NATION

PASSWORD

The NationStates Feminist Thread II

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Nov 22, 2016 2:59 pm

Wallenburg wrote:I want to make it clear that my post criticizes that sort of behavior in general, rather than specific people. Naming names would not only be borderline flaming/baiting, but also extremely detracting to my actual point.


And as an added bonus you haven't personally accused anybody of anything and they won't be inspired to challenge you to substantiate your bare accusation. I haven't seen a single person go "lol fuckin sjw u h8 men go back to your safe space."
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
New Edom
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23241
Founded: Mar 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Edom » Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:54 pm

Giovenith wrote:
The United Providences of Perland wrote:Feminism in theory, is a great thing. And when it was created, it was certainly needed. But now, (and read my entire post here as this may offend a few people if not read correctly), it's filled with people who have idiotic and down right hypocritical ideologies (like all men are always out to hurt woman, or that woman are the master race, and so on). A decent amount of feminists, are not like this. But the idiotic minority is drowning out the good intentioned majority. Plus, feminism has frankly done its purpose. There is, frankly, not that much sexism but in small clusters. Sure, there is some. But for a great majority, there isn't, which is good. And realistically, all sexism, racism, and so on will never be gone.


I don't think feminism has entirely done it's purpose, there is the third world and even some instances in the first world, but feminism has definitely failed to adapt in light of changes to Western society. Instead of focusing on gender equality as it actually manifests itself, they attempt to use vague, unproven social hypotheses to spook it's followers into believing that our society is the same as it was 80 years ago.


And hey Jello, I replied to your SAGE thing last page. Sorry it took long, I missed it.


People have a lot invested in being right about the mainstream expressions of feminism. They're actually making careers, making money off it. Whether it's Emma Watson now making a stupid feminist remake of "Beauty and the Beast--because you know old folktales need to be remade to be politically correct or young women will kill themselves--or Gender Studies professors having a job--they NEED tihs. Like Meghan Murphy at Feministcurrent--arguably Canada's most influential feminist online publication--her degree is in Gender Studies.

Being a rpofessional feminist is like being a sniper or deep sea diver--it's a little challenging to just turn that into another profession. So these people will fight tooth and nail to be relevant. Imagine being Gloria Steinem--it must be like being a professional horse wagon manufacturer in the 1920s. You know your job is doomed, but you're still alive, and you're old. It's all damage control.
"The three articles of Civil Service faith: it takes longer to do things quickly, it's far more expensive to do things cheaply, and it's more democratic to do things in secret." - Jim Hacker "Yes Minister"

User avatar
Rastynhaven
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1748
Founded: Oct 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Rastynhaven » Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:53 pm

New Edom wrote:
Giovenith wrote:
I don't think feminism has entirely done it's purpose, there is the third world and even some instances in the first world, but feminism has definitely failed to adapt in light of changes to Western society. Instead of focusing on gender equality as it actually manifests itself, they attempt to use vague, unproven social hypotheses to spook it's followers into believing that our society is the same as it was 80 years ago.


And hey Jello, I replied to your SAGE thing last page. Sorry it took long, I missed it.


Whether it's Emma Watson now making a stupid feminist remake of "Beauty and the Beast--because you know old folktales need to be remade to be politically correct or young women will kill themselves--


How is it stupid? There's nothing wrong with adapting a fairytale to be more appealing to modern audiences and modern children. No one will portray the rape of Sleeping Beauty by the prince, for example, which was one of the earliest written versions. An extreme example, but 1930s Snow White wouldn't fly today either. You can do much with source material, just look at how Tangled diverges from the original story, but is still recognizably Rapunzel. Barbie came out with an adventurous Rapunzel a decade earlier. The fact is that too-passive heroines aren't appealing anymore to many parents. All I can find so far that can be considered feminist is that Belle is now a hobbyist inventor. What's wrong with that? Her father's an inventor, doesn't it make sense for him historically to pass his trade to his daughter as he lacks a son?

I think you're being clouded by your grudge against Emma Watson for whatever reason.
I'm Female.
19 Years Old, Chinese American, Devout Buddhist, Biochemistry Student

PRO: Nordic Model, Secular Government, LGBTQ+ Rights, Gender Equality & Feminism, Environmental Conservation, Renewable Energy, GMOs, Vastly increased funding for scientific research in academia, Buddhist Nuns everywhere, FOR THE HORDE!

