NATION

PASSWORD

Boxing should be Banned

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Galnius
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17525
Founded: May 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Galnius » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:27 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Asyir wrote:No it is not.

The military's purpose is to protect the rights of the people and to protect the people. If you go around banning shit, and the military turned on that government, then it would not be an act of dishonor. They would be fulfilling their purpose.


no the military isn't supposed to have a say in policy, that's the prerogative of the legislature

It is supposed to protect the people, and the military is also full of independent, free minds you know...
I've read your Sig! I've read your soul

Before you complain, remember, Kangaroos can't hop backwards. Really makes your problems seem small don't it.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:28 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
What do you mean?


You said "It is simply a paid-to-fight paid-to-entertain unethical business" and I asked what if you don't train to fight professionally for money? I've trained quite a few different styles and I'm going to keep doing that but I have no intention of doing it for a job or for money. Why should I be banned from legally doing that?


training for self-defense or as part of a police/military training program is fine, but utilising boxing as spectacle isn't

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53342
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:29 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
You said "It is simply a paid-to-fight paid-to-entertain unethical business" and I asked what if you don't train to fight professionally for money? I've trained quite a few different styles and I'm going to keep doing that but I have no intention of doing it for a job or for money. Why should I be banned from legally doing that?


training for self-defense or as part of a police/military training program is fine, but utilising boxing as spectacle isn't


Cool, so you don't want to ban it then.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:38 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
training for self-defense or as part of a police/military training program is fine, but utilising boxing as spectacle isn't


Cool, so you don't want to ban it then.


I primarily meant boxing as in the boxing done for entertainment/commercial purposes

User avatar
Petrolheadia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11388
Founded: May 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:40 pm

Slightly offtopic: I'm not a hater of women, but reading your threads I start to think that they should stay in the kitchen.
Capitalism, single-payer healthcare, pro-choice, LGBT rights, progressive personal taxation, low corporate tax, pro-business law, welfare for those in need.
Nazism, edgism, dogmatic statements, most of Abrahamic-derived morality (esp. as law), welfare for those not in need.
We are not Albania and I am not Albanian, FFS!
Male, gearhead, classic rock fan, gamer, agnostic.
Not sure if left-libertarian, ex-libertarian or without a damn clue.
Where you can talk about cars!
"They're always saying I'm a Capitalist pig. I suppose I am, but, ah...it ah...it's good for my drumming, I think." - Keith Moon,
If a Porsche owner treats it like a bicycle, he's a gentleman. And if he prays to it, he's simply a moron. - Jan Nowicki.

User avatar
Noraika
Minister
 
Posts: 2589
Founded: Nov 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Noraika » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:53 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:it is a blood sport, people have died and been injured, and it involves punching each other

also, people have literally bled

I know! Its awesome right~?
The more bloody the better. I don't see how blood in a sport inevitably makes it worthy of a ban. Let the blood flow~ <3 :p

In all seriousness, I fail to see how a blood sport, or blood or death in a sport, is intrinsically immoral, and even then that is a subjective assumption (in my point as well). I would, however, for the sake of hearing an argument contrary to my own, like to hear the precise and complex reasonings behind your conclusion: that blood sports, and particularly those between human beings, are intrinsically immoral.

Looking forward to your response~ :-3
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
TRANSEQUALITY~
~ Economic Left -9.38 | Social Libertarian -2.77 ~
~ 93 Equality - 36 Liberty - 50 Stability ~

Democratic Socialism ● Egalitarianism ● Feminism ● LGBT+ rights ● Monarchism ● Social Justice ● Souverainism ● Statism


Pronouns: She/Her ♀️
Pagan and proud! ⛦
Gender and sex aren't the same thing!

User avatar
Protestant England and Germany
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1627
Founded: Apr 24, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Protestant England and Germany » Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:04 pm

How did this go from a question on is there a moral reason for banning boxing to a discussion of the Military?

Though, as a ROTC cadet, I am going to throw my 2 cents on the subject and say that the US Military does have the ability to overthrow the government though it is illegal, especially if the president orders it to occupy congress. And any General, or high ranking officer, who orders it would become a traitor and be subject to the lawful use of the death penalty.
After spending 19 years on this earth, I've learned one important thing. Life is a bitch, but its the way you roll with the punches and fight back that makes it wonderful.
I am a right leaning independent
Regulated Capitalism, Regulated Socialism, Democracy 2nd Amendment, Castle Doctrine, Increased Military Spending, Israel, Kurdistan, Allowing Illegal Immigrants to become citizens by either joining the military, earning a college degree, or joining the work force, Affordable Health Care
Communism, Fascism, Dictatorships, Racism (across the board), Sexism (across the board), Extremism, Iran, China, Russia, Palestine, ISIS, People who take advantage of the system

