Because it's a productive way of channeling life's difficulties into exercise, practice and skill.
Advertisement

by Jochistan » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:27 pm

by Infected Mushroom » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:28 pm

by Rubor Dolor » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:30 pm
it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important

by Lockdownn » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:30 pm

by Jochistan » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:31 pm
Lockdownn wrote:Why?
Take the Mckamey Manor for example, a horrible legal torture "haunted house". Yet people sign a waiver and go anyways knowing the risks.
Same with boxing, why stop people from doing what they want with their bodies? Seems like any other ban this cause I find it offensive law.

by Lockdownn » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:34 pm
Jochistan wrote:Lockdownn wrote:Why?
Take the Mckamey Manor for example, a horrible legal torture "haunted house". Yet people sign a waiver and go anyways knowing the risks.
Same with boxing, why stop people from doing what they want with their bodies? Seems like any other ban this cause I find it offensive law.
Your rights end when other peoples feels do, I guess.

by Salus Maior » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:36 pm

by Jochistan » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:37 pm

by Lockdownn » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:39 pm

by Lockdownn » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:40 pm
Jochistan wrote:Lockdownn wrote:And that's the case with this shitty open ended document called "the constitution". Of course, if you live in America.
But why ban it if it doesn't effect you? You don't like it, don't participate.
Well, that attitude could lead places where a society shouldn't go, I think.
But in the case of Sports that involve consenting people, yes. Don't like it, oh fucking well.

by Hastiaka » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:42 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Rubor Dolor wrote:
Autonomy in competent individuals who understand the risks and feel the benefits outweigh the negatives. As this is also true on a societal level we allow it.
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important

by Wisconsin9 » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:45 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Rubor Dolor wrote:
Autonomy in competent individuals who understand the risks and feel the benefits outweigh the negatives. As this is also true on a societal level we allow it.
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important

by Empire of Donner land » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:53 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Rubor Dolor wrote:
Autonomy in competent individuals who understand the risks and feel the benefits outweigh the negatives. As this is also true on a societal level we allow it.
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important
The Collected Entries Of Me In A Nutshell
"Donner: A chill guy who has no chill" - Esgonia
"Everything is wrong. Everything" - URA

by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:56 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Rubor Dolor wrote:
Autonomy in competent individuals who understand the risks and feel the benefits outweigh the negatives. As this is also true on a societal level we allow it.
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important

by Infected Mushroom » Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:59 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important
I could die from a countless number of things if I leave my house, should I be banned from doing that?

by The Greater Ohio Valley » Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:00 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Rubor Dolor wrote:
Autonomy in competent individuals who understand the risks and feel the benefits outweigh the negatives. As this is also true on a societal level we allow it.
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important

by The Free Territory of Rothbardia » Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:02 pm

by The Greater Ohio Valley » Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:02 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important
I could die from a countless number of things if I leave my house, should I be banned from doing that?

by Jochistan » Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:03 pm
The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important
At that rate nobody should be allowed to take part in any sport since they can all result in brain damage and death.

by Infected Mushroom » Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:04 pm

by Infected Mushroom » Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:04 pm
The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
people should not* be allowed to take such risks, it can result in serious brain damage and death
I fail to see why autonomy in this specific case should be so important
At that rate nobody should be allowed to take part in any sport since they can all result in brain damage and death.


by Jochistan » Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:08 pm

by Neutraligon » Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:10 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Fahran, Fartsniffage, GEORGIAN UNION, Herador, Hidrandia, Hirota, Lodhs beard, Mutualist Chaos, Primitive Communism, Querria, Riviere Renard, Valyxias, Zurkerx
Advertisement