ANTI: Donald Trump, Social conservatism, Christian and Islamic fundamentalism, Anti-Choicers, Homophobia, Transphobia, Biphobia, Anti-intellectualism, Young Earth Creationists, "Alternative Medicine", the Qing Dynasty, Chipotle.

User avatar
Arridian Islands
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 413
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

I have questions for western feminists

Postby Arridian Islands » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:23 pm

I'm not really sure WHERE this should be posted, but this seemed the best choice, so sorry if I'm wrong. But, anyways here's my questions. Why do you complain about there not being enough female videogame characters, when there are much bigger problems, like women not being allowed to drive, or leave the house in Saudi Arabia? Why do you complain about a "rape culture" in America when there are real rape cultures in many less developed countries?
If you want to contact me on my views or anything else, telegram me or add me on skype, my username is akyrathewolf.
I have 0 active alts now. RIP
My personal views:
Pro: nationalism, social democracy, environmentalism, freedom, gun rights, LGBT rights, language preservation/ language revival, Native American interests, atheism

Anti: Any extremism, Islam, feminism, SJWs, violent protesters, racial supremacy, laissez-faire, Democrats and Republicans (USA), BLM, interventionism

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:25 pm

It is possible to be concerned about more than one issue at once. "People elsewhere have it worse" is not an excuse for poor treatment at home.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Arridian Islands
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 413
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arridian Islands » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:26 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:It is possible to be concerned about more than one issue at once. "People elsewhere have it worse" is not an excuse for poor treatment at home.

How is not having good videogame characters an issue? Feminists pay NO attention to actual issues involving real women issues.
If you want to contact me on my views or anything else, telegram me or add me on skype, my username is akyrathewolf.
I have 0 active alts now. RIP
My personal views:
Pro: nationalism, social democracy, environmentalism, freedom, gun rights, LGBT rights, language preservation/ language revival, Native American interests, atheism

Anti: Any extremism, Islam, feminism, SJWs, violent protesters, racial supremacy, laissez-faire, Democrats and Republicans (USA), BLM, interventionism

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:26 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:I'm not really sure WHERE this should be posted, but this seemed the best choice, so sorry if I'm wrong. But, anyways here's my questions. Why do you complain about there not being enough female videogame characters, when there are much bigger problems, like women not being allowed to drive, or leave the house in Saudi Arabia? Why do you complain about a "rape culture" in America when there are real rape cultures in many less developed countries?


why do you concern yourself with your own elections instead of the japanese election? because it's your own election and you have more control over it, more stake over it and it affects you more. it's also significantly easier to affect change at home than abroad. and no, there is nobody that thinks "wow saudi arabia ia just the bees knees".
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42342
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:27 pm

Fallacy of relative privation. I can be worried about things that happen elsewhere as well as worried about things that happen here. That being said, fewer women in video games is a very minor concern for me. If it must relate to video games, I am more "worried" about the type of character rather then then number of characters.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:27 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:It is possible to be concerned about more than one issue at once. "People elsewhere have it worse" is not an excuse for poor treatment at home.

How is not having good videogame characters an issue? Feminists pay NO attention to actual issues involving real women issues.


are you sure you're not expecting us to answer for a straw feminist
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:27 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:It is possible to be concerned about more than one issue at once. "People elsewhere have it worse" is not an excuse for poor treatment at home.

How is not having good videogame characters an issue? Feminists pay NO attention to actual issues involving real women issues.

That's ok. You paid no attention to the existing feminist thread that this would fit neatly into without unnecessarily cluttering the forum.

If we can forgive you, you can forgive them.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Italios
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17520
Founded: Dec 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Italios » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:27 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:It is possible to be concerned about more than one issue at once. "People elsewhere have it worse" is not an excuse for poor treatment at home.

How is not having good videogame characters an issue? Feminists pay NO attention to actual issues involving real women issues.

I know this may come as a shock, but as you clearly disagree with the western feminist's general goals and beliefs, of course you're not going to agree with them on what counts as legitimate issue.
Issue Author #1461: No Shirt, No Shoes, No ID, No Service.