User avatar
Baldapehlva
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 454
Founded: Aug 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Baldapehlva » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:26 pm

This is like one of those cases where the defense has incredible stacks upon stacks of evidence able to reach Pluto and yet.....the prosecution keeps attacking them with nonsensical "crucial pieces of evidence." IM, get you conservative brain out of the clouds.
Pro: Liberalism and socialism, Catholicism, Pope Francis, basic freedums, and the Beatles
Anti: ISIL (those ISILs!), racism, Black Lives Matter, Protestantism (But I love Episcopalians!), and true atheists.

Ako ay Pilipino. We do use NS stats, unlike the rest of the forum.
The Persian Journal
Former governor of Socrates Province Dahar Jahellus arrested in Moscow, requests for extradition denied | The 2016 State of the Nation set for February 1, 2016 at the Rafael Theatre | Jihadist group Daesh fully eliminated inside Baldapehlva, says anti-terrorism police force

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:34 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Flame Trees wrote:
"Extend our protection"? If "protection" is not willingly accepted, it's called something else.


harm prevention = protection


Yes, that was what the US thought when it instituted prohibition. Tell me, how well did that work?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19610
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Two Jerseys » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:43 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Galnius wrote:We havent yet, and we never will, unless the U.S. becomes totilatarian, which would cause the army to turn on the government, and just eject the ban and ideas anyway. Nice idealism though


enforcing laws =/= totalitarianism

also, I doubt the military would act with such dishonour

Of course they wouldn't...
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
New confederate ramenia
Minister
 
Posts: 2987
Founded: Oct 07, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New confederate ramenia » Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:44 pm

The Two Jerseys wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
enforcing laws =/= totalitarianism

also, I doubt the military would act with such dishonour

Of course they wouldn't...

This isn't a military coup. It's a secession.
probando

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:02 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
harm prevention = protection


Yes, that was what the US thought when it instituted prohibition. Tell me, how well did that work?


Contrary to popular opinion, prohibition was largely successful (and only ended because of political, rather than enforcement issues)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html
http://alcap.com/files/66/Themes/Prohib ... ss%202.pdf
http://www.nysun.com/comments/29611

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53342
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:10 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Yes, that was what the US thought when it instituted prohibition. Tell me, how well did that work?


Contrary to popular opinion, prohibition was largely successful (and only ended because of political, rather than enforcement issues)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html
http://alcap.com/files/66/Themes/Prohib ... ss%202.pdf
http://www.nysun.com/comments/29611


Your first source openly says organized crime flourished under prohibition, that isn't very convincing.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19610
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Two Jerseys » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:13 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Contrary to popular opinion, prohibition was largely successful (and only ended because of political, rather than enforcement issues)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html
http://alcap.com/files/66/Themes/Prohib ... ss%202.pdf
http://www.nysun.com/comments/29611


Your first source openly says organized crime flourished under prohibition, that isn't very convincing.

His third source is a reprint of his second source.
His fourth source is literally a letter to the editor.

Sorry, IM, you get an F for this assignment.
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:14 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Contrary to popular opinion, prohibition was largely successful (and only ended because of political, rather than enforcement issues)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html
http://alcap.com/files/66/Themes/Prohib ... ss%202.pdf
http://www.nysun.com/comments/29611


Your first source openly says organized crime flourished under prohibition, that isn't very convincing.


Organized crime, not to mention that in their search for imbibing alcohol, people started producing their own booze and several met with very bad ends.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibiti ... d_supplies
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1052
Founded: Mar 31, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Schwere Panzer Abieltung 502 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:16 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Yes, that was what the US thought when it instituted prohibition. Tell me, how well did that work?


Contrary to popular opinion, prohibition was largely successful (and only ended because of political, rather than enforcement issues)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html
http://alcap.com/files/66/Themes/Prohib ... ss%202.pdf
http://www.nysun.com/comments/29611

The Volstead act was largely hated through the general population.

The bottom line: Trying to ban boxing is a terrible idea. Crowds love it, and the participants presumably enjoy it. Even if they don't like it and are only doing it for the money, well, hell, you are describing almost any job anywhere.

Will you try and stop things like SCA combat or historical swordsmanship? There is no practical reason for learning those arts, as they celebrate the dead skill of swordsmanship. But people do it in droves because it's fun.
3dank5u
call me Shannon ^-^

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19610
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Two Jerseys » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:19 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Yes, that was what the US thought when it instituted prohibition. Tell me, how well did that work?


