQ+ rights... Almost... As if they are... Addicted... To penises...

I have nothing against gay, lesbians or bisexuals. Just trans people. I don't understand how you can feel like you're not what you are.

No no no. I don't look like what I am.

Harisistan wrote:

Val Halla wrote:You do realise that deliberate misgendering is against the rules, I hope...

it's like tumblr 2.0... except less suicidal teenagers... and crazy otherkins and headmates.

Personally I am disappointed by NSG's lack of furry porn.

Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:

Harisistan wrote:I have nothing against gay, lesbians or bisexuals. Just trans people. I don't understand how you can feel like you're not what you are.

Simple. I am a woman. I don't "feel" like one.

*Feels* You feel like one to me though

Harisistan wrote:

Val Halla wrote:You do realise that deliberate misgendering is against the rules, I hope...

it's like tumblr 2.0... except less suicidal teenagers... and crazy otherkins and headmates.

So being expected to treat other users as human beings makes us a tumblr clone?

Ifreann wrote:Penises are inherently funny, but I don't think that's it, somehow.

It's true. Penises are inherently funny.




I showed mine to a girl last week, she couldn't stop laughing

Liriena wrote:

Mairland wrote:I am not a transphobic.

It is called orderly government.

And exactly what purpose does the government being so unflinchingly orderly serve here? Who benefits from having someone who medical professionals consider a woman in an all-male prison?

HM Prison Service clearly did not have the time or authority to redo all of the woman's papers to make her actually be a woman in the eyes of the law (passport, etc).

The Blaatschapen wrote:

Ifreann wrote:Penises are inherently funny, but I don't think that's it, somehow.

It's true. Penises are inherently funny.




I showed mine to a girl last week, she couldn't stop laughing

And who can blame her?

Faehig wrote:I thought the real problem was making distinctions between gender in the first place. End the fascistic practice of all-male prisons!

This is the worst idea I have ever read.

TERF wrote:

Faehig wrote:I thought the real problem was making distinctions between gender in the first place. End the fascistic practice of all-male prisons!

This is the worst idea I have ever read.

I'm pretty sure it was sarcasm.

It is right please tell me it's not

TERF wrote:

Faehig wrote:I thought the real problem was making distinctions between gender in the first place. End the fascistic practice of all-male prisons!

This is the worst idea I have ever read.

I thought feminists were in favour of ending gender-based treatment though.

Vassenor wrote:

TERF wrote:
This is the worst idea I have ever read.

I thought feminists were in favour of ending gender-based treatment though.

I'm even against unisex bathrooms, where the vast majority of men wouldn't be criminals, why the hell I should approve an unisex prison where women would be together with men that are ALL criminals???

Liriena wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
Yet another spectacular failure to read the OP and a reliance on biological essentialism.

Also, what's with this obsession with trans women's penises? I'm violently pansexual, and even I don't spend that much time thinking about other people's genitals.

Instead choosing to spend your time fantasizing over kitchenware?

On a more serious note, is it really that much of a hassle to recognise that this is a problem and handle the necessary paperwork? >.>

Harisistan wrote:

Val Halla wrote:What if it's a trans man called Richard?


Teehee~ One would suggest that the obsession with penises is excessive among the strong oppressors of LGBTQ+ rights... Almost... As if they are... Addicted... To penises...

I have nothing against gay, lesbians or bisexuals. Just trans people. I don't understand how you can feel like you're not what you are.

I occasionally get the same feeling with regards to homosexuality, but it doesn't affect my stance on the issue because I recognize the irrationality of that feeling and shove it off to the side.

TERF wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
I thought feminists were in favour of ending gender-based treatment though.

I'm even against unisex bathrooms, where the vast majority of men wouldn't be criminals, why the hell I should approve an unisex prison where women would be together with men that are ALL criminals???

The women would be criminals too.
>inb4 women can't commit crime

TERF wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
I thought feminists were in favour of ending gender-based treatment though.

I'm even against unisex bathrooms, where the vast majority of men wouldn't be criminals, why the hell I should approve an unisex prison where women would be together with men that are ALL criminals???

Where else should women who are criminals be? Unisex bathrooms?

TERF wrote:

Vassenor wrote:
I thought feminists were in favour of ending gender-based treatment though.

I'm even against unisex bathrooms, where the vast majority of men wouldn't be criminals, why the hell I should approve an unisex prison where women would be together with men that are ALL criminals???

The women are criminals too.