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:28 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:It is possible to be concerned about more than one issue at once. "People elsewhere have it worse" is not an excuse for poor treatment at home.

How is not having good videogame characters an issue? Feminists pay NO attention to actual issues involving real women issues.


Sounds like you're making a pretty big over-generalization to justify your random dislike of feminism.
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Arridian Islands
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 413
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arridian Islands » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:28 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
Arridian Islands wrote:I'm not really sure WHERE this should be posted, but this seemed the best choice, so sorry if I'm wrong. But, anyways here's my questions. Why do you complain about there not being enough female videogame characters, when there are much bigger problems, like women not being allowed to drive, or leave the house in Saudi Arabia? Why do you complain about a "rape culture" in America when there are real rape cultures in many less developed countries?


why do you concern yourself with your own elections instead of the japanese election? because it's your own election and you have more control over it, more stake over it and it affects you more. it's also significantly easier to affect change at home than abroad. and no, there is nobody that thinks "wow saudi arabia ia just the bees knees".

If women who got raped in America were ARRESTED then it would make more sense for American feminists to pay more attention to that. And, sure, you may disagree with Saudi Arabia's policies but people are afraid to insult their stupid rape culture cuz "omg islamophobia!!11"
If you want to contact me on my views or anything else, telegram me or add me on skype, my username is akyrathewolf.
I have 0 active alts now. RIP
My personal views:
Pro: nationalism, social democracy, environmentalism, freedom, gun rights, LGBT rights, language preservation/ language revival, Native American interests, atheism

Anti: Any extremism, Islam, feminism, SJWs, violent protesters, racial supremacy, laissez-faire, Democrats and Republicans (USA), BLM, interventionism

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:29 pm

I'm concerned about the big problems and the little problems, and I try to put a proportionate amount of effort and attention into them where possible.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42342
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:30 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:It is possible to be concerned about more than one issue at once. "People elsewhere have it worse" is not an excuse for poor treatment at home.

How is not having good videogame characters an issue? Feminists pay NO attention to actual issues involving real women issues.


Oh, there are groups that worry about say women in some states still having issues getting into STEM fields due to family not supporting them. There are groups who are worried about women not being drafted (some who want the draft extended whole others want it removed, and yes those who want to keep it as is).
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:30 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
why do you concern yourself with your own elections instead of the japanese election? because it's your own election and you have more control over it, more stake over it and it affects you more. it's also significantly easier to affect change at home than abroad. and no, there is nobody that thinks "wow saudi arabia ia just the bees knees".

If women who got raped in America were ARRESTED then it would make more sense for American feminists to pay more attention to that. And, sure, you may disagree with Saudi Arabia's policies but people are afraid to insult their stupid rape culture cuz "omg islamophobia!!11"

Seems like you've already made up your mind and just came here to whine and display your biases than to actually ask a question.
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:30 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
why do you concern yourself with your own elections instead of the japanese election? because it's your own election and you have more control over it, more stake over it and it affects you more. it's also significantly easier to affect change at home than abroad. and no, there is nobody that thinks "wow saudi arabia ia just the bees knees".

If women who got raped in America were ARRESTED then it would make more sense for American feminists to pay more attention to that. And, sure, you may disagree with Saudi Arabia's policies but people are afraid to insult their stupid rape culture cuz "omg islamophobia!!11"


no. there is no one afraid to call saudi arabia shit. even in circles where people are over-sensitive about islamophobia there is no spirited defence of respecting saudi arabia's rape culture. you are making things up.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Arridian Islands
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 413
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arridian Islands » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:31 pm

Alvecia wrote:I'm concerned about the big problems and the little problems, and I try to put a proportionate amount of effort and attention into them where possible.

Well, you're a minority to feminists then. Most feminists are concerned with incredibly small problems that have nothing to do with women being oppressed.
If you want to contact me on my views or anything else, telegram me or add me on skype, my username is akyrathewolf.
I have 0 active alts now. RIP
My personal views:
Pro: nationalism, social democracy, environmentalism, freedom, gun rights, LGBT rights, language preservation/ language revival, Native American interests, atheism

Anti: Any extremism, Islam, feminism, SJWs, violent protesters, racial supremacy, laissez-faire, Democrats and Republicans (USA), BLM, interventionism

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42342
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:31 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
why do you concern yourself with your own elections instead of the japanese election? because it's your own election and you have more control over it, more stake over it and it affects you more. it's also significantly easier to affect change at home than abroad. and no, there is nobody that thinks "wow saudi arabia ia just the bees knees".