Contrary to popular opinion, prohibition was largely successful (and only ended because of political, rather than enforcement issues)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html
http://alcap.com/files/66/Themes/Prohib ... ss%202.pdf
http://www.nysun.com/comments/29611

Is the War on Drugs largely successful as well?
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:21 pm

Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
BK117B2
Minister
 
Posts: 2090
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby BK117B2 » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:29 pm

The Two Jerseys wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Contrary to popular opinion, prohibition was largely successful (and only ended because of political, rather than enforcement issues)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470475/
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html
http://alcap.com/files/66/Themes/Prohib ... ss%202.pdf
http://www.nysun.com/comments/29611

Is the War on Drugs largely successful as well?


Yes. Cartels, gangs, and terrorist organizations are making a lot of money with it.

Less successful for the rest of us

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7076
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:40 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Galnius wrote:"Police will deal with that".

Like with Marijuana, prohibition, etc.? Yeah no.


the prohibition on alcohol was a success but was pulled back because of political reasons

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html

Alcohol prohibition was a total failure, you would have to be dense not to see that.
Fly me to the moon on an irradiated manhole cover.
- Free speech
- Weapons rights
- Democracy
- LGBTQ+ rights
- Racial equality
- Gender/sexual equality
- Voting rights
- Universal healthcare
- Workers rights
- Drug decriminalization
- Cannabis legalization
- Due process
- Rehabilitative justice
- Religious freedom
- Choice
- Environmental protections
- Secularism
ANTI
- Fascism/Nazism
- Conservatism
- Nationalism
- Authoritarianism/Totalitarianism
- Traditionalism
- Ethnic/racial supremacy
- Racism
- Sexism
- Transphobia
- Homophobia
- Religious extremism
- Laissez-faire capitalism
- Warmongering
- Accelerationism
- Isolationism
- Theocracy
- Anti-intellectualism
- Climate change denialism

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7076
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:42 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
You said "It is simply a paid-to-fight paid-to-entertain unethical business" and I asked what if you don't train to fight professionally for money? I've trained quite a few different styles and I'm going to keep doing that but I have no intention of doing it for a job or for money. Why should I be banned from legally doing that?


training for self-defense or as part of a police/military training program is fine, but utilising boxing as spectacle isn't

You seem to have contradicted yourself again. So it's totally cool for one to be okay, but not the other?
Fly me to the moon on an irradiated manhole cover.
- Free speech
- Weapons rights
- Democracy
- LGBTQ+ rights
- Racial equality
- Gender/sexual equality
- Voting rights
- Universal healthcare
- Workers rights
- Drug decriminalization
- Cannabis legalization
- Due process
- Rehabilitative justice
- Religious freedom
- Choice
- Environmental protections
- Secularism
ANTI
- Fascism/Nazism
- Conservatism
- Nationalism
- Authoritarianism/Totalitarianism
- Traditionalism
- Ethnic/racial supremacy
- Racism
- Sexism
- Transphobia
- Homophobia
- Religious extremism
- Laissez-faire capitalism
- Warmongering
- Accelerationism
- Isolationism
- Theocracy
- Anti-intellectualism
- Climate change denialism

User avatar
In-outheart
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Oct 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby In-outheart » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:45 pm

It is their choice to die or not. But I prefer more safety protection like for helmet and stuff. Called modernization of boxing I guess

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Wed Oct 21, 2015 5:19 pm

I thought it already was banned.....no wait..it's actually just kept on premium/pay-per-view stations where it's only watched by hardcore fans until a "big fight" with a "big rivalry" comes along and normal people become interested in it for as long as the trash-talk train keeps rolling and then the sport falls into obscurity again.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Thu Oct 22, 2015 9:45 am

BK117B2 wrote:
The Two Jerseys wrote:Is the War on Drugs largely successful as well?

Yes. Cartels, gangs, and terrorist organizations are making a lot of money with it.

Less successful for the rest of us

Well, many people in police departments build their careers on valiantly fighting the narcotic menage, keeping prices high on the streets and business profitable for the drug lords. Your tax money at work, ladies and gentlemen!
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Thu Oct 22, 2015 10:48 am

The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
the prohibition on alcohol was a success but was pulled back because of political reasons

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/16/opini ... ccess.html

Alcohol prohibition was a total failure, you would have to be dense not to see that.


No, my sources say otherwise

its an oft-repeated but erroneous statement as part of the legalisation propaganda

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Arval Va, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bulgvicher, Ethel mermania, Fortitudion, Immoren, Kandorith, Katsyta, Port Caverton, The Jamesian Republic, The Sherpa Empire

Advertisement

Remove ads