Playboy To Drop Nude Pictorials In Magazine Overhaul

[Washington Resistance Army]

I'm starting to see a trend in your posting habits

Yes, I am 101 % anti-western

And 101% from the dark ages.

[Ifreann]

I'm starting to see a trend in your posting habits

Yes, I am 101 % anti-western

I don't think that pictures of naked ladies is an exclusively western phenomenon.

[Gauthier]

Yes, I am 101 % anti-western

And 101% from the dark ages.

And 101% likely browsing internet porn.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Yes, I am 101 % anti-western

I don't think that pictures of naked ladies is an exclusively western phenomenon.

Sumer did it first yo.

[Ashmoria]

Is playboy going to compete with maxim now?

how are they going to get past the "magazine that 89 year olds like" image?

[Alvecia]

I'm starting to see a trend in your posting habits

Yes, I am 101 % anti-western

I'm quite sure there are Eastern forms of pornography as well
*cough*Japan*cough*

[Luziyca]

Is playboy going to compete with maxim now?

how are they going to get past the "magazine that 89 year olds like" image?

Stop supporting the Republican Party, and stop being pro-life.

[Ifreann]

Yes, I am 101 % anti-western

I'm quite sure there are Eastern forms of pornography as well
*cough*Japan*cough*

India famously has no deceptions of sexual acts at all. Kama Sutra? No, that's from the vile, decadent west. Or it doesn't count as porn.

[Alvecia]

I'm quite sure there are Eastern forms of pornography as well
*cough*Japan*cough*

India famously has no deceptions of sexual acts at all. Kama Sutra? No, that's from the vile, decadent west. Or it doesn't count as porn.

I can't believe I forgot about the Kama Sutra.

[The Archregimancy]

I'm quite sure there are Eastern forms of pornography as well
*cough*Japan*cough*

India famously has no deceptions of sexual acts at all. Kama Sutra? No, that's from the vile, decadent west. Or it doesn't count as porn.

I can't post specific examples without breaking the site rules, but anyone who thinks Hinduism doesn't do pornography should google 'Khajuraho monuments' - the latter are a UNESCO World Heritage site consisting of a series of Hindu and Jain temples whose famous medieval erotic sculpture far surpasses the tame nudes in Playboy.

Playboy, for one, has never attempted to show anyone having sexual intercourse with a horse.

The Wikipedia entry is mostly safe; but I wouldn't open up the Google Images results for that search unless you're at home.

[Alvecia]

India famously has no deceptions of sexual acts at all. Kama Sutra? No, that's from the vile, decadent west. Or it doesn't count as porn.

I can't post specific examples without breaking the site rules, but anyone who thinks Hinduism doesn't do pornography should google 'Khajuraho monuments' - the latter are a UNESCO World Heritage site consisting of a series of Hindu and Jain temples whose famous medieval erotic sculpture far surpasses the tame nudes in Playboy.

Playboy, for one, has never attempted to show anyone having sexual intercourse with a horse.

The Wikipedia entry is mostly safe; but I wouldn't open up the Google Images results for that search unless you're at home.

Oh, I remember those.

Err....from...Nat Geo, of course. Where else?

[Ifreann]

India famously has no deceptions of sexual acts at all. Kama Sutra? No, that's from the vile, decadent west. Or it doesn't count as porn.

I can't post specific examples without breaking the site rules, but anyone who thinks Hinduism doesn't do pornography should google 'Khajuraho monuments' - the latter are a UNESCO World Heritage site consisting of a series of Hindu and Jain temples whose famous medieval erotic sculpture far surpasses the tame nudes in Playboy.

Playboy, for one, has never attempted to show anyone having sexual intercourse with a horse.

The Wikipedia entry is mostly safe; but I wouldn't open up the Google Images results for that search unless you're at home.

"I swear, I'm researching UNESCO World Heritage sites!"

[Naushantiya]

I can't post specific examples without breaking the site rules, but anyone who thinks Hinduism doesn't do pornography should google 'Khajuraho monuments' - the latter are a UNESCO World Heritage site consisting of a series of Hindu and Jain temples whose famous medieval erotic sculpture far surpasses the tame nudes in Playboy.

Playboy, for one, has never attempted to show anyone having sexual intercourse with a horse.

The Wikipedia entry is mostly safe; but I wouldn't open up the Google Images results for that search unless you're at home.

"I swear, I'm researching UNESCO World Heritage sites!"

I must warn you, the British moderator has digressed us all. This topic is not about Khajurao temples but about playboy

[Ostroeuropa]

Makes sense. Kind of sad in a way, but ultimately that's the price of progress.
I don't think they'll manage to stay relevant, frankly.

People are right. Nudity is passe to the extent that people are bored of it and now search ever crazier shit.

It's a wonderful world of porn out there folks. Just remember, behind the glazed over eyes of whoever you are talking at any time to is a non stop theater of disgusting and immoral acts of perversion the likes of which would make you rock hard and want to rub one out.

They might SEEM like decent folks, but really they're one egg whisk and three seashells away from stripping naked and demanding an orgy.

[Ifreann]

"I swear, I'm researching UNESCO World Heritage sites!"

I must warn you, the British moderator has digressed us all. This topic is not about Khajurao temples but about playboy

Yes, and Playboy is a porn magazine that's becoming less porn-y. And you say it should be banned. And you associate this with the west. And we are pointing out that depictions of naked people performing sex acts are not the sole purview of the west, as evidenced by such things as the Kama Sutra and the Khajurao monuments.

[Alvecia]

"I swear, I'm researching UNESCO World Heritage sites!"

I must warn you, the British moderator has digressed us all. This topic is not about Khajurao temples but about playboy

Careful Nau, your bias is showing.

[Naushantiya]

I must warn you, the British moderator has digressed us all. This topic is not about Khajurao temples but about playboy

Yes, and Playboy is a porn magazine that's becoming less porn-y. And you say it should be banned. And you associate this with the west. And we are pointing out that depictions of naked people performing sex acts are not the sole purview of the west, as evidenced by such things as the Kama Sutra and the Khajurao monuments.

The west is the sole reason for the objectification of women and the mouthpiece of this is the playboy magasin

[Alvecia]

Yes, and Playboy is a porn magazine that's becoming less porn-y. And you say it should be banned. And you associate this with the west. And we are pointing out that depictions of naked people performing sex acts are not the sole purview of the west, as evidenced by such things as the Kama Sutra and the Khajurao monuments.

The west is the sole reason for the objectification of women and the mouthpiece of this is the playboy magasin

The east is the sole reason for the objectification of women and the mouthpiece of this is the Kama Sutra

[Ostroeuropa]

Yes, and Playboy is a porn magazine that's becoming less porn-y. And you say it should be banned. And you associate this with the west. And we are pointing out that depictions of naked people performing sex acts are not the sole purview of the west, as evidenced by such things as the Kama Sutra and the Khajurao monuments.

The west is the sole reason for the objectification of women and the mouthpiece of this is the playboy magasin

I see the problem here.

This person is a feminist from a non-western country. So in addition to the usual outright denial of reality, they've also got some post-colonial rage going on.

How nice it must be for men in your country to be the good ones. Unlike those savage foreigners.

Maybe you should protect the women from them.

[Alvecia]

The west is the sole reason for the objectification of women and the mouthpiece of this is the playboy magasin

I see the problem here.

This person is a feminist from a non-western country. So in addition to the usual outright denial of reality, they've also got some post-colonial rage going on.

Be careful how you word that. To me it sound like you believe feminists outright deny reality.

[Eol Sha]

Yes, and Playboy is a porn magazine that's becoming less porn-y. And you say it should be banned. And you associate this with the west. And we are pointing out that depictions of naked people performing sex acts are not the sole purview of the west, as evidenced by such things as the Kama Sutra and the Khajurao monuments.

The west is the sole reason for the objectification of women and the mouthpiece of this is the playboy magasin

Hardly. Ignoring "The west is the sole reason for the objectification of women", you give too much power and influence to Playboy.

[Ostroeuropa]

I see the problem here.

This person is a feminist from a non-western country. So in addition to the usual outright denial of reality, they've also got some post-colonial rage going on.

Be careful how you word that. To me it sound like you believe feminists outright deny reality.

Yeh, they do. I've argued how so on numerous occasions. So do creationists. Plenty of people aren't in contact with whats really going on and instead interact with an ideological system that explains everything to them. They aren't interested in facts, only a narrative.

That's why this person is saying such silly things about the west that are patently untrue. Because it fits their anti-colonialist feminist narrative.

It's extremely common with feminists that they'll say something that is factually incorrect because their cultish religion told them it was true.
Like creationists.

They are in denial.

[Alvecia]

Be careful how you word that. To me it sound like you believe feminists outright deny reality.

Yeh, they do. I've argued how so on numerous occasions. So do creationists. Plenty of people aren't in contact with whats really going on and instead interact with an ideological system that explains everything to them. They aren't interested in facts, only a narrative.

That's why this person is saying such silly things about the west.

I concur on the topic of creationists.
I think we may be starting with differing definitions of the word feminist

[Ostroeuropa]

Yeh, they do. I've argued how so on numerous occasions. So do creationists. Plenty of people aren't in contact with whats really going on and instead interact with an ideological system that explains everything to them. They aren't interested in facts, only a narrative.

That's why this person is saying such silly things about the west.

I concur on the topic of creationists.
I think we may be starting with differing definitions of the word feminist

Well if you want to take it to the feminism thread and give your definition i'd be happy to outline my reasons for this position.

Here though, i'm just pointing out that this seems to be the cause of that poster saying the objectification of women originates entirely the western world. I think this is a result of their feminist anti-colonialist lens making them a zealot who will deny facts to assert a narrative.

[Ifreann]

Yes, and Playboy is a porn magazine that's becoming less porn-y. And you say it should be banned. And you associate this with the west. And we are pointing out that depictions of naked people performing sex acts are not the sole purview of the west, as evidenced by such things as the Kama Sutra and the Khajurao monuments.

The west is the sole reason for the objectification of women and the mouthpiece of this is the playboy magasin

Are we to take your word for this, or can you explain why depictions of naked people performing sex acts from other cultures do not contribute to the objectification of women?