If women who got raped in America were ARRESTED then it would make more sense for American feminists to pay more attention to that. And, sure, you may disagree with Saudi Arabia's policies but people are afraid to insult their stupid rape culture cuz "omg islamophobia!!11"


You know it is possible to work against Islamophobia and also disagree with the culture within Saudi Arabia.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20361
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:31 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Alvecia wrote:I'm concerned about the big problems and the little problems, and I try to put a proportionate amount of effort and attention into them where possible.

Well, you're a minority to feminists then. Most feminists are concerned with incredibly small problems that have nothing to do with women being oppressed.

I think you're wrong.

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:31 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Alvecia wrote:I'm concerned about the big problems and the little problems, and I try to put a proportionate amount of effort and attention into them where possible.

Well, you're a minority to feminists then. Most feminists are concerned with incredibly small problems that have nothing to do with women being oppressed.

[citation needed]
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Italios
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17520
Founded: Dec 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Italios » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:32 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
why do you concern yourself with your own elections instead of the japanese election? because it's your own election and you have more control over it, more stake over it and it affects you more. it's also significantly easier to affect change at home than abroad. and no, there is nobody that thinks "wow saudi arabia ia just the bees knees".

If women who got raped in America were ARRESTED then it would make more sense for American feminists to pay more attention to that. And, sure, you may disagree with Saudi Arabia's policies but people are afraid to insult their stupid rape culture cuz "omg islamophobia!!11"

It appears that one who devotes all their attention to whether or not the current video game character lineup is appropriate or not is you. Feminists, just like anyone else, have the ability to care about more than one issue at once.
Issue Author #1461: No Shirt, No Shoes, No ID, No Service.

User avatar
Arridian Islands
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 413
Founded: Jun 17, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arridian Islands » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:32 pm

Alvecia wrote:
Arridian Islands wrote:Well, you're a minority to feminists then. Most feminists are concerned with incredibly small problems that have nothing to do with women being oppressed.

I think you're wrong.

I mean American and western European feminists. Feminists in countries like Saudi Arabia, or India are actually doing good for the world.
If you want to contact me on my views or anything else, telegram me or add me on skype, my username is akyrathewolf.
I have 0 active alts now. RIP
My personal views:
Pro: nationalism, social democracy, environmentalism, freedom, gun rights, LGBT rights, language preservation/ language revival, Native American interests, atheism

Anti: Any extremism, Islam, feminism, SJWs, violent protesters, racial supremacy, laissez-faire, Democrats and Republicans (USA), BLM, interventionism

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42342
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:33 pm

Arridian Islands wrote:
Alvecia wrote:I think you're wrong.

I mean American and western European feminists. Feminists in countries like Saudi Arabia, or India are actually doing good for the world.

Citation still needed.Why did this need a separate thread?
Last edited by Neutraligon on Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
The Grande Republic 0f Arcadia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1990
Founded: Oct 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grande Republic 0f Arcadia » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:34 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
Arridian Islands wrote:If women who got raped in America were ARRESTED then it would make more sense for American feminists to pay more attention to that. And, sure, you may disagree with Saudi Arabia's policies but people are afraid to insult their stupid rape culture cuz "omg islamophobia!!11"


no. there is no one afraid to call saudi arabia shit. even in circles where people are over-sensitive about islamophobia there is no spirited defence of respecting saudi arabia's rape culture. you are making things up.


No, its not that it is that the western "Feminists" are too lazy and/or ill equipped to handle foreign matters that actually matter, so they focus on BS first world issues like "Gamergate"
Proud Member of theINTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION!
https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=422664

Been on NS since 2014
Right Leaning Centrist Kinda Libertarian Kinda Republican Take Your Pick

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hidrandia, Life empire, Picairn, Port Carverton, Shamhnan Insir, Shearoa, The Genovese Family, Three Galaxies, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads